Static electricity ignition

The worst hazard scenarios (excessive temperature and pressure rise accompanied by emission of toxic substances) must be worked out based upon calorimetric measurements (e.g. means to reduce hazards by using the inherent safety concept or Differential Scanning Calorimetry, DSC) and protection measures must be considered. If handling hazardous materials is considered too risky, procedures for generation of the hazardous reactants in situ in the reactor might be developed. Micro-reactor technology could also be an option. Completeness of the data on flammability, explosivity, (auto)ignition, static electricity, safe levels of exposure, environmental protection, transportation, etc. must be checked. Incompatibility of materials to be treated in a plant must be determined. 

While with-in the mobile x-ray system, the waste in the sampler, is contained within a replaceable (and disposable) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sleeve with a wall thickness of approximately 0.2-inches and a sealed bottom. It was anticipated that the PVC tube or sleeve would, with use, become highly contaminated with waste residues which drip of fall-off the sampler. The sleeve is coated with a conductive coating to prevent static electricity buildup . There are no sources of ignition in this sealed spare. The sampler (and waste) is coupling which includes a positive pressure gasket. This barrier is further isolated by a second barrier consisting of an epoxy coated aluminum sleeve also sealed-off from the main x-ray cabinet and PVC sleeve. There are also no potential sources of ignition in this isolated secondary space as well. 

Toluene is a notoriously poor electrical conductor even in grounded equipment it has caused several fires and explosions from static electricity. Near normal room temperature it has a concentration that is one of the easiest to ignite and, as previously discussed, that generates maximum explosion effects when ignited (Bodurtha, 1980, p. 39). Methyl alcohol has similar characteristics, but it is less prone to ignition by static electricity because it is a good conductor. Acetone is also a good conductor, but it has an equihbrium vapor pressure near normal room temperature, well above UFL. Thus, acetone is not flammable in these circumstances. 

Intrinsic Safety. Static electrical concepts such as minimum ignition energy do not directly apply when assessing the safety of electrical circuits such as radios, flashlights and instmmentation. Intrinsically safe electrical equipment is usually available which has been subjected to fault analysis and testing. The equipment must be certified for the flammable atmosphere in which it will be used (NFPA 497). Refer to texts on Intrinsic Safety such as [63]. 

In order for static electricity to be a source of ignition, four conditions must be fulfilled... 

It is recommended that flammability always be assessed first, since it is inherently safer to avoid flammable atmospheres than to avoid sources of ignition such as static electricity. If a flammable atmosphere cannot be avoided at all times, the system should be designed to minimize both the probability and consequences of ignition. In this chapter it is assumed that static electricity is the only source of ignition however, in practical situations all sources of ignition such as those described in [ 157] should be evaluated. 

Equipment Failures Safety system Ignition Sources Furnaces, Flares, Incinerators, Vehicles, Electrical switches. Static electricity, Hot surfaces. Cigarettes Human Failures Omission, Commission, Fault diagnosis. Decisions Domino Effects Other containment failures. Other material release External Conditions Meteorology, Visibility... 

On one occasion a tank truck was being splash-filled with gas oil, (lash point 60°C. The splashing produced a lot of mist, and it also produced a charge of static electricity on the gas oil. This discharged, igniting the mist. There was a fire with flames 10 m high but no explosion. The flames went out as soon as the mist had been burned. 

Note that grounding a tank truck will not prevent ignition of vapor by a discharge of static electricity. Grounding will prevent a discharge from the tank to earth, but it will not prevent a discharge from the liquid in the tank to the tank or to the filling arm. 

Static electricity (static for short) has been blamed for many fires and explosions, sometimes con ectly. Sometimes, however, investigators have failed to find any other source of ignition. So they assume that it must have been static even though they are unable to show precisely how a static charge could have been formed and discharged. 

Even if a static spark ignites a mixture of flammable vapor and air, it is not really correct to say that static electricity caused the fire or explosion. The real cause was the leak or whatever event led to the formation of a flammable mixture. Once flammable mixtures are formed, experience shows that sources of ignition are likely to turn up. The deliberate formation of flammable mixtures should never be allowed except when the risk... 

Ignition in 23% of the cases where this occurred, the source was unknown in about a third of the incidents in which the source was known, it was auto-ignition. Other common sources were flames, hot surfaces, sparks, lighming, static electricity and electrical equipment. In many cases conditions changed after a permit-to-work had been issued (see Section 1.3.2). 

These explosions in air are usually the result of the release of flammable gas and/or mists by leaks, rupture of equipment, or rupture of safety relierdng devices and release to the atmosphere, which become ignited by spark, static electricity, hot surfaces, and many other... 

---