Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hass action model

The actions are specified in terms of their effects on the participants, of which our component is one. For that purpose, each participant has a model. For simple objects, it may be... [Pg.280]

The behavior of anything from a simple object to a large, complex system can be specified with a type specification, which has actions specified in terms of a model. The rules for joining and subtyping can be described as operations that you perform on the specifi-... [Pg.347]

A mass action model (MAM) with monodisperse aggregation number N which depends on the micelle mole fraction x and the counterion binding parameter /3(x) has been developed for binary surfactants either ionic/ionic or nonionic/ionic. [Pg.54]

To this point, only models based on the pseudo—phase separation model have been discussed. Mixed micelle models utilizing the mass action model may be necessary for micelles with small aggregation numbers, as demonstrated by Kamrath and Franses ( ). However, even for large micelles, the fundamental basis for the pseudophase separation model needs to be examined. In micelles, how much solvent or how many counterions (bound or in the electrical double layer) should be included in the micellar pseudo-phase is unclear. The difficulty is normally surmounted by assuming that the pseudo—phase consists of only the surfactant components i.e., solvent or counterions are ignored. The validity of treating the micelle on a surfactant—oniy basis has not been verified. Funasaki and Hada (22) have questioned the thermodynamic consistency of such an approach. [Pg.328]

The thermodynamics of micelle formation has been studied extensively. There is for example a mass action model (Wennestrdm and Lindman, 1979) that assumes that micelles can be described by an aggregate Mm with a single aggregation number m, so that the only descriptive equation is mMi Mm. A more complex form assumes the multiple equilibrium model, allowing aggregates of different sizes to be in equilibrium with each other (Tanford, 1978 Wennestrdm and Lindman, 1979 Israelachvili, 1992). [Pg.187]

Summarizing the statements of these three most commonly used models, it appears that the so-called mass action and phase-separation models simulate a third condition which must be fulfilled with respect to the formation of micelles a size limiting process. The latter is independent of the cooperativity and has to be interpreted by a molecular model. The limitation of the aggregate size in the mass action model is determined by the aggregation number. This is, essentially, the reason that this model has been preferred in the description of micelle forming systems. The multiple equilibrium model as comprised by the Eqs. (10—13) contains no such size limiting features. An improvement in this respect requires a functional relationship between the equilibrium constants and the association number n, i.e.,... [Pg.99]

Model predictive control node. MPC has several components. It has a model (usually an identified linear) of the world. It has a KD where past values of the manipulated variables (MVs) and controlled variables (CVs) are stored. In this KD other information is stored as MVs and CVs limitations, weighting factors, etc. The model uses the inputs to predict the future. This state is used in Behavior Generation module. In this module an optimization is performed to select the best action plan. This plan (a set of movements for the MVs along with CVs values) is set and sent to the regulatory level. Some preprocessing is implemented as well. The MPC module implements also a feedback loop to correct model errors (due to model mismatch with the actual plant). [Pg.516]

Aggregation of surfactants in apolar solvents, e.g., aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons, occurs provided that small amounts of water are present [1,126,127], These aggregates are often called reverse micelles, although the solutions do not always appear to have a critical micelle concentration, and surfactant association is often governed by a multiple equilibrium, mass action, model vith a large spread of aggregate sizes [130,131], It has recently been suggested that the existence of a monomer f -mer equilibrium should be used as a criterion of micellization, and that this term should not be applied to self-associated systems which involve multiple equilibria [132],... [Pg.491]

The micelle has too small an aggregation number to be considered as a phase in the usual sense, and yet normally contains too many surfactant molecules to be considered as a chemical species. It is this dichotomy that makes an exact theory of solubilization by micelles difficult. The primary theoretical approaches to the problem are based on either a pseudophase model, mass action model, multiple equilibrium model, or the thermodynamics of small systems [191-196]. Technically, bulk thermodynamics should not apply to solute partitioning into small aggregates, since these solvents are interfacial phases with large surface-to-volume ratios. In contrast to a bulk phase, whose properties are invariant with position, the properties of small aggregates are expected to vary with distance from the interface [195]. The lattice model of solute partitioning concludes that virtually all types of solutes should favor the interface over the interior of a spherical micelle. While for cylindrical micelles, the internal distribution of solutes... [Pg.650]

On international level, in addition special aspects like the development of appropriate quantification algorithms in the fire PRA model in order to accurately calculate component importance measures are discussed by Kin and Han (2009). Moreover, in the U. S. a program has heen started to develop a methodology and associated guidance for performing quantitative human reliability analysis for post-fire mitigative human actions modeled in a Fire PSA. [Pg.2013]

While the mass action model of Equations 4.3 through 4.10 is an improvement over the phase separation model, it clearly has significant shortcomings. The aggregation number N, for instance, is a parameter that must be determined experimentally or otherwise specified, that is, it does not arise from the analysis... [Pg.174]

Thus in contrast to the mass action model [13], in the inductive model the ligand has the potential to increase the rate at which the active state of the enzyme is formed. In principle, this could be an important consideration when major, and presumably therefore energetically demanding, conformational rearrangements are involved in the shift from the ground state to the active form of the protein. [Pg.107]

Two approaches are generally used for modeling the properties of surfactant solutions, pseudophase and the mass action models. The pseudophase model is easier to use and has wider applicability in experimental work. For example, the pseudophase model is the basis for current interpretations of association colloid effects on the rates and equilibria of chemical reactions (Section 6). [Pg.180]

The results of the PRA show that the AP1000 has significantly less dependence on operator action to reduce plant risk to acceptable levels than current plants. This was shown through the sensitivity analyses and the operator action contributions from both the risk decrease and risk increase measures. Almost all operator actions credited in this PRA are performed in the control room there are very few local actions outside the control room. Further, the human actions modelled in the AP 1000 PRA are generally simple. Thus, the tasks for AP 1000 operators are easier and less likely to fail. If it were assumed that the operators never perform any actions credited in the PRA, the plant events CDF would still be lower than the result obtained for many eurrent pressurised water reactors including operator actions.This low dependence on operator aetion is therefore ALARP. [Pg.156]


See other pages where Hass action model is mentioned: [Pg.142]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.318]   


SEARCH



HA Model

Hass action model chemical potentials defined

Hass action model equation

Hass action model micellization

Hass action model system

© 2024 chempedia.info