Harmonic spring constant

Polarization of ions can be included in one of two ways. The natural approach is to use point ion polarizabilities, which has been successfully explored by Wilson and Madden (1996). An alternative, which has been used for many decades, is the so-called shell model (Dick and Overhauser 1958) as illustrated schematically in Figure 1. This is a simple mechanical model, in which an ion is represented by two particles-a core and a shell-where the core can be regarded as the representing the nucleus and inner electrons, while the shell represents the valence electrons. As such, all the mass is assigned to the core, while the total ion charge (qt = qc + qs) is split between both of the species. The core and shell interact by a harmonic spring constant, Kcs, but are Coulombically screened from each other. The polarizability is then given by ... 

In this section we describe the behavior of a ligand subjected to three types of external forces a constant force, forces exerted by a moving stiff harmonic spring, and forces exerted by a soft harmonic spring. We then present a method of reconstruction of the potential of mean force from SMD force measurements employing a stiff spring (Izrailev et al., 1997 Balsera ct al., 1997). 

We note that for the harmonic Hamiltonian in (5.25) the variance of the work approaches zero in the limit of an infinitely slow transformation, v — 0, r — oo, vt = const. However, as shown by Oberhofer et al. [13], this is not the case in general. As a consequence of adiabatic invariants of Hamiltonian dynamics, even infinitely slow transformations can result in a non-delta-like distribution of the work. Analytically solvable examples for that unexpected behavior are, for instance, harmonic Hamiltonians with time-dependent spring constants k = k t). 

For simplicity, let us consider a molecular system with a Hamiltonian J o(z) that is coupled to a harmonic spring with spring constant k and a time-dependent minimum r(t). The explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian of the complete system is then... 

The interaction of two harmonic oscillators with spring constants = k, and masses = m, separated by a distance = r is to be considered. Each atomic (molecular) oscillator has a frequency, v = ( /2n)J(k/m). Their orientations are assumed to be collinear (Figure 3.11). 

The diode model consists of two segments of nonlinear lattices coupled together by a harmonic spring with constant strength kint (see Fig. 6). Each segment is described by the (dimensionless) Hamiltonian ... 

The essential properties of incommensurate modulated structures can be studied within a simple one-dimensional model, the well-known Frenkel-Kontorova model . The competing interactions between the substrate potential and the lateral adatom interactions are modeled by a chain of adatoms, coupled with harmonic springs of force constant K, placed in a cosine substrate potential of amplitude V and periodicity b (see Fig. 27). The microscopic energy of this model is ... 

Electrons in metals at the top of the energy distribution (near the Fermi level) can be excited into other energy and momentum states by photons with very small energies thus, they are essentially free electrons. The optical response of a collection of free electrons can be obtained from the Lorentz harmonic oscillator model by simply clipping the springs, that is, by setting the spring constant K in (9.3) equal to zero. Therefore, it follows from (9.7) with co0 = 0 that the dielectric function for free electrons is... 

A famous and only partly solved problem of this type is the linear chain of harmonically bound particles, in which the masses and spring constants are random.5 0 A related problem is the determination of the distribution of eigenvalues of a random matrix. )... 

The nonlinear polarizabilities in the classical spring problem arise from anharmonic contributions to the spring constant. Resolution of eq. 3 into harmonics of frequency nu using trigonometric identities provides an understanding of how specific orders of anharmonicity in V(x) lead to anharmonic polarizations at frequencies different from that of the applied field S(t). In the classical problem, the coefficients an are determined by the anharmonicity constants in V(x) [10]. 

Quantitative evaluation of a force-distance curve in the non-contact range represents a serious experimental problem, since most of the SFM systems give deflection of the cantilever versus the displacement of the sample, while the experimentalists wants to obtain the surface stress (force per unit contact area) versus tip-sample separation. A few prerequisites have to be met in order to convert deflection into stress and displacement into tip-sample separation. First, the point of primary tip-sample contact has to be determined to derive the separation from the measured deflection of the cantilever tip and the displacement of the cantilever base [382]. Second, the deflection can be converted into the force under assumption that the cantilever is a harmonic oscillator with a certain spring constant. Several methods have been developed for calibration of the spring constant [383,384]. Third, the shape of the probe apex as well as its chemical structure has to be characterised. Spherical colloidal particles of known radius (ca. 10 pm) and composition can be used as force probes because they provide more reliable and reproducible data compared to poorly defined SFM tips [385]. 

In anisotropic materials, the electronic bonds may have different polarizabilities for different directions (you may think of different, orientation-dependent spring constants for the electronic harmonic oscillator). Remembering that only the E-vector of the light interacts with the electrons, we may use polarized light to test the polarizability of the material in different directions, lno is one of the most important electro-optic materials and we use it as an example. The common notations are shown in Figure 4.7. If the E-vector is in plane with the surface of the crystal, the wave is called a te wave. In this example, the te wave would experience the ordinary index na of LiNbOs (nG 2.20). If we rotate the polarization by 90°, the E-ve ctor will be vertical to the surface and the wave is called tm. In lno, it will experience the extraordinary index ne 2.29. Therefore these two differently polarized waves will propagate with different phase velocities v c/n. In the example of Figure 4.7, the te mode is faster than the tm mode. 

The above derivation will be extended to a well -behaved interaction potential, U(z), for which (7(0) — oo U oo) —0 and has a minimum at a distance z0. In the vicinity of the minimum of the enthalpy (per unit area) H(z) = U(z) + pz, the potential will be approximated by a harmonic one, with the effective spring constant B = iiAH(z)/dz%=Z(] , where z0 is the solution of <>H(z)/iiz = 0. It will be assumed that the areas of the small independent surfaces into which the interfaces are decomposed are still given by eq 27, but... 

In Figure 6, the pressure (a) and the root mean square fluctuation (b) are plotted as functions of the average thickness ofthe film, for Kc = 10 x ICC19 J and for (1) the anharmonic (eq 32) and (2) the harmonic (eq 23) interaction potentials. The spring constant for the second case was obtained from the harmonic approximation of eq 32 around its minimum, at p = 0. 

---