Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Galvanostatic experiment

The electrochemical impedance may be obtained from potentiostatic or galvanostatic experiments. Alternating current voltammetric techniques are well documented at the DME, as are various kinds of pulse techniques. The former has also been developed at rotating and tubular/channel electrodes. [Pg.427]

Now we wish to consider the electrochemical polarization with the help of selectively blocking electrodes (connected with the neutral phase at x=L, while x=0 is the position of the reversible electrode contact) on a more fundamental level3 15 210 225 231 and refer, to be specific, to a galvanostatic experiment on cells 3 and 4. We start with the steady state. [Pg.88]

In the last section the capacitive contribution was neglected. However, for some galvanostatic experiments this procedure is not possible. Various theoretical treatments have been developed to analyse chrono-potentiograms, but always with approximations that are difficult to justify, such as, for example, Ic constant ... [Pg.212]

Our third example, in which a current step is applied, could be called a galvanostatic experiment, in the sense that the current, rather than the potential, is the externally controlled parameter. [Pg.206]

Controlling the current through a cell is simpler than controlling the potential at an electrode, because only two elements of the cell, the working and counter electrodes, are involved in the control circuit. In galvanostatic experiments, one is usually interested in the potential of the working electrode with respect to a reference electrode, and circuitry is normally added to permit that measurement, but it makes no contribution to the control function. [Pg.644]

M. Ilieva and V. Tsakova, Copper modified poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Part I. Galvanostatic experiments, Synth. Met., 141,281-285 (2004). [Pg.334]

The second most common way to control the movement of the device is by imposing from the potentiostat or galvanostat the flow of a constant direct current between WE and CE a galvanostatic experiment. In this case, we can follow the evolution of the muscle potential (potential of the CP layer versus the RE) with time, recording the cronopotentiometric response. [Pg.1660]

L stainless steel Increased pitting potential Potentiodynamic and galvanostatic experiments 10% serum (Sousa and Barbara, 1991)... [Pg.438]

Galvanostatic experiments have been carried out at room temperature on DEFCs containing Pd/MWCNT, Pd-(Ni-Zn)/C, Pd-(Ni-Zn-P)/C or Pd/C anodes as well as on DMFCs and DGFCs containing a Pd/MWCNT anode. In all cases, the cathode was a Fe-Co Hypermec K-14 material and the sohd electrolyte was a Tokuyama A-006 membrane. " " The anode compartments were filled with 28.3 mmol of EtOH, 40.7 mmol of MeOH or 6.8 mmol of glycerol. Accurate mass balance determinations were performed by means of both C H NMR spectroscopy and ionic chromatography, using reference materials and calibration curves. [Pg.235]

Before 1900, electrochemical experiments focused on thermodynamic aspects and, thus, were reduced to potential measurements of systems, which were stationary or in equilibrium. But with time, scientists became interested in kinetics, i.e., systems away from equilibrium [1]. This was often realized by constant current (galvanostatic) experiments, which were for two reasons advantageous they were easily realized and guaranteed a constant reaction rate, which was relevant in some cases. Moreover, time dependent reactions could be monitored, if the potential was recorded versus time. These charging curves [2] were the main technique to follow electrode kinetics up to the 60s of the last century. [Pg.925]

Potentiostats were much later developed. The first completely electronic device was presented by Hickling in 1942 [3], and from 1960 most galvanostatic experiments were substituted by potentiostatic sweep techniques. [Pg.925]

Charge determination in cyclovoltammograms means more efforts such as graphic, numeric, or electronic integration. After 1960, however, when potentiostats, potential sweep generators, electronic integrators, and laboratory computers became available, the number of galvanostatic experiments decreased rapidly. [Pg.927]

The quality of galvanostat systems is nowadays almost perfect and allows, supported by computer and software, effective and convenient experiments. A dominance of potentiostatic experiments must be stated, but galvanostatic experiments may be advantageous in fast pulse applications, as constant current control requires no reference electrode. The iimer resistance of reference electrodes Rre may be large (>1 MQ), which means, together with an input capacity of the potentiostat Cm, a time cmistant... [Pg.927]


See other pages where Galvanostatic experiment is mentioned: [Pg.134]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.815]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.2727]    [Pg.3827]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.925]    [Pg.131]   


SEARCH



Galvanostat

Galvanostatic

Galvanostats

© 2024 chempedia.info