Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrodynamic current step

The aforementioned experiments at rotating electrodes concerned merely steady-state conditions so-called transients123 at these electrodes, e.g., with potential or current steps, as well as with hydrodynamic modulation, i.e., variation of co with time, are, as a consequence of their non-steady-state conditions, less important in analysis and therefore will not be treated here. [Pg.207]

We will first briefly consider some of the treatments of potential step and current step techniques at hydrodynamic electrodes. One should bear in mind, however, that this division is somewhat artificial owing to the implicit dependence of one on the other. We then treat a.c. voltammetric techniques, LSV, and finally consider hydrodynamic modulation. [Pg.427]

The potential response of the RDE to current steps has been treated analytically [3, 237, 251] and accurately by Hale using numerical integration [252] this enables the elucidation of kinetic parameters [185, 253]. A current density—transition time relationship at the RDE has been established which accounts for observed differences from the Sand equation [eqn. (218)] and which has been applied to EC reactions [254]. Other hydrodynamic solid electrodes have not been considered in detail, although reversible reactions at channel electrodes have been discussed [255, 256]. [Pg.429]

Similarly to the response at hydrodynamic electrodes, linear and cyclic potential sweeps for simple electrode reactions will yield steady-state voltammograms with forward and reverse scans retracing one another, provided the scan rate is slow enough to maintain the steady state [28, 35, 36, 37 and 38]. The limiting current will be detemiined by the slowest step in the overall process, but if the kinetics are fast, then the current will be under diffusion control and hence obey the above equation for a disc. The slope of the wave in the absence of IR drop will, once again, depend on the degree of reversibility of the electrode process. [Pg.1940]

This technique was proposed by Bruckenstein and co-workers [280, 281] and is useful in that the current due to the modulation of the fluid flow is essentially free of any electrode surface-controlled contributions in most cases. Thus, it can be used as an analytical tool to increase sensitivity [282]. Step changes were originally considered but this was later extended to sinusoidal hydrodynamic modulation (SHM) in the limiting current region and then to the region of mixed convective-diffusion/kinetic control [283—287]. If the modulation frequency is o, then the modulation, which is small, can be described by... [Pg.432]

The fact of modulating the square root of Q was naturally supported by the results of the Levich theory in steady-state conditions [8]. With the increasing development of impedance techniques, aided by a sophisticated instrumentation [2], the authors of the present work promoted the use of impedance concept for this type of perturbation and introduced the so-called electrohydrodynamic (EHD) impedance [9, 10]. A parallel approach has been also investigated by use of velocity steps in both theoretical and experimental studies [5, 11, 12]. More recently, Schwartz et al. considered the case of hydrodynamic modulations of large amplitude for increasing the sensitivity of the current response and also for studying additional terms arisen with non linearities [13-15],... [Pg.209]

Electrochemical systems can be studied with methods based on impedance measurements. These methods involve the application of a small perturbation, whereas in the methods based on linear sweep or potential step the system is perturbed far from equilibrium. This small imposed perturbation can be of applied potential, of applied current or, with hydrodynamic electrodes, of convection rate. The fact that the perturbation is small brings advantages in terms of the solution of the relevant mathematical equations, since it is possible to use limiting forms of these equations, which are normally linear (e.g. the first term in the expansion of exponentials). [Pg.224]

A rather simple interpretation of the behaviour of vibrating electrodes can be obtained by considering the response to a square-wave motion, to which a sinusoid rather crudely approximates [33]. Here, it is considered that the concentration boundary layer is periodically renewed by the instantaneous rapid motion and that in the intervals between the square-wave steps the solution is at rest. This is a reasonable approximation for most practical purposes because the hydrodynamic boundary layer relaxation time is short, (Section 10.3.3). In this simple model, the waveform would instantaneously rise to a limit during the motion, decaying as a function of t m during the static phase. This decay rate will obviously be dependent on the size and geometry of the electrode wire, microwire, band or microband. If the delay time between steps were r then the mean current would vary as (l/r,)/o f 1/2df, i.e., as t, i/2 or as fm. [Pg.394]

The mechanism of particle incorporation is treated extensively in the next section, but a generalized mechanism is given here to better comprehend the effects of the process parameters. Particle incorporation in a metal matrix is a two step process, involving particle mass transfer from the bulk of the suspension to the electrode surface followed by a particle-electrode interaction leading to particle incorporation. It can easily be understood that electrolyte agitation, viscosity, particle bath concentration, particle density etc affect particle mass transfer. The particle-electrode interaction depends on the particle surface properties, which are determined by the particle type and bath composition, pH etc., and the metal surface composition, which depends on the electroplating process parameters, like pH, current density and bath constituents. The particle-electrode interaction is in competition with particle removal from the electrode surface by the suspension hydrodynamics. [Pg.484]

In e/ectrochemistry, however, there is an immediate connection to the physics of current flow and electric fields. Furthermore, it is difficult to pursue interfacial electrochemistry without knowing some principles of theoretical structural metallurgy and electronics, as well as hydrodynamic theory. Conversely (see Section 1.5.2), the range of fields in which the important steps are controlled by the electrical properties of interfaces and the flow of charge across them is great and exceeds that of other areas in which physical chemistry is relevant In fact, so great is the range of topics in which... [Pg.16]

In the quasi-steady-state approximation, which is also known as the step method [9], it is assumed that the rate of variation in the WP shape, that is, the anodic dissolution rate, is small compared with the rates of transfer processes in the gap therefore, for calculating the distribution of the current density, the WP surface can be considered as being immobile. This approximation can be used at not very high current densities. At very high current densities, ignoring the WP surface motion during anodic dissolution and the hydrodynamic flow induced by this motion causes a considerable error in the calculated distribution of current density [33]. [Pg.824]

Another system of defined hydrodynamics is the rotating disk electrode [17], and here the limiting-current depends upon the rate of rotation of the disk as shown in Figure 8. Since ultrasound also produces a step-shaped trace to a limiting current it is possible by comparing silent and sonicated traces at a disk electrode to calculate a theoretical rotation speed at which the disk would have to rotate to achieve the same transport limit as is found under ultrasound. [Pg.221]

As discussed above, the rate-limiting step in the oral absorption of Class II drug substances is likely to be the in vivo dissolution [23-25]. For Class II dissolution rate limited drugs, hence, if in vivo dissolution can be estimated in vitro, an in vitro-in vivo correlation may be established. As discussed in Section 3.5, such media have been developed, and an adequate IVIVC was shown for number of Class II drugs. However, due to the numerous in vivo parameters involved, it appears that more research is needed to develop uniform dissolution media reflecting in vivo dissolution conditions, to establish an adequate IVIVC, and to asses the risk of bioinequivalence [86, 88], In addition, the relationship between the hydrodynamics in the currently available dissolution tests and the actual in vivo situation is not adequately characterized and might interfere to obtain the correlation. [Pg.44]

While the above method of electrokinetic injection requires only a single step, it is possible to couple electrokinetic injections with a brief hydrodynamic injection of water. The column is initially full of BGE, followed by a hydrodynamic injection of water. Analyte is then electrokinetically injected until the measured current through the column is approximately 70-90% of the column when filled... [Pg.423]


See other pages where Hydrodynamic current step is mentioned: [Pg.1013]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.106]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.428 ]




SEARCH



Current step

© 2024 chempedia.info