Heat accumulation calorimeters

Heat accumulation calorimeters allow a rise in temperature of the reaction system for exothermic reactions or a decrease in temperature for endothermic reactions. A reaction is followed by measurement of a temperature change as a function of time, although modern calorimeters allow the signal to be converted into power. An adiabatic solution calorimeter is typical of this class. 

Heat accumulation calorimeters are based on a precise evaluation of all the heat exchange terms between the reactor and its environment [15-17], For example, Cooney et al. [18] measured the temperature increase of an insulated reactor at regular intervals while the cooling system was switched off. The temperature increase is due to the heat production of growth. Constant contributions (e.g., heat losses, feed,. ..) were calibrated before inoculation. Improvements and modifications by accurate estimation and modeling of all heat fluxes were proposed by References [19,20]. 

As already indicated, Tian s equation supposes (1) that the temperature of the external boundary of the thermoelectric element 8e, and consequently of the heat sink, remains constant and (2) that the temperature Oi of the inner cell is uniform at all times. The first condition is reasonably well satisfied when the heat capacity of the heat sink is large and when the rate of the heat flux is small enough to avoid the accumulation of heat at the external boundary. The second condition, however, is physically impossible to satisfy since any heat evolution necessarily produces heat flows and temperature gradients. It is only in the case of slow thermal phenomena that the second condition underlying Tian s equation is approximately valid, i.e., that temperature gradients within the inner cell are low enough to be neglected. The evolution of many thermal phenomena is indeed slow with respect to the time constant of heat-flow calorimeters (Table II) and, in numerous cases, it has been shown that the Tian equation is valid (16). 

The only heat-flow rate discussed so far has been the heat flow through the reactor jacket (ijFlow in Fig- 8.1). For the general case of an isothermal reaction, the main heat-flowrates that have to be considered in a reaction calorimeter are shown in Fig. 8.2 and will be discussed next. In this discussion, ideal isothermal control of the reaction temperature, %, will be assumed [4]. Consequently, no heat accumulation terms of the reaction mixture and the reactor inserts are shown in Fig. 8.2. However, this underlying assumption does not hold for all applications and apparatuses. 

Calorimeters may also be classified with respect to the way they use the heat balance. In fact, every calorimeter is based on a heat balance (as reactors are). Here we may distinguish ideal accumulation calorimeters or adiabatic calorimeters, from ideal heat flow or isothermal calorimeters and isoperibolic11 calorimeters. 

This nomenclature is close to that proposed by Hemminger and Hohne in 1984. It makes use of the same three primary criteria the principle of measurement, the mode of operation and the construction principle. Each criterion leads to its own classification, as shown hereafter. The main difference from the 1984 classification is that, instead of only proposing two major methods of calorimetry (compensation of the thermal effects and measurement of the temperature differences, respectively) there are now three. This is obtained by splitting the second one into calorimeters that measure a heat-accumulation (including the adiabatic and the isoperibol calorimeters) and calorimeters that measure a heat-flow. 

Both Tc and Tq vary. This is a standard adiabatic calorimeter, either scanning or not. It is said to be "characterized only by heat accumulation and dynamic properties of integral objects". 

Calorimeters that are described by Eq. (3.7) are characterized only by heat accumulation. They are adiabatic-nonisothermal calorimeters, and usually called adiabatic calorimeters. Their functioning rule is based on the assumption that the temperatures of the calorimetric vessel and the shield change in the same manner during the measurement. Their dynamic properties are those of integral objects. 

In an adiabatic method ( 3.2.3), it is assumed that only heat accumulates in the calorimeter, which is treated as an integral object. A generated heat effect P(t) is then described by the first term on the right-hand side of Eq. (1.148). 

The first term on the left-hand side of Eqs (3.58) and (3.59) is equivalent to the amount of heat accumulated in the calorimeter proper, while the second term on the left-hand side of these equations is equivalent to the amount of heat exchanged between the calorimeter proper and the shield. 

The dynamic method presented above is based on the assumption that the heat effect generated in the calorimeter proper in part accumulates in the calorimetric vessel, and in part is transferred to the calorimetric shield. When excellent heat transfer occurs between the calorimeter proper and the shield (as in conduction microcalorimeters), it can be assumed that the quantity of heat accumulated is extremely small. This assumption is the basis of the flux method. The amount of heat transferred between the calorimeter proper and the shield is then directly proportional to the temperature difference. Thus, the course ofA(t) obtained from the measurement resembles that of P(t), and its value is determined on the basis of the second term on the left-hand side of Eq. (3.61) ... 

Heat flow calorimeters may be classified further with respect to the method bf heat transfer control. In passive systems, heat flow is induced by temperature changes of the scimple due to partial accumulation of the evolved heat. In active systems, a heat transfer controller causes heat transfer induced by the slightest deviation of the sample temperature from its set point. Three heat flow control principles are mainly used in active systems ... 

Usually, isothermal calorimeters are used to measure heat flow in batch and semi-batch reactions. They can also measure the total heat generated by the reaction. With careful design, the calorimeter can simulate process variables such as addition rate, agitation, distillation and reflux. They are particularly useful for measuring the accumulation of unreacted materials in semi-batch reactions. Reaction conditions can be selected to minimize such accumulations. 

If the deviation was an uncontrolled temperature increase, the temperature increase will continue and accelerate the reaction until the accumulated reactant has been converted. Therefore, it is important to know quantitatively the degree of reactant accumulation during the reaction course, as it predicts the degree of conversion, which may occur after interruption of the feed. This can be done by chemical analysis or by using a heat balance, for example from an experiment in a reaction calorimeter [4]. Since the accumulation is the result of a balance between the amount of reactant B introduced by the feed and the amount converted by the reaction, a simple difference between these two terms calculates the accumulation [5, 6]. 

If the reaction is complex, that is, if intermediates are formed during the reaction, an indirect method has to be used. Samples of the reaction mass are taken at defined stages of the reaction and analysed either chemically or thermally, for example, by DSC. This approach is also recommended when unstable intermediates are present in the reaction mixture the stability of the reaction mass may pass through a minimum. Another method is to stop the feed during an experimental mn in a reaction calorimeter and to measure the heat evolved after the interruption it is proportional to the accumulation (Figure 7.4). 

This is the most common mode of addition. For safety or selectivity critical reactions, it is important to guarantee the feed rate by a control system. Here instruments such as orifice, volumetric pumps, control valves, and more sophisticated systems based on weight (of the reactor and/or of the feed tank) are commonly used. The feed rate is an essential parameter in the design of a semi-batch reactor. It may affect the chemical selectivity, and certainly affects the temperature control, the safety, and of course the economy of the process. The effect of feed rate on heat release rate and accumulation is shown in the example of an irreversible second-order reaction in Figure 7.8. The measurements made in a reaction calorimeter show the effect of three different feed rates on the heat release rate and on the accumulation of non-converted reactant computed on the basis of the thermal conversion. For such a case, the feed rate may be adapted to both safety constraints the maximum heat release rate must be lower than the cooling capacity of the industrial reactor and the maximum accumulation should remain below the maximum allowed accumulation with respect to MTSR. Thus, reaction calorimetry is a powerful tool for optimizing the feed rate for scale-up purposes [3, 11]. 

You will be retrieving information on heats of formation from reference tables and data bases. The values in the tables have been reconciled from innumerable experiments. To determine the values of the standard heats (enthalpies) of forniation, the experimenter usually selects either a simple flow process without kinetic energy, potential energy, or work effects (a flow calorimeter), or a simple batch process (a bomb calorimeter), in which to conduct the reaction. Consider an experiment in a flow process under standard state conditions in which the experimental arrangement is such that the summation of sensible heat terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (4.33) is zero and no work is done. The steady-state (no accumulation term) version of Eq. (4.24a) for stoichiometric quantities of reactants and products reduces to... 

Closed, nonisothermal-nonadiabatic calorimeters have for a long time been the most widely used class of calorimeters. The heat effect that is generated in these calorimeters is in part accumulated the in calorimetric vessel and in part exchanged with its surrounding shield. These are dynamic properties of inertial objects. The parameter that is decisive as concerns their properties is the time constant (or time constants). 

In the flux method ( 3.2.7), the calorimeter is treated as a proportional object. In this method, it is assumed that the accumulation of heat in the calorimeter proper is negligibly small. 

---