Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Genetic buffering

For the purposes of this study, hexaploid wheat and certain other polyploids are important because they are often subject to a so-called genetic buffering (c/. Mac Key, 1967), which permits tolerance of gross chromosomal aberrations and even loss of whole chromosomes. Such effects, no doubt, are of concern as a hazard to man from certain environmental factors. Wheat, in contrast to diploid barley and pea, offers the possibility to measure such effects inherited as gene mutations, i.e., affecting morphological characters. [Pg.78]

Several aspects affect the extent and character of taste and smell. People differ considerably in sensitivity and appreciation of smell and taste, and there is lack of a common language to describe smell and taste experiences. A hereditary or genetic factor may cause a variation between individual reactions, eg, phenylthiourea causes a bitter taste sensation which may not be perceptible to certain people whose general abiUty to distinguish other tastes is not noticeably impaired (17). The variation of pH in saUva, which acts as a buffer and the charge carrier for the depolarization of the taste cell, may influence the perception of acidity differently in people (15,18). Enzymes in saUva can cause rapid chemical changes in basic food ingredients, such as proteins and carbohydrates, with variable effects on the individual. [Pg.10]

Biomedical Applications. TRIS AMINO is used for a number of purposes in its pure form, it is an acidimetric standard the USP grade can be utilized intraveneously for therapeutic control of blood acidosis TRIS AMINO also is useful in genetic engineering as a buffering agent for enzyme systems, industrial protein purification, and electrophoresis. AMP has found use as a reagent in enzyme-linked immunoassays. The primary appHcation is for alkaline phosphatase assays. [Pg.19]

The development of biological tools to support DDI studies has paralleled the development of bioanalytical techniques. To better understand in vitro-in vivo (IVIV) correlations, the effects of differences in enzyme preparations and incubation conditions must be understood. Differences between enzyme preparations include nonspecific binding, the ratio of accessory proteins (cytochrome b5 and reductase) to CYPs and genetic variability differences in incubation conditions include buffer strength, the presence of inorganic cations and solvent effects. Understanding how biology influences enzymatic activity is crucial to accurate and consistent prediction of the inhibition potential. [Pg.206]

Electrophoretic Methods. Several electrophoretic procedures have been developed to fractionate or purify the various caseins (McKenzie 1971C Thompson 1971 Whitney 1977). Wake and Baldwin (1961) fractionated whole casein by zone electrophoresis on cellulose powder in 7 M urea and 0.02 ionic strength sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7 and 5°C. Payens and co-workers employed several somewhat different electrophoretic conditions for the fractionation and purification of the caseins on cellulose columns (Payens 1961 Schmidt and Payens 1963 Schmidt 1967). Three fractions, as-, k-, and /3-caseins, were separated at pH 7.5 and 30°C with 4.6 M urea-barbiturate buffer. The purification of asi-casein and the separation of the genetic variants of K-casein were accomplished by altering the electrophoretic conditions. Manson (1965) fractionated acid casein on a starch gel column stabilized by a density gradient at 25 °C. [Pg.130]

Electrophoresis on cellulose acetate strips has also been used for the rapid resolution of whey proteins (Bell and Stone 1979). Samples of a 10 1 concentrate of whey are applied to cellulose acetate strips which have been saturated with Tris-barbiturate buffer, pH 8.6, ionic strength 0.097, and the electrophoresis is performed at 225 V for 1 hr. This procedure separates not only the major whey proteins but also their genetic variants. [Pg.143]

Microporous carbon was also studied as a potential substrate for binding of AChE [24,35]. Discs cut from a commercial porous carbon rod were cleaned and then exposed to a solution of AChE in phosphate buffer for 20 h to allow for simple physisorption and chemisorption of the enzyme. Initial tests using electric eel AChE [35] gave linear detection of dichlorvos in the range 10 6-10 12M. The sensitivity of this method was increased still further by utilisation of the genetically engineered AChE mentioned earlier, with the detection limit of these systems being extended down to 10 17M [35]. [Pg.316]

The hybridisation event is affected by the concentration of DNA target, concentration and size of capture probe, temperature, hybridisation time and hybridisation buffer composition (pH, ionic strength, denaturalising chemical agents, etc.). The control of the experimental variables that affect the hybridisation event is very important in order to obtain an efficient and selective hybridisation. The detection of SNP or genetic mutations requires an efficient discrimination between mismatched and complementary strands. In most of the cases, the selectivity relies on the operating conditions of the assay as hybridisation buffer composition, hybridisation time and hybridisation temperature. [Pg.618]


See other pages where Genetic buffering is mentioned: [Pg.664]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1706]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.1752]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.1282]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.299]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info