Full-matrix Newton-Raphson

The moments of inertia A, B, C may be calculated from the optimized structures and the vibrational energy levels v,-, and these are available from the second-derivative matrix if a full-matrix Newton-Raphson refinement is used124,511. However, the approximations involved in the calculation of the entropies, that so far have been used for the computation of the conformational equilibria of coordination compounds, have led to considerable uncertainties163,86-881. 

Consider an inclusion complex with known ATas, which is the reflection of the energy difference (AAG ) between complexed and isolated species. How can this AAG° be computed Most of the MM force fields compute accurate A//f based on bond and group increments previously parametrized (see Heats of Formation). More recently, the inclusion of optimization methods based on the full matrix Newton-Raphson method allows the computation of AG° and A5°. Inclusion complexes can be considered as translational isomers (or pseudo-conformers) of the supra-assembly formed by host and guest owing to the absence of new bonds between them. The A//° or AG° of binding can thus be considered as the difference between that for the complex and that for the sum of isolated host and guest. Again, care has to be taken with these results since solvent effects are usually not considered. 

The Newton-Raphson block diagonal method is a second order optimizer. It calculates both the first and second derivatives of potential energy with respect to Cartesian coordinates. These derivatives provide information about both the slope and curvature of the potential energy surface. Unlike a full Newton-Raph son method, the block diagonal algorithm calculates the second derivative matrix for one atom at a time, avoiding the second derivatives with respect to two atoms. 

A more robust method is tire Newton-Raphson procedure. In Eq. (2.26), we expressed the full force-field energy as a multidimensional Taylor expansion in arbitrary coordinates. If we rewrite this expression in matrix notation, and truncate at second order, we have... 

The Newton-Raphson approach is another minimization method.f It is assumed that the energy surface near the minimum can be described by a quadratic function. In the Newton-Raphson procedure the second derivative or F matrix needs to be inverted and is then usedto determine the new atomic coordinates. F matrix inversion makes the Newton-Raphson method computationally demanding. Simplifying approximations for the F matrix inversion have been helpful. In the MM2 program, a modified block diagonal Newton-Raphson procedure is incorporated, whereas a full Newton-Raphson method is available in MM3 and MM4. The use of the full Newton-Raphson method is necessary for the calculation of vibrational spectra. Many commercially available packages offer a variety of methods for geometry optimization. 

Usually, p is chosen to be a number between 4 and 10. In this way the system moves in the best direction in a restricted subspace. For this subspace the second-derivative matrix is constructed by finite differences from the stored displacement and first-derivative vectors and the new positions are determined as in the Newton-Raphson method. This method is quite efficient in terms of the required computer time, and the matrix inversion is a very small fraction of the entire calculation. The adopted basis Newton-Raphson method is a combination of the best aspects of the first derivative methods, in terms of speed and storage requirements, and the more costly full Newton-Raphson technique, in terms of introducing the most important second-de-... 

There are a number of variations on the Newton-Raphson method, many of which aim to eliminate the need to calculate the full matrix of second derivatives. In addition, a family of methods called the quasi-Newton methods require only first derivatives and gradually construct the inverse Hessian matrix as the calculation proceeds. One simple way in which it may be possible to speed up the Newton-Raphson method is to use the same Hessian matrix for several successive steps of the Newton-Raphson algorithm with only the gradients being recalculated at each iteration. 

If Equation 15-34 is to be written for each (i,j,k) node and solved at the new time step (n+1), we obtain a complicated system of algebraic equations that is costly to invert computationally. When it cannot be locally linearized, the full but sparse matrix is solved using even more expensive Newton-Raphson iterations. Thus, we employ approximate factorization techniques to resolve the system into three simpler, but sequential banded ones. In this approach. 

The simplest numerical method for a detailed geometrically and material nonlinear (GMN) analysis is the Newton-Raphson scheme (Crisfield 1979 Bathe 1995), which can be found in three forms (i) the full Newton-Raphson, which is the most accurate, but also the most time consuming, since the tangent stiffness of the structure has to be calculated and factorized within each iteration in the solution procedure (ii) the modified Newton-Raphson, which differs from the full Newton-Raphson in that the calculation and the factorization of the tangent stiffness matrix take place only in some iterations within each step, thus requiring in most cases a larger number of iterations per step but... 

---