Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Group contribution methods distribution

This equation is quite accurate in comparison with group contributing methods [40] or other predictive LSER methods [41]. For compounds where the solvatochromic parameters are known, the mean absolute error in log Dy is about 0.16. It is usually less than 0.3 if solvatochromic parameters of the solute and solvent must be estimated according to empirical rules [42], In contrast to the prediction of gas-liquid distribution coefficients, which is usually easier, the LSER method allows a robust estimation of liquid-liquid distribution coefficients. However, these equations always involve empirical terms, despite their being physico-chemically founded thermodynamic models. However, this is considered due to the fundamental character of the solvatochromic scales. [Pg.323]

Most published data of the heat of formation are for the components at the Ideal gas state. Heats of formation at the liquid state can be evaluated by subtracting heats of vaporization at the temperature of Interest from heats of formation at the gas state (AH fg). For the present system, all AH fg values are available except that of the dl-Isopropylbenzenes. The values of AH°fg of dl-lsopropylbenzenes were obtained by group contribution methods and averaged to present the average Isomer distribution observed in the reaction. [Pg.378]

A recent alternative to group-contribution activity-coefficient estimation methods is based on interactions between surface charge distributions (determined by quantum-mechanical calculations) of molecules in solution. The solvation model used for the charge-distribution calculation is known as COSMO the most widely used method based on this technique is called COSMO-RS [47]. [Pg.12]

Nowhere is the contribution of spectroscopic studies more emphatic than in application to the delineation of structural types in the heavier feedstocks. This has been necessary because of the unknown nature of these feedstocks by refiners. One particular example is the n.d.M. method (ASTM D-3238) which is designed for the carbon distribution and structural group analysis of petroleum oils. Later investigators have taken structural group analysis several steps further than the n.d.M. method. [Pg.87]

A different approach to mention here because it has some similarity to QM/MM is called RISM-SCF [5], It is based on a QM description of the solute, and makes use of some expressions of the integral equation of liquids (a physical approach that for reasons of space we cannot present here) to obtain in a simpler way the information encoded in the solvent distribution function used by MM and QM/MM methods. Both RISM-SCF and QM/MM use this information to define an effective Hamiltonian for the solute and both proceed step by step in improving the description of the solute electronic distribution and solvent distribution function, which in both methods are two coupled quantities. There is in this book a contribution by Sato dedicated to RISM-SCF to which the reader is referred. Sato also includes a mention of the 3D-RISM approach [6] which introduces important features in the physics of the model. In fact the simulation-based methods we have thus far mentioned use a spherically averaged radial distribution function, p(r) instead of a full position dependent function p(r) expression. For molecules of irregular shape and with groups of different polarity on the molecular periphery the examination of the averaged p(r) may lead to erroneous conclusions which have to be corrected in some way [7], The 3D version we have mentioned partly eliminates these artifacts. [Pg.4]

As described earlier, one of the first methods used to obtain PSD from the Dubinin equation is the so-called Dubinin-Stoeckli method [38-43], For strongly activated carbons with a heterogeneous collection of micropores, the overall adsorption isotherm is considered as a convolution of contributions from individual pore groups. Integrating the summation and assuming a normal Gaussian equation for the distribution of MPV with respect to the K parameter (Equation 4.19), Stoeckli obtained an equation useful to estimate the micro-PSD. [Pg.130]


See other pages where Group contribution methods distribution is mentioned: [Pg.374]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.23]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.336 ]




SEARCH



Group contribution methods

Group contributions

Group method

© 2024 chempedia.info