Fundamental universal constants

Equation 17.54 is a useful conclusion. The (translational) partition function, originally defined as an infinite sum of negative exponentials of the energy levels, is equal to an expression in terms of the mass of the gas particles, the absolute temperature, the system volume, and some fundamental universal constants. This expression lets us calculate explicit values for q, which can then be used to determine values for energy, entropy, heat capacity, and so on. These calculated values—determined from a statistical rather than a phenomenological perspective—can then be compared to experimental values. We will thus get the first chance to see how well a statistical approach to thermodynamics compares with experiment. 

Eq. (336) is not a universal constant, but a function of n, the form of which cannot be predicted by the preceding considerations. An analysis of the problem in terms of more fundamental (primary) quantities may be useful in this respect. 

Fundamental physical constants are universal and their values are needed for different problems of physics and metrology, far beyond the study of simple atoms. That makes the precision physics of simple atoms a subject of a general physical interest. The determination of constants is a necessary and important part of most of the so-called precision test of the QED and bound state QED and that makes the precision physics of simple atoms an important field of a general interest. 

The results of such a theory will be to relate the macroscopic kinetic quantities to whatever new quantities we shall use to define our molecular unit. At this point we are faced with a dilemma. A molecule is in principle completely defined by the mass and atomic number of its representative atoms. A basic theory should therefore reduce our kinetic quantities to these more fundamental quantities and some universal constants such as the velocity of light c, Planck s constant A, and so on. While such a program is in principle possible, it is by no means practicable. 

We live in a biofriendly world. Were it otherwise, we wouldn t be around. The question is, therefore, how biofriendly is it Physicists have addressed this question and have come to the conclusion that if any of the fundamental physical constants were a little smaller or a little larger than they are, the universe would be very different from what it is and unable to produce or harbor living organisms. Not everyone, however, subscribes to the concept of fine-tuning embodied in the so-called Anthropic Principle, some preferring instead the notion of a multiverse, in which our universe is only one in trillions of trillions, perhaps the only one that, by mere chance, happened to have the right combination of constants to enable it to serve as our birthplace and abode. 

In conclusion, it may be mentioned in addition that the Boltzmann constant h, which by definition is the quotient of the gas constant R by Avogadro s number, can be also measured directly by determining the spectral distribution of intensity in the radiation emitted by a black body. The function which expresses the intensity in terms of the frequency and the temperature involves only two universal constants, k and h, the first of w hich is Boltzmann s constant the second is called Planck s constant, and is the fundamental constant of the quantum theory (Chap. VII, 1, p. 185). 

So far, we have introduced three parameters, k,h, and a, in the statement of the three particular laws of heat transfer. Note the fundamental difference among these parameters k is a thermophysical property, ft is a definition depending on flow, and o is a universal constant. 

Einstein s relativity theory also predicts that mass and energy are interchange-ahle. His famous equation, E mc, is a relation between E, the rest energy of a particle, and m, the mass of the particle when at rest (called the rest mass). When the particle is in motion, both E and m increase, but they remain connected by this fundamental equation and the universal constant... 

Standard uncertainty. Some of the universal constants, such as the speed of light in vacuum, form the basis of the SI system of measurement, hence their estabhshed value is considered exact. There are other constants, such as the basis of the atomic mass unit, which are not fundamental in nature but play an important practical role. Therefore, their value has also been adopted as exact. 

Chemistry Index at Free University Berlin This is a collection of resources, many of them databases or files produced at FU Berlin. Included are files on Fundamental Physical Constants, Acronyms (with emphasis on chemistry and spectroscopy), and Amino Acids (arranged by name with the abbreviations and linear structural formulas). 

The second axiom, which is reminiscent of Mach s principle, also contains the seeds of Leibniz s Monads [reschQl]. All is process. That is to say, there is no thing in the universe. Things, objects, entities, are abstractions of what is relatively constant from a process of movement and transformation. They are like the shapes that children like to see in the clouds. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations (see section 12.7.1) remind us that what we empirically accept as fundamental particles - electrons, atoms, molecules, etc. - actually never exist in total isolation. Moreover, recalling von Neumann s uniqueness theorem for canonical commutation relations (which asserts that for locally compact phase spaces all Hilbert-space representations of the canonical commutation relations are physically equivalent), we note that for systems with non-locally-compact phase spaces, the uniqueness theorem fails, and therefore there must be infinitely many physically inequivalent and... 

The unit of time is the second in the fundamental list of constants but it is convenient to use years when referring to the age of the Universe, Solar System or the Earth. I have chosen to use the SI prefixes in front of the symbol yr so that 109 years is 1 Gyr the age of the Universe is 15 billion years or 15 Gyr, etc., and whenever this refers to a period of time in the past then 4.5 Gyr ago will be used explicitly. 

---