1-hexene selectivities

Pentene and, more importantly, 1-hexene selectivities also increase due to the internal (1-4) and (1-5) H-transfer reactions. 1-Propyl radical also increases for the same reason. 

Pt-CEO, at the expense of aromatization while the selectivities for producing MCP and isomers were similar to Pt-B. The residual activity of both supported Pt was much higher than that of Pt-B. The hexene selectivity on EPT increased less dramatically than on Pt-B. No hexene was produced on Pt-CEO. The S/So values for benzene were almost the same for all three catalysts. Isomer selectivity decreased to a smaller extent and MCP selectivity even increased after deactivation. Details of temperature and hydrogen pressure effects will be reported elsewhere. 

Ru(1PP)2(00)2, at 2000 ppm mthenium and 1-hexene as substrate, gives only an 86% conversion and a 2.4 1 linear-to-branched aldehyde isomer ratio. At higher temperatures reduced conversions occur. High hydrogen partial pressures increase the reaction rate, but at the expense of increased hydrogenation to hexane. Excess triphenylphosphine improves the selectivity to linear aldehyde, but at the expense of a drastic decrease in rate. 

The catalytic activitira of synfliesized catalysts are given in Table 1. The TS-1 catalyst exhibited the highest epoxide yield and the best catalytic performance for the epoxidation of 1-hexene. The convasion of cyclohexene, however, is the lowest over TS-1. In case of TS-1/MCM-41-A and TS-1/MCM-41-B, the selectivity to epoxide is much hi er than that of Ti-MCM-41. Moreover, the conversion of 1-hexene as well as cyclohexene is found larger on the TS-l/MCM-41-Aand TS-1/MCM-41-B than on other catalysts. While the epoxide yield from 1-hexene is nearly equivalent to that of TS-1, the yield from cyclohexene is much larger than those of the otiier two catalysts. Th e results of olefins epoxidation demonstrate that the TS-l/MCM-41-Aand TS-1/MCM-41-B possess the surface properties of TS-1 and mesoporosity of a typical mesoporous material, which were evidently brou in by the DGC process. 

Titanium containing hexagonal mesoporous materials were synthesized by the modified hydrothermal synthesis method. The synthesized Ti-MCM-41 has hi y ordered hexa rud structure. Ti-MCM-41 was transformed into TS-l/MCM-41 by using the dry gel conversion process. For the synthesis of Ti-MCM-41 with TS-1(TS-1/MCM-41) structure TPAOH was used as the template. The synthesized TS-l/MCM-41 has hexagonal mesopores when the DGC process was carried out for less than 3 6 h. The catalytic activity of synthesized TS-l/MCM-41 catalysts was measured by the epoxidation of 1-hexene and cyclohexene. For the comparison of the catalytic activity, TS-1 and Ti-MCM-41 samples were also applied to the epoxidation reaction under the same reaction conditions. Both the conversion of olefins and selectivity to epoxide over TS-l/MCM-41 are found hi er flian those of other catalysts. 

It also explains the /Z selectivity of products at low conversions (kinetic ratio. Scheme 19). In the case of propene, a terminal olefin, E 2-butene is usually favoured (E/Z - 2.5 Scheme 19), while Z 3-heptene is transformed into 3-hexene and 4-octene with EjZ ratios of 0.75 and 0.6, respectively, which shows that in this case Z-olefins are favoured (Scheme 20). At full conversion, the thermodynamic equilibriums are reached to give the -olefins as the major isomers in both cases. For terminal olefins, the E olefin is the kinetic product because the favoured pathway involved intermediates in which the [ 1,2]-interactions are minimized, that is when both substituents (methyls) are least interacting. In the metathesis of Z-olefins, the metallacyclobutanes are trisubstituted, and Z-olefins are the kinetic products because they invoke reaction intermediates in which [1,2] and especially [1,3] interactions are minimized. 

From these data, some key information can be drawn in both cases, the couple methane/pentane as well as the couple ethane/butane have similar selectivities. This implies that each couple of products (ethane/butane and methane/pentane) is probably formed via a common intermediate, which is probably related to the hexyl surface intermediate D, which is formed as follows cyclohexane reacts first with the surface via C - H activation to produce a cyclohexyl intermediate A, which then undergoes a second C - H bond activation at the /-position to give the key 1,3-dimetallacyclopentane intermediate B. Concerted electron transfer (a 2+2 retrocychzation) leads to a non-cychc -alkenylidene metal surface complex, C, which under H2 can evolve towards a surface hexyl intermediate D. Then, the surface hexyl species D can lead to all the observed products via the following elementary steps (1) hydrogenolysis into hexane (2) /1-hydride elimination to form 1-hexene, followed by re-insertion to form various hexyl complexes (E and F) or (3) a second carbon-carbon bond cleavage, through a y-C - H bond activation to the metallacyclic intermediate G or H (Scheme 40). Under H2, intermediate G can lead either to pentane/methane or ethane/butane mixtures, while intermediate H would form ethane/butane or propane. 

Two illustrations that show the power of this reaction for the preparation of strained cycloalkenes are the contractions of 102 to the propellane 103 , an application that has been reviewed , and of 104 to the bicyclo[2.1.1]hexene 105 . The utility of the Ramberg-Backlund rearrangement in the preparation of various natural products such as steroids , terpenoids and pheromones has been demonstrated. In addition to the synthetic applications mentioned in the previous subsection, several selected examples taken from the recent literature are given in equations 66-69. These examples further demonstrate the potential of this method for alkene synthesis in general. 

The catalyst reuse is carried out without treating Pd/ ACF between the runs. Negligible leaching (<10% within the experimental error) was observed after catalyst reuse. Figure 8 shows the initial reaction rate and the selectivity for several runs. After activity drops in the first run, it stabilizes at 0.085 0.008 kmolHj/kgp /s, while selectivity to 1-hexene is 94+1%. Kinetic curves are identical from the second to the sixth runs. 

The used Pd/ACF catalyst shows a higher selectivity than the fresh Lindlar catalyst, for example, 94 1% versus 89 + 2%, respectively, at 90% conversion. The higher yield of 1-hexene is 87 + 2% with the used catalyst versus 82 + 3% of the Lindlar in a 1.3-fold shorter reaction time. Higher catalyst activity and selectivity is attributed to Pd size and monodispersity. Alkynes hydrogenation is structure-sensitive. The highest catalytic activity and alkene selectivity are observed with Pd dispersions <20% [26]. This indicates the importance of the Pd size control during the catalyst preparation. This can be achieved via the modified ME technique. 

Typical concentration-time profiles during the 1-hexyne hydrogenation over 0.4wt.% Pd/ACF catalyst are presented in Figure 7 showing the experimental and simulated curves (Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism). Pd/ ACF materials with the same particle size but different Pd loading (0.4, 0.6, 1.2wt.%) show identical initial activity of 0.140 0.004 kmolHj/kgp(j/s. This indicates the absence of diffusion limitations. Selectivity to 1-hexene is 97.1 +0.4% up to 80% conversion, and 95.9 + 0.4% at 90% conversion. 

Hydrogenations involving consecutive reactions are common in the organic process industry and even in the hydrogenation of fats. In the fine chemicals industry we have examples of acetylenic (triple) bonds to be selectively converted to olefinic (double) bonds. Lange et al. (1998) have shown, for the comversion of the model substance 2-hexyne into cis-2-hexene, how catalytically active microporous thin-film membranes can accomplish 100% selectivity. This unusual selectivity is attributed to avoidance of backmixing. 

A series of anchored Wilkinson s catalysts were prepared by reacting the homogeneous Wilkinson catalyst with several alumina/heteropoly acid support materials. These catalysts were used to promote the hydrogenation of 1-hexene. The results were compared with those obtained using the homogeneous Wilkinson and a l%Rh/Al203 catalyst with respect to catalyst activity and stabihty as well as the reaction selectivity as measured by the amount of double bond isomerization observed. The effect which the nature of the heteropoly acid exerted on the reaction was also examined. 

An enantio-selective enzymatic hydrolysis of meso( )-2,5-diacetoxy-3-hexene gives (+)-( )-(25 ,5/ )-5-acetoxy-3-hexen-2-ol in 77% yield (92% ee).97 The monoacetate with its two allylic groups offers possibilities for stereo-controlled introduction of nucleophiles via Pd(0) catalysis. Synthesis of both enantiomers of the Carpenter bee pheromone based on this strategy is presented in Scheme 5.14.98... 

---