Second order optimizer

Th c Newton-Raph son block dingotial method is a second order optim izer. It calculates both the first and second derivatives of potential energy with respect to Cartesian coordinates. I hese derivatives provide information ahont both the slope and curvature of lh e poten tial en ergy surface, Un like a full Newton -Raph son method, the block diagonal algorilh m calculates the second derivative matrix for one atom at a lime, avoiding the second derivatives with respect to two atoms. 

A more balanced description requires MCSCF based methods where the orbitals are optimized for each particular state, or optimized for a suitable average of the desired states (state averaged MCSCF). It should be noted that such excited state MCSCF solutions correspond to saddle points in the parameter space for the wave function, and second-order optimization techniques are therefore almost mandatory. In order to obtain accurate excitation energies it is normally necessarily to also include dynamical Correlation, for example by using the CASPT2 method. 

The Kuhn-Tucker necessary conditions are satisfied at any local minimum or maximum and at saddle points. If (x, A, u ) is a Kuhn-Tucker point for the problem (8.25)-(8.26), and the second-order sufficiency conditions are satisfied at that point, optimality is guaranteed. The second order optimality conditions involve the matrix of second partial derivatives with respect to x (the Hessian matrix of the... 

We consider in this Section particular aspects relating to the optimization of a CASVB wavefunction. As for most procedures involving the optimization of orbitals, special attention should be given to the choice of optimization strategy. The optimization problem is in this case non-linear, so that an exact second-order scheme is preferable in order to ensure reliable convergence. A particularly useful account of various second-order optimization schemes has been presented by Helgaker [46]. 

Derive the detailed expression for the orbital Hessian for the special case of a closed shell single determinant wave function. Compare with equation (4 53) to check the result. The equation can be used to construct a second order optimization scheme in Hartree-Fock theory. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a scheme compared to the conventional first order methods ... 

This chapter discusses the fundamentals of nonlinear optimization. Section 3.1 focuses on optimality conditions for unconstrained nonlinear optimization. Section 3.2 presents the first-order and second-order optimality conditions for constrained nonlinear optimization problems. 

In this section, we discuss the need for second-order optimality conditions, and present the second-order constraint qualification along with the second-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (3.3). 

Part 1, comprised of three chapters, focuses on the fundamentals of convex analysis and nonlinear optimization. Chapter 2 discusses the key elements of convex analysis (i.e., convex sets, convex and concave functions, and generalizations of convex and concave functions), which are very important in the study of nonlinear optimization problems. Chapter 3 presents the first and second order optimality conditions for unconstrained and constrained nonlinear optimization. Chapter 4 introduces the basics of duality theory (i.e., the primal problem, the perturbation function, and the dual problem) and presents the weak and strong duality theorem along with the duality gap. Part 1 outlines the basic notions of nonlinear optimization and prepares the reader for Part 2. 

Applications of continuum solvation approaches to MCSCF wavefunctions have required a more developed formulation with respect to the HF or DFT level. Even for an isolated molecule, the optimization of MCSFCF wavefunctions represents a difficult computational problem, owing to the marked nonlinearity of the MCSCF energy with respect to the orbital and configurational variational parameters. Only with the introduction of second-order optimization methods and of the variational parameters expressed in an exponential form, has the calculation of MCSCF wavefunction became routine. Thus, the requirements of the development of a second-order optimization method has been mandatory for any successful extension of the MCSCF approach to continuum solvation methods. In 1988 Mikkelsen el ol. [10] pioneered the second-order MCSCF within a multipole continuum model approach in a spherical cavity. Aguilar et al. [11] proposed the first implementation of the MCSCF method for the DPCM solvation model in 1991, and their PCM-MCSCF method has been the basis of many extensions to more robust second-order MCSCF optimization algorithms [12],... 

Our next step for achieving a second order optimization procedure of the energy functional is to obtain the Hessian contribution, denoted by af due to the interactions between the quantum and classical subsystems. This is effectively done by performing linear transformations using configuration state function trial vectors and orbital trial vectors. The trial vectors are denoted and we obtain the following expressions... 

The discussion above has centred around full second-order optimization methods where no further approximations have been made. Computationally such procedures involve two major steps which consume more than 90% of the computer time the transformation of two-electron integrals and the update of the Cl vector. The latter problem was discussed, to some extent, in the previous section. In order to make the former problem apparent, let us write down the explicit formula for one of the elements of the orbital-orbital parts of the Hessian matrix (31), corresponding to the interaction between two... 

The second-order, optimized mode expansion of Andersen and Chandler, which proves to be identical to this, has been evaluated for ionic solutions. The results confirm that (104) is a highly accurate approximation for the 1-1 electrol) es except at very low concentrations where our AB2 correlation is important. For dipolar spheres, (104) was evaluated by Verlet and Weis, who were led to its consideration along with the LIN result (99) on somewhat different grounds from ours. It is a reasonably good approximation, but not as good as the Fade result given by Eq. (38). However, if one adds the third-order... 

It is our experience that from (say) a molecular mechanics-derived starting geometry, a trust-region-based second-order optimization will converge in five to seven steps, and only in rare cases will it require as many as nine. From a more accurate starting geometry, such as one obtained from an ab initio calculation in a smaller basis, convergence is typically obtained in two or three steps. It is quite likely that for well-behaved systems, and/or... 

For an implementation of second-order optimization methods and for a characterization of the optimized state, we expand the MCSCF energy (12.2.8) to second order in the variational parameters. In terms of the parameters k, the second-order MCSCF energy Q(X) is given by... 

We conclude that, for closed-shell and high-spin states, second-order optimizations can be carried out in the AO basis at a cost of n for each trial-vector transformation (10.8.8). For other open-shell CSF states, it is more difficult to simplify the construction of the Q matrix in order to carry out a second-order optimization in the AO basis. However, with the possible exception of the two-electron open-shell singlet state (10.1.7), Hartree-Fock wave functions for oth than high-spin states are of little interest except for systems of high spatial symmetry. In Exercise 10.7, an STO-3G Hartree-Fock wave function for HeH is calculated using Newton s method. 

---