Hamiltonian hopping

Hamiltonian hopping, as any other version of parallel tempering, is highly efficient if it is implemented on parallel computer architectures. In a stratified FEP calculation involving N states of the system, the simulations of the different A states are carried out in parallel on separate processors. After a predefined number of steps, A ampie, N/2 swaps between two randomly chosen simulation cells are attempted [38]. This procedure is illustrated in Fig. 2.11. Acceptance of the proposed exchange between cells i and j is ruled by the following probability [39]  

Hamiltonian representative of state a between simulation cells i and j. rand[0 l] represents a uniform random number generated from 0.0 rand[0 l] 1.0. If the random exchange for a given pair of A states is rejected, the simulation cells are swapped back. Nsampie steps are being performed again, until the next exchange. 

---

Tight-binding approximation (TBA) Hiickel-Hubbard Hamiltonian Hopping integral t Peierls distortion Magnetic material Nonmagnetic material... 

An important property of the electron Hamiltonian (Eq. (3.3)) is that for arbitrary hopping amplitudes the spectrum of the single-electrons slates is symmetric with respect to c=0 if is the electron amplitude on site n of an eigenstate with energy c, then the state with amplitudes —)"< > is also an eigenstate, with energy -c. In particular, in the uniformly dimerized stale, the gap between the empty conduction and the completely filled valence bands ranges from -A, to A(). 

In the Hamiltonian Eq. (3.39) the first term is the harmonic lattice energy given by Eq. (3.12). It depends only on A iU, i.e., the part of the order parameter that describes the lattice distortions. On the other hand, the electron Hamiltonian Hcl depends on A(.v), which includes the changes of the hopping amplitudes due to both the lattice distortion and the disorder. The free electron part of Hel is given by Eq. (3.10), to which we also add a term Hc 1-1-1 that describes the Coulomb interne-... 

Muller and Stock [227] used the vibronic coupling model Hamiltonian, Section III.D, to compare surface hopping and Ehrenfest dynamics with exact calculations for a number of model cases. The results again show that the semiclassical methods are able to provide a qualitative, if not quantitative, description of the dynamics. A large-scale comparison of mixed method and quantum dynamics has been made in a study of the pyrazine absorption spectrum, including all 24 degrees of freedom [228]. Here a method related to Ehrenfest dynamics was used with reasonable success, showing that these methods are indeed able to reproduce the main features of the dynamics of non-adiabatic molecular systems. 

At this point, we have reached the stage where we can describe the adatom-substrate system in terms of the ANG Hamiltonian (Muscat and Newns 1978, Grimley 1983). We consider the case of anionic chemisorption ( 1.2.2), where a j-spin electron in the substrate level e, below the Fermi level (FL) eF, hops over into the affinity level (A) of the adatom, whose j-spin electron resides in the lower ionization level (I), as in Fig. 4.1. Thus, the intra-atomic electron Coulomb repulsion energy on the adatom (a) is... 

The interest here is in the energy levels of molecular systems. It is well known that an understanding of these energy levels requires quantum mechanics. The use of quantum mechanics requires knowledge of the Hamiltonian operator Hop which, in Cartesian coordinates, is easily derived from the classical Hamiltonian. Throughout this chapter quantum mechanical operators will be denoted by subscript op . If the classical Hamiltonian function H is written in terms of Cartesian momenta and of interparticle distances appropriate for the system, then the rule for transforming H to Hop is quite straightforward. Just replace each Cartesian momentum component... 

The Schrodinger equation for nuclear motion contains a Hamiltonian operator Hop,nuc consisting of the nuclear kinetic energy and a potential energy term which is Eeiec(S) of Equation 2.7. Thus... 

In the 2-level limit a perturbative approach has been used in two famous problems the Marcus model in chemistry and the small polaron model in physics. Both models describe hopping of an electron that drags the polarization cloud that it is formed because of its electrostatic coupling to the enviromnent. This enviromnent is the solvent in the Marcus model and the crystal vibrations (phonons) in the small polaron problem. The details of the coupling and of the polarization are different in these problems, but the Hamiltonian formulation is very similar. ... 

Again, as in the one-band case, it is necessary to perform self-consistent calculations (for a given previously converged po(T) set) till the overall convergence is reached i.e. the on-site effective levels as well as the hoppings are converged. Once achieved, the effective Hamiltonian iLg// can be used... 

---