High internal standards procedure

There is no specialised national or international standard procedure to test all the mechanical and physical tests which may be applied to highly dense and compacted materials. A selection of national or international standards allied to bulk powder properties is, however, shown in Table 1.7. 

High performance liquid chromatography is used for the separation and quantitative analysis of a wide variety of mixtures, especially those in which the components are insufficiently volatile and/or thermally stable to be separated by gas chromatography. This is illustrated by the following method which may be used for the quantitative determination of aspirin and caffeine in the common analgesic tablets, using phenacetin as internal standard where APC tablets are available the phenacetin can also be determined by this procedure. 

It is clear that neither NMEA nor NDPA is appropriate for an internal standard in NDMA determination if criteria are interpreted strictly, but both compounds have been used for this purpose. Addition of a nitrosamine, not normally present in the sample, is helpful in detecting any gross errors in the procedure, but the addition should not be considered to be internal standardization. Utilization of NMEA or NDPA to indicate recovery of NDMA can lead to significant errors. In most reports of the application of these "internal standards", recovery of all nitrosamines was close to 100%. Under these conditions, any added compound would appear to be a good internal standard, but none is necessary. NDMA is a particularly difficult compound for use of internal standardization because of its anomalous distribution behavior. I mass j ectrometry is employed for quantitative determination, H- or N-labeled NDMA could be added as internal standard. Because the labeled material would coelute from GC columns with the unlabeled NDMA, this approach is unworkable when GC-TEA is employed or when high resolution MS selected ion monitoring is used with the equipment described above. 

Matrix effects were evaluated by Gago-Ferrero et al. [23]. Both signal suppression and signal enhancement were observed. The extent of these effects was found to be fairly dependent on the UV filter. Thus, quantification should be performed by standard addition or internal standard calibration. Since standard addition is a high time-consuming procedure, internal standard calibration with appropriate isotopi-cally labeled compounds is the best option. 

Because of the high volatility of cyclopentene, the above procedure was not attempted, and after the reaction the butadiene and cyclopentene were distilled into a 2-liter bulb to which was added a measured amount of fluorotrichloromethane as an internal standard for GLPC analysis. The amount of unreacted butadiene was obtained by comparison of the area ratio of butadiene and halomethane in the analysis with the ratio in a... 

Analytical method validation forms the first level of QA in the laboratory. Analytical quality assurance (AQA) is the complete set of measures a laboratory must undertake to ensure that it is able to achieve high-quality data continuously. Besides the use of validation and/or standardized methods, these measures are effective IQC procedures (use of reference materials, control charts, etc.), with participation in proficiency testing schemes and accreditation to an international standard, normally ISO/IEC 17025 [4]. Method validation and the different aspects of QA form the subject of Section 8.2.3. 

In the photographic procedure, the lack of a suitable internal standard for exposure correction, the attempt to record and determine all elements on one generalized exposure, and the very high concentration of the trace elements in the ash (for some samples as much as 33 times the amount reported in the coal) caused a poor relative standard deviation. However, of the 13 elements determined, only Co, Ni, Cr, and V were less precise than 20%, a level which we feel is suitable for a photographic method. 

Only a few works report a simple combination of conventional sample cleanup procedures with UV detection. Assay of CLO (OXA was internal standard) based on a protein precipitation using MeCN in acidic solution (pH 3.6) and LLE with chloroform was reported for milk samples. The organic layer was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was reconstituted in the mobile phase and injected into the chromatographic system with UV detection. Relatively clean chromatograms and high recoveries (75-84%) were obtained using this assay (55). 

Low Molecular Weight Acids. The method devised for analyzing free fatty acids will resolve Ci to CB acids as shown in Figure 1, except for formic and propionic acids which are poorly resolved under the conditions used. Propionic acid, however, has been shown to be absent in all mixtures of oxidation products, and thus it presents no problem in this study. Acetophenone, shown in the chromatogram, was a convenient and reliable internal standard for this technique. Detection by thermal conductivity was selected because the flame ionization detector is insensitive to formic acid and, as noted, the high volatility of methyl formate and acetate precludes their quantitative determination by reasonably simple esterification procedures. 

Normally, odd-numbered fatty acids are used as internal standards. While the use of internal standards ensures the correctness of the extraction procedure, it does not guarantee the completeness of extraction for different fatty acids. Due to this reason, a comparison between the methods is essential to truly determine the efficacy of extraction. Chavarri et al. (1997) compared two sample preparation procedures. The first method was the direct method developed by de Jong and Badings (1990), described above. The second method involved saponification with TMAH as described by Martin-Hemandez et al. (1988) and the formation of methyl esters in the injector prior to analysis. The authors found that separation of the FFAs from the triglycerides prior to derivatization improved the analysis. Another comparative study by Ardo and Polychroniadou (1999) reported that the saponification method described above (Martin-Hernandez et al., 1988) was found suitable for both low and high FFA levels in cheese. 

---