Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Normalized gaussians

In order to find the constant factor which will ensure normalization of the gaussian function we must calculate its integral over all values of the variable. This integral is most easily performed by using Gauss s trick of taking the square root of the square of the [Pg.655]

In the limit of a oo this function tends to an infinitely sharp spike centered at r = ro which integrates to unity, that is, a properly defined 5-function (compare with Eq. (G.54), with = 1/a). [Pg.656]

The above derivation provides an easy way of calculating the even moments of the normalized gaussian, by simply taking derivatives with respect to of both sides of Eq. (G.72)  [Pg.656]


It is important to verify that the simulation describes the chemical system correctly. Any given property of the system should show a normal (Gaussian) distribution around the average value. If a normal distribution is not obtained, then a systematic error in the calculation is indicated. Comparing computed values to the experimental results will indicate the reasonableness of the force field, number of solvent molecules, and other aspects of the model system. [Pg.62]

The particle size distribution of ball-milled metals and minerals, and atomized metals, follows approximately the Gaussian or normal distribution, in most cases when the logarithn of die diameter is used rather dran the simple diameter. The normal Gaussian distribution equation is... [Pg.202]

The reason for calling equation 8.3-1 a "Gaussian diffusion model" is because it has the form of the normal/Gaussian distribution (equation 2.5-2). Concentration averages for long time intervals may be calculated by averaging the concentrations at grid elements over which the plume passes. [Pg.323]

The normal (Gaussian) distribution is the most frequently used probability function and is given by... [Pg.95]

If we consider an absorption band showing a normal (Gaussian) distribution [Fig. 17.13(a)], we find [Figs. (b) and (d)] that the first- and third-derivative plots are disperse functions that are unlike the original curve, but they can be used to fix accurately the wavelength of maximum absorption, Amax (point M in the diagram). [Pg.668]

Consider the log normal (Gaussian) distribution, of which an example is given as follows ... [Pg.220]

For a normal (Gaussian) error distribution, the RMSE is by a factor of Jl larger than the mean absolute error, also denoted as mean unsigned error. The error distribution of log Sw prediction methods appears to be somewhat less inhomogeneous than a Gaussian distribution and typically leads to a ratio of RMSE/mean absolute error... [Pg.308]

Figure 16.6 TEM micrographs of titania-supported Au particles. The nominal thickness of An was (a) 0.13 nm (h) 0.78nm (c) 1.56nm (d) 2.33 nm. The Au deposition rate was 2.6 X 10 nms. Particle size distributions of Au for various deposition times are shown in the plot, with the distrihutions fitted to a normal Gaussian function. Figure 16.6 TEM micrographs of titania-supported Au particles. The nominal thickness of An was (a) 0.13 nm (h) 0.78nm (c) 1.56nm (d) 2.33 nm. The Au deposition rate was 2.6 X 10 nms. Particle size distributions of Au for various deposition times are shown in the plot, with the distrihutions fitted to a normal Gaussian function.
Fig. 3 The normalized Gaussian and its Fourier transform, a Gaussian in k space. Fig. 3 The normalized Gaussian and its Fourier transform, a Gaussian in k space.
If structure visualization by means of the IDF or CDF has shown that h and /i2 can be modeled by Gaussians, all the combined thickness distributions are Gaussians as well. Each normalized Gaussian is completely described by mean di and standard deviation o and Eq. (8.101) is reduced to a relation... [Pg.193]

A further consideration is that the value of the calculated nonlinearity will depend not only on the function that fits the data, we suspect that it will also depend on the distribution of the data along the X-axis. Therefore, for pedagogical purposes, here we will consider the situation for two common data distributions the uniform distribution and the Normal (Gaussian) distribution. [Pg.453]

As was shown, the conventional method for data reconciliation is that of weighted least squares, in which the adjustments to the data are weighted by the inverse of the measurement noise covariance matrix so that the model constraints are satisfied. The main assumption of the conventional approach is that the errors follow a normal Gaussian distribution. When this assumption is satisfied, conventional approaches provide unbiased estimates of the plant states. The presence of gross errors violates the assumptions in the conventional approach and makes the results invalid. [Pg.218]

A normal (gaussian) probability density function in one centered and standardized variable X reads... [Pg.205]

If abs (tail) is small (not zero) the result will be very close to a normal Gaussian as in function gauss. [Pg.39]

Figure 5. Frequency of D, as observed (bar graph) and as predicted by MM3, using a dielectric constant of 4.0. The squares are the fractions calculated at each 0.1 A, and the curve is a normal gaussian curve that was fitted to three of the predicted points. Figure 5. Frequency of D, as observed (bar graph) and as predicted by MM3, using a dielectric constant of 4.0. The squares are the fractions calculated at each 0.1 A, and the curve is a normal gaussian curve that was fitted to three of the predicted points.
The formation of a boundary between the dextran solution and the dextran solution containing PVP 360 (concentration 5 kg m 3) yields an apparently normal Gaussian distribution of the material detected by Schlieren optics. The various apparent diffusion coefficients obtained by an analysis of the Schlieren curves, which include diffusion coefficients obtained by the reduced height-area ratio method, the reduced second-moment and the width-at-half-height method, show the same qualitative behavior although quantitative differences do exist. This is seen in Fig. 7 where the... [Pg.126]

Boys (1950) proposed an alternative to the use of STOs. All that is required for there to be an analytical solution of the general four-index integral formed from such functions is that the radial decay of the STOs be changed from e to e. That is, the AO-like functions are chosen to have the form of a Gaussian function. The general functional form of a normalized Gaussian-type orbital (GTO) in atom-centered Cartesian coordinates is... [Pg.167]

Table 4-1 Ordinate and area for the normal (Gaussian) error curve,... Table 4-1 Ordinate and area for the normal (Gaussian) error curve,...

See other pages where Normalized gaussians is mentioned: [Pg.411]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.777]    [Pg.784]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.35]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info