Hard acids/bases

In conclusion, the C/E ratios for donors (acids) indicate whether hardness or softness is most important in interactions of a particular donor (acid), but softness or hardness so defined does not enable one to predict even the relative strength of interaction towards a soft or hard acid (base) because the magnitude of the C and E numbers are lost when the ratio is taken. 

Which catalyst should be chosen for a given reaction will depend upon chemical, steric, and mechanistic factors. The application of Pearson s soft and hard acid-base (SHAB) principle has often proved a valuable qualitative guide as to suitable surface sites for a particular reactant. In fact, certain solids actually owe their catalytic power to attached Bronsted or Lewis acid and base groups as exemplified by weak acid ion exchange resins (Sect. 2.3), alumina (Sect. 3.2), and sometimes charcoals. Steric aspects can be con-... 

These results may be understood in the context of soft-hard acid-base theory.As mentioned earlier, the Fischer carbene complexes can be regarded as soft electrophiles, especially the alkylthio complexes. Hence, the adducts 99 formed by the reaction of 98b with a thiolate ion nucleophile enjoy enhanced stability due to the symbiotic effect of adding a soft nucleophile. This stabilization apparently reduces the need for additional stabilization by the phenyl substituent, which translates to a reduced p(Ki) value. 

In a short paragraph, rationalize why ionic forces should be more important in hard-hard—acid-base interactions than in soft-soft. 

On the other hand, the actual endeavor gives insight also into the type of chemical bonding in accordance with the acid-base bonding eharacteriza-tion all considered FD computed molecules are of hard-hard acid-base interaction type, although with different resulting maximum hardness values. 

From the bonding perspective all discussed bases originate in hard-hard acid-base interactions in accordance with the introduced maximum hardness criteria. 

According to soft and hard acid base (SHAB) principle, the hard oxygen donor of crown ethers prefer alkali metal ions and lanthanide cations because these are considered as hard adds. Thus it should not be difficult to obtain... 

The Hard-Soft-Add-Base (HSAB) theory was developed by Pearson in 1963. According to this theory, Lewis acids and Lewis bases are divided into two groups on one hand hard acids and bases, which are usually small, weakly polarizable species with highly localised charges, and on the other hand soft acids and bases which are large, polarizable species with delocalised charges. A selection of Lewis acids, ordered according to their hardness in aqueous solution is presented in Table 1.3. 

The theory predicts high stabilities for hard acid - hard base complexes, mainly resulting from electrostatic interactions and for soft acid - soft base complexes, where covalent bonding is also important Hard acid - soft base and hard base - soft acid complexes usually have low stability. Unfortunately, in a quantitative sense, the predictive value of the HSAB theory is limited. Thermodynamic analysis clearly shows a difference between hard-hard interactions and soft-soft interactions. In water hard-hard interactions are usually endothermic and occur only as a result of a gain in entropy, originating from a liberation of water molecules from the hydration shells of the... 

The second important influence of the solvent on Lewis acid - Lewis base equilibria concerns the interactions with the Lewis base. Consequently the Lewis addity and, for hard Lewis bases, especially the hydrogen bond donor capacity of tire solvent are important parameters. The electron pair acceptor capacities, quantified by the acceptor number AN, together with the hydrogen bond donor addities. O, of some selected solvents are listed in Table 1.5. Water is among the solvents with the highest AN and, accordingly, interacts strongly witli Lewis bases. This seriously hampers die efficiency of Lewis-acid catalysis in water. 

In summary, water is clearly an extremely bad solvent for coordination of a hard Lewis acid to a hard Lewis base. Hence, catalysis of Diels-Alder reactions in water is expected to be difficult due to the relative inefficiency of the interactions between the Diels-Alder reactants and the Lewis-acid catalyst in this medium. 

Analogously, water is extremely efficient in weakening hard Lewis add - hard Lewis base interactions. Consequently, when aiming at catalysis by hard Lewis adds, the inefficiency of the interaction between the catalyst and the substrate is a serious problem. Strangely enough, this characteristic of water is not recognised by many researchers working with hard Lewis acids in... 

Chemical Properties. Although the chemical properties of the trivalent lanthanides are quite similar, some differences occur as a consequence of the lanthanide contraction (see Table 3). The chemical properties of yttrium are very similar too, on account of its external electronic stmcture and ionic radius. Yttrium and the lanthanides are typical hard acids, and bind preferably with hard bases such as oxygen-based ligands. Nevertheless they also bind with soft bases, typicaUy sulfur and nitrogen-based ligands in the absence of hard base ligands. 

Bases of low polarizabiUty such as fluoride and the oxygen donors are termed hard bases. The corresponding class a cations are called hard acids the class b acids and the polarizable bases are termed soft acids and soft bases, respectively. The general rule that hard prefers hard and soft prefers soft prevails. A classification is given in Table 3. Whereas the divisions are arbitrary, the trends are important. Attempts to provide quantitative gradations of "hardness and softness" have appeared (14). Another generaUty is the usual increase in stabiUty constants for divalent 3t5 ions that occurs across the row of the Periodic Table through copper and then decreases for zinc (15). 

Oxidation—Reduction. Redox or oxidation—reduction reactions are often governed by the hard—soft base rule. For example, a metal in a low oxidation state (relatively soft) can be oxidized more easily if surrounded by hard ligands or a hard solvent. Metals tend toward hard-acid behavior on oxidation. Redox rates are often limited by substitution rates of the reactant so that direct electron transfer can occur (16). If substitution is very slow, an outer sphere or tunneling reaction may occur. One-electron transfers are normally favored over multielectron processes, especially when three or more species must aggregate prior to reaction. However, oxidative addition... 

R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85 3533 (1963) T. L. Ho, Hard and Soft Acids and Bases in Organic Chemistry, Academic Press, New York, 1977 W. B. Jensen, The Lewis Acid-Base Concept, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1980, Chapter 8. 

The strength of the complexation is a function of both the donor atom and the metal ion. The solvent medium is also an important factor because solvent molecules that are potential electron donors can compete for the Lewis acid. Qualitative predictions about the strength of donor-acceptor complexation can be made on the basis of the hard-soft-acid-base concept (see Section 1.2.3). The better matched the donor and acceptor, the stronger is the complexation. Scheme 4.3 gives an ordering of hardness and softness for some neutral and ionic Lewis acids and bases. 

STRUCTURE-REACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS Table 7-15. Examples of Hard-Soft Acid-Bases... 

These concepts play an important role in the Hard and Soft Acid and Base (HSAB) principle, which states that hard acids prefer to react with hard bases, and vice versa. By means of Koopmann s theorem (Section 3.4) the hardness is related to the HOMO-LUMO energy difference, i.e. a small gap indicates a soft molecule. From second-order perturbation theory it also follows that a small gap between occupied and unoccupied orbitals will give a large contribution to the polarizability (Section 10.6), i.e. softness is a measure of how easily the electron density can be distorted by external fields, for example those generated by another molecule. In terms of the perturbation equation (15.1), a hard-hard interaction is primarily charge controlled, while a soft-soft interaction is orbital controlled. Both FMO and HSAB theories may be considered as being limiting cases of chemical reactivity described by the Fukui ftinction. 

For the activation of a substrate such as 19a via coordination of the two carbonyl oxygen atoms to the metal, one should expect that a hard Lewis acid would be more suitable, since the carbonyl oxygens are hard Lewis bases. Nevertheless, Fu-rukawa et al. succeeded in applying the relative soft metal palladium as catalyst for the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between 1 and 19a (Scheme 6.36) [79, 80]. They applied the dicationic Pd-BINAP 54 as the catalyst, and whereas this type of catalytic reactions is often carried out at rt or at 0°C, the reactions catalyzed by 54 required heating at 40 °C in order to proceed. In most cases mixtures of endo-21 and exo-21 were obtained, however, high enantioselectivity of up to 93% were obtained for reactions of some derivatives of 1. 

From the data, the liquid is shown to have tetrahedrally coordinated aluminium with three chlorines and the isocyanate group attached. The neutron data clearly shows nitrogen, as opposed to sulfur, coordination to the aluminium center, forming an A1C13NCS species, which is consistent with a hard base/hard acid interaction as compared with the softer sulfur donation. It was also possible to show that a tetrahedral chloride environment is present around the lithium. 

---