Gradient selection preparative separation

Chapter 4 discusses the selection and optimization of mobile phases for successful separations in PLC. Chapter 5 details procedures for sample application and development of layers, and Chapter 6 complements Chapter 5 by dealing specifically with the use of horizontal chambers for the development of preparative layers, including linear, continuous, two-dimensional, gradient, circular, and anticircular modes. 

The particle size and size distribution of adsorbents for preparative purposes are higher and wider, respectively, compared to analytical ones. In addition, the adsorbent layer is much thicker and effectively overloaded with the compoimds. These items make resolution difficult, which must even be better than for quantitative separations as discussed in Section 5.1. These facts necessitate an excellent and superior strategy to hud the best separation, i.e., the mobile phase with the best selectivity (see Chapter 4). It was also shown that plates with a thickness gradient, called Uniplate-T taper plate [5], could improve resolution in the lower-Mp range. 

A simple and rapid RP-HPLC method was developed for the determination of retinoid in galenicals. Commercial preparations were diluted, filered and used for separation. Measurements were carried out in an ODS column (150 X 4.6 mm i.d. particle size 3 /xm). Solvents A and B were methanol-10 mM ammonium acetate (75 25, v/v) and methanol-THF (84 16, v/v), respectively. The flow rate was 0.8ml/min. Gradient conditions were 0-25 min, 0 per cent B 35 min, 100 per cent B, isocratic for 10 min. Typical chromatograms are shown in Fig. 2.37. The repeatability of peak area ranged between 0.48 -3.2 per cent for UV-DAD and 0.57 - 3.1 per cent for fluorescence detection. The reproducibility varied between 0.26 - 4.6 per cent. It was found that the method is precise, selective, sensitive and linear, therefore, it can be employed for the routine quality control of this class of drags [85],... 

Steps in method development (1) determine the goal of the analysis, (2) select a method of sample preparation, (3) choose a detector, and (4) use a systematic procedure to select solvent for isocratic or gradient elution. Aqueous acetonitrile, methanol, and tetrahydrofuran are customary solvents for reversed-phase separations. A separation can be optimized by varying several solvents or by using one solvent and temperature as the principal variables. If further resolution is required, flow rate can be decreased and you can use a longer column with smaller particle size. Criteria for a successful separation are 0.5 < < 20, resolution >2.0, operating... 

However, due to the artifacts resulting from oxidation, hydrolysis of esters or ethers, or isomerization of phenolics during pretreatment of wines, as well as due to the low recovery rates of some phenolics, analysis of wine phenolics via direct injection of the filtered wine into the chromatographic column is often selected (80,82-84). For the red wine and musts (80), which were injected directly into the HPLC without sample preparation, a ternary-gradient system was often employed for phenolic compounds. Twenty-two phenolic compounds, including 10 anthocyanins, were analyzed from red wine. The separation of cinnamic acid derivatives (313 nm),... 

In order to accumulate the data for a van Deemter plot (described above) it is necessary to carry out a series of separations on a preparative column of at least 50 mm diameter. This can be done isocratically or using the gradient and optimum load conditions selected above. However, if the study is done using gradient elution the gradient length should be reduced in proportion to increased flow rate. Suggested linear flow rates for this study are 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 and 135 cm/h. These flow rates correspond to approximately 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 cm3/min for a 50 mm diameter column. 

Preparative liquid chromatography (in opposition to analytical chromatography) introduces specific requirements, which are mostly related to the separation selectivity and the loadability of a solid phase rather than the separation efficiency or peak resolution. While analytical chromatography separations may use complex profiles of elution gradients, in most of the cases, preparative chromatography utilizes linear or step gradients or a combination of both. 

---