Hydrodynamic behavior interface

When considering flow of a liquid in contact with a solid surface, a basic understanding of the hydrodynamic behavior at the interface is required. This begins with the Navier-Stokes equation for constant-viscosity, incompressible fluid flow, such that Sp/Sf = 0,... 

Polymers can be confined one-dimensionally by an impenetrable surface besides the more familiar confinements of higher dimensions. Introduction of a planar surface to a bulk polymer breaks the translational symmetry and produces a pol-ymer/wall interface. Interfacial chain behavior of polymer solutions has been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically [1-6]. In contrast, polymer melt/solid interfaces are one of the least understood subjects in polymer science. Many recent interfacial studies have begun to investigate effects of surface confinement on chain mobility and glass transition [7], Melt adsorption on and desorption off a solid surface pertain to dispersion and preparation of filled polymers containing a great deal of particle/matrix interfaces [8], The state of chain adsorption also determine the hydrodynamic boundary condition (HBC) at the interface between an extruded melt and wall of an extrusion die, where the HBC can directly influence the flow behavior in polymer processing. 

Hydrodynamic theory defines the behavior of shock waves at interfaces between elements of exqilosive trains in terms of curves that relate the shock velocity to the particle velocity, called Hugoniot curves. Assuming that mass and momentum are conserved across the shock front, one can write... 

Moving up into the reactor level, effects of convection, dispersion and generation are described in the conservation equations for mass and energy. The momentum balance describes the behavior of pressure. The interface between the reactor and the catalyst level is described by the external mass transfer conditions, most often represented in a Fickian format, i.e., a linear dependence of the rate of mass transfer on the concentration gradient. In cases where an explicit description of mixing and hydrodynamic patterns is required, the simultaneous integration of the Navier-Stokes equations is also conducted at this level. I f the reaction proceeds thermally, the conversion of mass and the temperature effect as a result of it are described here as well. 

The propenies of the solid-liquid or liquid-liquid interfaces are also important. often so important that their influence overshadows any other factor. The contribution of hydrodynamic driven phenomena such as slip Row, secondary flow, edge and end effects, viscous heating, and inertia may also play an important role (see Sec. IV). Good experimental and calculation procedures should ensure either that these factors are absent or that the data are corrected to eliminate their contribution. These will be discussed in Sec. IV. In the following sections, the main physicochemical factors that influence rheological behavior and viscosity are discussed. For the sake of clarity, a distinction will be made between the factors that are related to physical propeities such as composition and particle size, and physicochemical aspects, especially inteifacial properties. 

For gas-liquid-liquid reactions equipment similar to that used for liquid-liquid reactions are employed. The hydrodynamics in these reactors is extremely complex because of the three phases and their convoluted interactions. An example is the grazing behavior of small solid particles enhancing mass transfer at gas-liquid interfaces. The scale-up from laboratory to the production site thus poses numerous problems with respect to the reactant s mixing, temperature control (heat removal), catalyst selectivity, and its deactivation [1]. The performance of such processes can be predicted analytically only to a limited extent for reactors with well-defined flow patterns. 

Coarse grain (CG) models must carry enough information about the atomistic behavior while at the same time be efficient to scale in both time (>1 ms) and length (> 100 s nm). For example, accurate models to represent solute-solvent interactions should account for solvent momentum so that its behavior can be consistent with hydrodynamics, have the correct density at the desired temperature, and be able to maintain a liquid/vapor interface over such a temperature [114],... 

Knowing the scaling laws [equations (5.3) and (5.4)] enables us to handle most viscous interface hydrodynamics problems dimensionally. Even though that approach may overlook the details of flows, the scaling laws provide us with a quick picture of the behavior of such flows (in terms of the pertinent parameters and how important quantities vary as functions of these parameters). In this sense, these laws provide a valuable path for problem solving. Whenever questions arise that involve cumbersome calculations, we will not hesitate to resort to this approach, all the while encouraging the reader to consult original papers for the details of the calculations. 

Typical polyelectrolyte behavior could be found for this type of micelles. Tuzar etal. [179] have shown for PS-PMAA the steep increase of the hydrodynamic radius nd of the electrophoretic mobility at a pH around 7, corresponding to the increases in dissociation of the carboxy groups when the pH was changed from 5 to 10 in various buffer solutions. In their experiments they could also demonstrate that the degree of dissociation decreases from the shell outer layer to the core-shell interface. 

---