Growth interface structure

Here r is the distance between the centers of two atoms in dimensionless units r = R/a, where R is the actual distance and a defines the effective range of the potential. Uq sets the energy scale of the pair-interaction. A number of crystal growth processes have been investigated by this type of potential, for example [28-31]. An alternative way of calculating solid-liquid interface structures on an atomic level is via classical density-functional methods [32,33]. 

Typical surfaces observed in Ising model simulations are illustrated in Fig. 2. The size and extent of adatom and vacancy clusters increases with the temperature. Above a transition temperature (T. 62 for the surface illustrated), the clusters percolate. That is, some of the clusters link up to produce a connected network over the entire surface. Above Tj, crystal growth can proceed without two-dimensional nucleation, since large clusters are an inherent part of the interface structure. Finite growth rates are expected at arbitrarily small values of the supersaturation. 

After clusters attain a critical size in the system and the nucleation stage is complete, the growth stage commences in a narrower sense. Since the structure is already formed, the solute component will be incorporated into the crystal at the expense of a much smaller energy than that necessary for nucleation. Here, the interface structure between the solid and liquid phases that appeared as a result of... 

Kossel [8] and Stranski [9] were the first to focus attention on the interface structure, after considering the experimental results obtained by Volmer [10], who demonstrated the existence of surface diffusion. It thus became possible to discuss the mechanism of crystal growth at an atomic level, starting from these analyses. 

The atomic images at diamond/substrate interfaces is shown later. The presence or absence and the structures of the interface layers depend on the method of substrate pretreatment, the diamond CVD method and the growth conditions used. The investigation of the atomic interface structures will give us useful insight into the nucleation and heteroepitaxial growth of diamond. 

Huitema, H. E. A., Vlot, M. J., and van der Eerden, J. P., Simulations of crystal growth from Lennard-Jones melt Detailed measurements of the interface structure. 7. Chem. Phys. Ill, 4714 (1999). 

Schaefer, D.W. et al.. Fractal geometry of colloidal aggregates, Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 2371, 1984. Hurd, A.J. and Flower, W.L., In situ growth and structure of fractal silica aggregates in a flame, J. Colloid Interface Set, 122, 178, 1988. 

We can distinguish between the interface structure of the embryo, B, and the particle. A, as shown in 3.1.30., given on the next page. In this case, we have classified the nucleation processes in terms how well the lattices match each other. That is, how well the embryo lattice matches that of the nucleus and the ultimate particle. You will note that the embryo has to form first before it is transformed into the larger nucleus, which in turn is the basis for growth of the peU ticle. 

One of the most important results of theoretical investigations of crystal growth has been the quantification of the effect of solvents on crystal interface structure. In particular, a key parameter, called the a-factor, has been developed from fundamental theories that allows identification of likely growth mechanisms based only on solute and solution properties. 

As shown in this chapter, the solvent can influence crystal product quality through its effect on crystallization kinetics, solution thermodynamics, and crystal interface structure. However, in many instances, the presence of impurities, reaction by-products, or corrosion products in the commercial system can override the solvent-induced behavior, yielding results different from those obtained in pure solvent. The strong influence of impurities at the parts per million level stems from the unique ability of certain impurities to adsorb at key growth sites on the crystal growth surface, as discussed in detail in Section 3.6. 

The results of one such calculation are shown as solid curves in Fig. 5.15 [5.110]. Additional generalized curves and closed-form solutions appear in the references [5.14, 15, 89, 92, 93, 95, 96, 101, 104, 110]. The various solutions all agree on the importance of low recombination velocity at the substrate/active layer growth interface and thus on the importance of low lattice mismatch. They also indicate that near threshold the quantum efficiency can be higher in transmission than in the reflection mode owing to one added optical reflection at the vacuum surface [5.95]. From the various separate models have come several versions of an optimum structure, but all are similar in general dimensions and structure as outlined above. 

Applications of XPS are found in the broad domain of materials science, involving quantitative surface analysis and stoichiometry determinations, the study of layer growth phenomena, the determination of the oxidation state and the chemical environment of elements, and the investigation of interface structures and compositions. 

---