Hydrocarbon predicted values, effect

Irons-phenyl, alkyl diazenes (2), peresters (3) and hydrocarbons (4). These equations are intended to be used for their predictive value for applications especially in the area of free radical polymerization chemistry. They are not intended for imparting deep understanding of the mechanisms of radical forming reactions or the properties of the free radical "products". Some interesting hypotheses can be made about the contributions of transition state versus reactant state effects for the structure activity relationships of the reactions of this study, as long as the mechanisms are assumed to be constant throughout each family of free radical initiator. 

With appropriate values of the various parameters, this model yielded predictions in good agreement with experiment on such phenomena as the amounts of various pure hydrocarbons solubilized in micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS as well as the amounts of benzene and -hexane solubilized in the same micelles from various mixtures of the two hydrocarbons. It was also able to predict transformation of rodlike micelles to spherical microemulsion droplets as a result of hydrocarbon solubilization, an effect that has been observed experimentally. In the absence of hydrocarbon, films of these surfactants can attain their preferred curvatures only by forming cylindrical micelles, as micelle radius is limited to the extended length of a surfactant molecule. However, when considerable hydrocarbon is present, this constraint no longer applies, and spherical microemulsion droplets can grow until the preferred curvature is reached. 

This table of standard bond energies can then be used to predict the heats of hydrogenation of any unsaturated hydrocarbon for wdiich steric effects are small. Some of these are shown In Table 9, from which it is seen that the predicted values are quite close to the experimental ones, even in cases where there is usually thought to be considerable conjugation or hyperconjuga-stabilization. Most of the results, in fact, show a small destabilization energy, probably due to the simplifying assumption of... 

Almost similar results were obtained experimentally by Votruba et al. [19], who studied evaporation of water and hydrocarbons from porous monoliths. These results predict Nu and Sh values clearly lower than does Eq. (13), and moreover suggest that Nu or Sh values would fall under their theoretically predicted lower limit at a low Reynolds number [16,20]. It is not unlikely that the discrepancy is due to a maldistribution of flow over the different monolith channels, as a result of the low pressure drop, similar to the effect signalized for fixed beds at low Reynolds numbers [7]. Experimental work [4], which was carried out with an inert fixed bed in front of the monolith reactor to assure an even distribution, gave data that come quite near to the results of Hawthorne, Eq. (13) [2]. 

---