Hamiltonian operator defined

Because the Hamiltonian operator defined by Eq. (4.32) is separable, its many-electron eigenfunctions can be constructed as products of one-electron eigenfunctions. That is... 

Up until now, little has been said about time. In classical mechanics, complete knowledge about the system at any time t suffices to predict with absolute certainty the properties of the system at any other time t. The situation is quite different in quantum mechanics, however, as it is not possible to know everything about the system at any time t. Nevertheless, the temporal behavior of a quantum-mechanical system evolves in a well defined way drat depends on the Hamiltonian operator and the wavefiinction T" according to the last postulate... 

Each electron in the system is assigned to either molecule A or B, and Hamiltonian operators and for each molecule defined in tenns of its assigned electrons. The unperturbed Hamiltonian for the system is then 0 = - A perturbation XH consists of tlie Coulomb interactions between the nuclei and... 

Since the Hamiltonian operator is written in terms of the variable rather than X, we should express the eigenstates in terms of as well. Accordingly, we define the functions 0( ) by the relation... 

In this equation, H, the Hamiltonian operator, is defined by H = — (h2/8mir2)V2 + V, where h is Planck s constant (6.6 10 34 Joules), m is the particle s mass, V2 is the sum of the partial second derivative with x,y, and z, and V is the potential energy of the system. As such, the Hamiltonian operator is the sum of the kinetic energy operator and the potential energy operator. (Recall that an operator is a mathematical expression which manipulates the function that follows it in a certain way. For example, the operator d/dx placed before a function differentiates that function with respect to x.) E represents the total energy of the system and is a number, not an operator. It contains all the information within the limits of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that the exact position and velocity of a microscopic particle cannot be determined simultaneously. Therefore, the information provided by Tint) is in terms of probability I/2 () is the probability of finding the particle between x and x + dx, at time t. 

Making use of the raising and lowering operators defined in Tables II and III, Hamiltonians (78) and (79) become finally... 

In the specific case of Hj defined here the secular equation is subscripted by the symbols a and b and the Hamiltonian operator is... 

In the Schrodinger picture operators in the case of a closed system do not depend explicitly on the time, but the state vector is time dependent. However, the expectation values are generally functions of the time. The commutator of the Hamiltonian operator H= —(h/2iri)(d/dt) and another operator A, is defined by... 

The actual form of the Hamiltonian operator hp does not have to be defined at this moment. As in standard perturbation theory, it is assumed that the solution of the electronic structure problem of the combined Hamiltonian HKS +HP can be described as the solution y/(0) of HKS, corrected by a small additional linear-response wavefunction /b//(,). Only these response orbitals will explicitly depend on time - they will follow the oscillations of the external perturbation and adopt its time dependency. Thus, the following Ansatz is made for the solution of the perturbed Hamiltonian HKS +HP ... 

We can now consider explicitly how configurations interact to produce electronic states. Our first task is to define the Hamiltonian operator. In order to simplify our analysis, we adopt a Hamiltonian which consists of only one electron terms and we set out to develop electronic states which arise from one electron configuration mixing. 

Since 1 have assumed that ij/ is normalized to 1, the trace of is also 1 and the trace of P2 is N N — 1). We now define the reduced Hamiltonian operator... 

Recall that in his Theorems 3 and 4 Hans Kummer [3] defined a contraction operator, L, which maps a linear operator on A-space onto an operator on p-space and an expansion operator, E, which maps an operator on p-space onto an operator on A-space. Note that the contraction and expansion operators are super operators in the sense that they act not on spaces of wavefunctions but on linear spaces consisting of linear operators on wavefunction spaces. If the two-particle reduced Hamiltonian is defined as... 

One simple form of the Schrodinger equation—more precisely, the time-independent, nonrelativistic Schrodinger equation—you may be familiar with is Hx i = ty. This equation is in a nice form for putting on a T-shirt or a coffee mug, but to understand it better we need to define the quantities that appear in it. In this equation, H is the Hamiltonian operator and v i is a set of solutions, or eigenstates, of the Hamiltonian. Each of these solutions,... 

This is a post Born-Oppenheimer scheme. It retains the essential idea of separability but the eleetronie base functions are diabatic functions. These functions are obtained from one Hamiltonian operator, namely the electronic operator defined in eq. (5). 

To solve Eq. (7.11), we need to know how to evaluate matrix elements of the type defined by Eq. (7.12). To simplify matters, we may note that the Hamiltonian operator is composed only of one- and two-electron operators. Thus, if two CSFs differ in their occupied orbitals by 3 or more orbitals, every possible integral over electronic coordinates hiding in the r.h.s. of Eq. (7.12) will include a simple overlap between at least one pair of different, and hence orthogonal, HF orbitals, and the matrix element will necessarily be zero. For the remaining cases of CSFs differing by two, one, and zero orbitals, the so-called Condon-Slater rules, which can be found in most quantum chemistry textbooks, detail how to evaluate Eq. (7.12) in terms of integrals over the one- and two-electron operators in the Hamiltonian and the HF MOs. 

Equation (9.32) is also useful to the extent it suggests die general way in which various spectral properties may be computed. The energy of a system represented by a wave function is computed as the expectation value of the Hamiltonian operator. So, differentiation of the energy with respect to a perturbation is equivalent to differentiation of the expectation value of the Hamiltonian. In the case of first derivatives, if the energy of the system is minimized with respect to the coefficients defining die wave function, the Hellmann-Feynman theorem of quantum mechanics allows us to write... 

As noted above, however, the Hamiltonian defined by Eqs. (4.32) and (4.33) does not include interelectronic repulsion, computation of which is vexing because it depends not on one electron, but instead on all possible (simultaneous) pairwise interactions. We may ask, however, how useful is the Hartree-product wave function in computing energies from the correct Hamiltonian That is, we wish to find orbitals xfr that minimize (4>hp H 4>hp). By applying variational calculus, one can show that each such orbital i/ V is an eigenfunction of its own operator defined by... 

---