Guidance, written

Environment Agency - www.environment-agency.gov.uk. Much guidance written by agency staff is available for download. The CLEA pages contain errata, FAQ and software update information. 

A properly written HASP should contain worker health and safety program information, guidance, and alternatives. The HASP should quickly answer the following questions What hazards are present and How can we make sure that the tasks will be performed safely The following general guidelines will help to answer these questions ... 

Not performing monitoring that is required hy the SSHAP may have potentially serious consequences. For noise monitoring, guidance should he written into the plan that specifies when noise monitoring will he performed. For instance, how should one handle the following situation Let s say you are on site hut you do not have a sound level meter. At what point do you need to monitor One rule of thumb for this situation is as follows if you cannot conduct a normal conversation with fellow employees that are within three feet, you are likely at or above 85dBA. Your plan should state this. And it should state when and if the site would need to have a sound level meter on site. 

At this stage in planning, the essential study design information listed below should be determined and a written study plan (i.e., protocol) including these key study details prepared. A formal, pre-approved study plan is required for field soil dissipation studies conducted under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). A written study plan for non-GLP studies is highly recommended since the document serves as valuable guidance for study personnel. 

Other significant changes are the replacement of the existing chapter on Crystallisation by an entirely new chapter written with expert guidance from Professor J. W. Mullin, the author of the standard textbook on that topic. The other chapters have all been updated and additional Examples and Solutions incorporated in the text. Several additional Problems have been added at the end, and solutions are available in the Solutions Manual, and now on the Butterworth-Heinemann website. 

This chapter focuses on approaches to the validation of high-performance liquid chromatography methods based on regulatory guidance documents and accepted industry practices. The information in this chapter gives a brief review of the reasons for performing method validation and the regulations that describe this activity. Individual validation parameters are discussed in relation to the type of method to be validated. Examples of typical validation conditions are presented with references to additional information on individual topics. This chapter was written to help analysts responsible for method validation. 

Apart from the qualification dossiers provided by vendors there seems, at present, to be very little information published on the performance of an operational qualification for capillary electrophoresis (CE) instruments other than a chapter in Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance. The chapter, written by Nichole E. Baryla of Eli Lilly Canada, Inc, discusses the various functions (injection, separation, and detection) within the instrument and provides guidance on the type of tests, including suggested acceptance criteria, that may be performed to ensure the correct working of the instrument. These include injection reproducibility and linearity, temperature and voltage stability, detector accuracy, linearity, and noise. 

There are many methods of analyzing variability and uncertainty and many ways of presenting the results. Inappropriate use of these methods leads to misleading results, and experts differ on what is appropriate. Disagreement about which methods are appropriate will result in wasted resources, conflict over findings, and reduced credibility with decision makers and the public. T here is, therefore, a need to reach a consensus on how to choose and use appropriate methods, and to present this in the form of guidance for prospective users. Written in a clear and concise style, the book examines how to use probabilistic methods within a risk-based decision paradigm. 

Written documentation of change control procedures must exist to provide a reference and guidance for management of the ongoing software change and maintenance process. All steps in this process should be explained or clarified, and the procedures should be available to all system users. 

The first SOP that should be written is the SOP for writing SOPs. This SOP should contain the guidance for the content of each SOP, the numbering system for SOPs, and the system for review, revision, and acceptance of SOPs. Take the time to plan the system so it can grow with the lab and not become too cumbersome. 

---