Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Goethite conductivity

Schwertmann, 1993). Such soils are characterized by a hydraulic conductivity somewhere in the profile which is too low to cope with the high rainfall, so that all pores will be filled with water for certain periods of time (see above). In this case, the oxygen supply is limited by the low level of O2 dissolved in the soil water (46 mg O2 at 25 °C) and reduction of Mn-oxides, nitrate and Fe oxides sets in. Soils containing Fe oxides are, therefore, redox-buffered (poised). The redox titration curve (Fig. 16.14) of a soil with 23 g kg Fe as Fe oxides shows buffering at two different pe -1- pH levels, one at ca. 11 and another at ca. 9, which indicate the presence of a more reducible (e. g. ferrihydrite) and a less reducible (e. g. goethite) Fe oxide, respectively, in accordance with their different solubilities (see Chap. 9). [Pg.463]

Titania, goethite and silica were used as adsorbents. Titanium dioxide (anatase) and silica powders were obtained commercially. Goethite was prepared from an FefNC solution by the precipitation of ferrihydrite.8 The suspension was held in a closed flask at 70°C for 60 hours. During this period the red brown suspension of ferrihydrite was converted to a yellow brown goethite. These oxides were washed with double distilled water to remove impurities, until the supernatant conductivity was below 2pS x cnT1. [Pg.384]

Varnish minerals were originally reported to be amorphous (Engel and Sharp, 1958), with goethite (Scheffer et al., 1963) and ferric chamosite (Washburn, 1969) as important components. Seminal research conducted with infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy at the California Institute of Technology revealed that the bulk of rock varnish... [Pg.257]

This method is also referred to as the miscible-displacement or continuous-flow method. In this method a thin disk of dispersed solid phase is deposited on a porous membrane and placed in a holder. A pump is used to maintain a constant flow velocity of solution through the thin disk and a fraction collector is used to collect effluent aliquots. A diagram of the basic experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2-6. A thin disk is used in an attempt to minimize diffusion resistances in the solid phase. Disk thickness, disk hydraulic conductivity, and membrane permeability determine the range of flow velocities that are achievable. Dispersion of the solid phase is necessary so that the transit time for a solute molecule is the same at all points in the disk. However, the presence of varying particle sizes and hence pore sizes may produce nonuniform solute transit times (Skopp and McCallister, 1986). This is more likely to occur with whole soils than with clay-sized particles of soil constituents. Typically, 1- or 2-g samples are used in kinetic studies on soils with the thin disk method, but disk thicknesses have not been measured. In their study of the kinetics of phosphate and silicate retention by goethite, Miller et al. (1989) estimated the thickness of the goethite disk to be 80 /xm. [Pg.36]

Fig. 3-9. Relaxation curves for molybdate adsorption on goethite (a) Typical p-jump relaxation curve showing change in conductivity vs. time for the goethite suspension and (b) semilog relaxation curves for the goethite suspension (from Zhang and Sparks, 1989). Fig. 3-9. Relaxation curves for molybdate adsorption on goethite (a) Typical p-jump relaxation curve showing change in conductivity vs. time for the goethite suspension and (b) semilog relaxation curves for the goethite suspension (from Zhang and Sparks, 1989).
The kinetic behavior of Cu in McLaren soil, during adsorption and desorption, is consistent with observation for other heavy metals and soils. In fact, several researchers have noted that not only are heavy metals strongly sorbed and exhibit slow desorption kinetics, but that the rate of desorption decreases with increasing reaction. Padmanabham (1983) conducted desorption experiments of Cu from goethite and concluded that Cu was sorbed in two different ways a fraction... [Pg.209]

A theoretical study for imitating the carbon cycling test in a laboratory has also been conducted. Wang et al. (2000b) found that pH can affect adsorption of DOC on goethite. The adsorption percentage of DOC shows a maximum at pH 5 6, and above 50% at pH 8.1. It shows that the adsorption can affect distributions of DOC in seawater. [Pg.89]

Column experiments were conducted to simulate the transport of oxoanion aquifers containing iron hydroxides. The Riedel de Haen Hfo material used in these column experiments exhibits a low specific surface area and contains a significant proportion of goethite. PHREEQC2 is equipped to model surface complexation of oxoanions onto iron hydroxides but a consistent data set of surface complexation constants is only available for amorphous hydrous ferric oxides. Tests were conducted to determine whether it is possible to use PHREEQC2 with this data set to model the oxoanion transport in the columns. If the data set of surface complexation constants is also suitable for the Riedel de Haen Hfo material than it should be sufficient to adjust the site density of the iron hydroxide surface in the model. [Pg.227]

Bruemmer et al. (55) studied Ni, Zn, and Cd sorption on goethite, a porous iron oxide known to have defects within the structure in which metals can be incorporated to satisfy charge imbalances. At pH 6, as reaction time increased from 2 hours to 42 days (at 293K), sorbed Ni increased from 12 to 70% of Ni removed from solution, and total increases in Zn and Cd sorption over this period increased 33 and 21%, respectively. The kinetics of Cd, Zn, and Ni were described well with a solution to Pick s second law (a linear relation with the square root of time). Bruemmer et al. (55) proposed that the uptake of the metal follows three-steps (i) adsorption of metals on external surfaces (ii) solid-state diffusion of metals from external to internal sites and (iii) metal binding and fixation at positions inside the goethite particle. They suggest that the second step is the rate-limiting step. However, they did not conduct microscopic level experiments to confirm the proposed mechanism. In view of more recent studies, it is likely that the formation of metal-nucleation products could have caused the slow metal sorption reactions observed by Bruemmer et al. (55). [Pg.117]

The goethite used was a concentrated suspension prepared by the Atkinson et al. method which had been washed many times with water to a constant, low conductivity and stored as an aqueous suspension in a plastic container since preparation. Although this material was not the same as that used in ref. 1, Its BET surface area of 80 m7g, measured using Ng adsorption, was Identical to the surface area of the goethite described In ref. 1. [Pg.479]

Hematite process. The leaching in the hematite process is the same as that used in the goethite process, but the precipitation of iron is conducted inside an autoclave at 180 to 200°C without neutrahzation ... [Pg.194]


See other pages where Goethite conductivity is mentioned: [Pg.478]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.877]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.1630]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.16]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.117 ]




SEARCH



Goethite

© 2024 chempedia.info