Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General relaxation equation , mode

The relaxation equations for the time correlation functions are derived formally by using the projection operator technique [12]. This relaxation equation has the same structure as a generalized Langevin equation. The mode coupling theory provides microscopic, albeit approximate, expressions for the wavevector- and frequency-dependent memory functions. One important aspect of the mode coupling theory is the intimate relation between the static microscopic structure of the liquid and the transport properties. In fact, even now, realistic calculations using MCT is often not possible because of the nonavailability of the static pair correlation functions for complex inter-molecular potential. [Pg.71]

Lee and Park [263] derived a more general constitutive equation for immiscible blends. which compared well with the dynamic shear data of PS/ LLD P E blends over a full range of frequency and composition. Their model included the dissipative time evolution of Qand qjj, written as functions of (i) the degree of total relaxation, (ii) the size relaxation strongly dependent on concentration, viz. a and (iii) the breakup and shape relaxation, assumed dependent on (1— )- The parameters contain adjustable constants and depend on concentration as well as on the deformation mode. The interfacial tension coefficient was assumed to be constant, independent of As before [249, 264], the constitutive equation was written in form of three functions dq /dt, and Oy. The model predicts well the dynamic moduli of... [Pg.58]

Based on the generalized Langevin equation, the renormalized Rouse models suggest dynamic high- and low-mode-number limits as an implicit structural feature of this equation of motion. This is a stand-alone prediction of paramount importance independent of any absolute values of power law exponents that arise and are measured in the formalism and in experiment, respectively. The two limits manifesting themselves as power law spin-lattice relaxation dispersions were clearly identified in bulk melts of entangled polymers of diverse chemical species. [Pg.108]

In a conventional relaxation kinetics experiment in a closed reaction system, because of mass conservation, the system can be described in a single equation, e.g., SCc(t) = SCc(0)e Rt where R = ((Ca) + ( C b)) + kh- The forward and reverse rate constants are k and k t, respectively. In an open system A, B, and C, can change independently and so three equations, one each for A, B, and C, are required, each equation having contributions from both diffusion and reaction. Consequently, three normal modes rather than one will be required to describe the fluctuation dynamics. Despite this complexity, some general comments about FCS measurements of reaction kinetics are useful. [Pg.119]

We present in Section 2 the formalism giving the equations for the reduced density operator and for competing instantaneous and delayed dissipation. Section 3 presents matrix equations in a form suitable for numerical work, and the details of the numerical procedure used to solve the integrodiffer-ential equations with the two types of dissipative processes. In Section 4 on applications to adsorbates, results are shown for quantum state populations versus time for the dissipative dynamics of CO/Cu(001). The fast electronic relaxation to the ground electronic state is shown first without the slow relaxation of the frustrated translation mode of CO vibrations, for comparison with previous work, and this is followed by results with both fast and slow relaxation. In Section 5 we comment on the general conclusions that can be reached in problems involving both vibrational and electronic relaxation at surfaces. [Pg.365]

Although a theoretical approach has been desecrated as to how one can apply the generalized coupled master equations to deal with ultrafast radiationless transitions taking place in molecular systems, there are several problems and limitations to the approach. For example, the number of the vibrational modes is limited to less than six for numerical calculations. This is simply just because of the limitation of the computational resources. If the efficient parallelization can be realized to the generalized coupled master equations, the limitation of the number of the modes can be relaxed. In the present approach, the Markov approximation to the interaction between the molecule and the heat bath mode has been employed. If the time scale of the ultrashort measurements becomes close to the characteristic time of the correlation time of the heat bath mode, the Markov approximation cannot be applicable. In this case, the so-called non-Markov treatment should be used. This, in turn, leads to a more computationally demanding task. Thus, it is desirable to develop a new theoretical approach that allows a more efficient algorithm for the computation of the non-Markov kernels. Another problem is related to the modeling of the interaction between the molecule and the heat bath mode. In our model, the heat bath mode is treated as... [Pg.220]

Let us note, that the matrixes A and G are approximations of the real situation though, in any case, the zeroth eigenvalues of the matrixes must be zero and equation (4.1) for diffusive mode is valid, the other eigenvalues of matrix G depends, generally speaking, on the mode label. In fact, the written equations for the relaxation modes are implementation of the statements that the motion of a single macromolecule can be separated from others, and the motion of a single macromolecule can be expanded into an independent motion of modes. [Pg.64]

This relations are valid for small mode numbers, in any case, a -C M/Me. The index 5 in the above formula can be estimated theoretically (5 > 2) and empirically according to the measurements of the characteristics of viscoelasticity (5 2.4). It remains to be a dream to get a unified formula for relaxation times from the system of dynamic equations (3.37). One can expect that the all discussed relaxation branches will emerge as different limiting cases from one expression for general conformation branch. [Pg.78]

Our findings lead us in a number of useful directions. One of these directions is a generalization of our basic instantaneous approach to dynamics. Our original linear INM formalism assumed the potential energy was instantaneously harmonic, but that the coupling was instantaneously linear [Equation (15)]. We still need to retain the harmonic character of the potential to justify the existence of independent normal modes (at least inside the band), but we are free to represent the coupling by any instantaneously nonlinear function we wish. A rather accurate choice for vibrational relaxation, for example, is the instantaneous exponential form ... [Pg.195]

Equation 3.5, where v is the vibrational quantum number, means that only transitions between nearest vibrational states can directly occur in the case of the harmonic oscillator. This means that the 1R spectrum is generally mostly constituted hy fundamental transitions, that is, those associated with excitation from the fundamental state to the first excited state. This condition, however, is relaxed in the case of anharmonic oscillators, so that not only fundamental transitions but also overtone and combination modes (also called the harmonics, i.e. modes associated with the excitation from the fundamental state to a second or third excited state) can be sometimes observed, although they are usually weak. [Pg.99]

Anomalous rotational diffusion in a potential may be treated by using the fractional equivalent of the diffusion equation in a potential [7], This diffusion equation allows one to include explicitly in Frohlich s model as generalized to fractional dynamics (i) the influence of the dissipative coupling to the heat bath on the Arrhenius (overbarrier) process and (ii) the influence of the fast (high-frequency) intrawell relaxation modes on the relaxation process. The fractional translational diffusion in a potential is discussed in detail in Refs. 7 and 31. Here, just as the fractional translational diffusion treated in Refs. 7 and 31, we consider fractional rotational subdiffusion (0rotation about fixed axis in a potential Vo(< >)- We suppose that a uniform field Fi (having been applied to the assembly of dipoles at a time t = oo so that equilibrium conditions prevail by the time t = 0) is switched off at t = 0. In addition, we suppose that the field is weak (i.e., pFj linear response condition). [Pg.325]

In the time domain, the single-mode approximation, equation Eq. (191), is equivalent to assuming that the relaxation function Cy(t) as determined by the exact equation, Eq. (182) (which in general comprises an infinite number of Mittag-Leffler functions), may be approximated by one Mittag-Leffler function only, namely... [Pg.343]

Dynamic scattering can also provide information about relaxation modes of polymers at higher values of the wavevector q ( 7 >1). Equation (8.164) can be generalized to higher wavevectors and to semi-dilute and concentrated solutions by noticing that the decay of the... [Pg.349]

Clearly, a general theory able to naturally include other solvent modes in order to simulate a dissipative solute dynamics is still lacking. Our aim is not so ambitious, and we believe that an effective working theory, based on a self-consistent set of hypotheses of microscopic nature is still far off. Nevertheless, a mesoscopic approach in which one is not limited to the one-body model, can be very fruitful in providing a fairly accurate description of the experimental data, provided that a clever choice of the reduced set of coordinates is made, and careful analytical and computational treatments of the improved model are attained. In this paper, it is our purpose to consider a description of rotational relaxation in the formal context of a many-body Fokker-Planck-Kramers equation (MFPKE). We shall devote Section I to the analysis of the formal properties of multivariate FPK operators, with particular emphasis on systematic procedures to eliminate the non-essential parts of the collective modes in order to obtain manageable models. Detailed computation of correlation functions is reserved for Section II. A preliminary account of our approach has recently been presented in two Letters which address the specific questions of (1) the Hubbard-Einstein relation in a mesoscopic context [39] and (2) bifurcations in the rotational relaxation of viscous liquids [40]. [Pg.94]

The program is then simply to start at a high temperature, where p T) — Peq( ) lower the temperature at a fixed q<0. The result forp T) can then be used in (8.2) to (8.4) for to obtain results that can be compared directly with experiment. The only quantity that we must specify in addition to those in the equilibrium theory is the relaxation time r T). Since t(T ) is to describe the relaxation by diffusion of structural modes represented by the variation of p, it should have the same temperature dependence as the shear viscosity rj. That is, we suppose that the same microscopic movement processes underlie self-diffusion, viscosity, and structural relaxation. This supposition is consistent with existing theories and with a number of experimental results indicating that the activation enthalpy A A for volume or enthalpy relaxation is generally the same as the activation enthalpy for the viscosity tj. We therefore assume that r(T) can be expressed by the Doolittle equation. [Pg.509]


See other pages where General relaxation equation , mode is mentioned: [Pg.492]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.515]   


SEARCH



Mode equations

Relaxation equation

Relaxation mode

© 2024 chempedia.info