Free energy dielectric

Flere u. j(r,T,P) is the short-range potential for ions, and e is the dielectric constant of the solvent. The solvent averaged potentials are thus actually free energies that are fimctions of temperature and pressure. The... 

Within the framework of the same dielectric continuum model for the solvent, the Gibbs free energy of solvation of an ion of radius and charge may be estimated by calculating the electrostatic work done when hypothetically charging a sphere at constant radius from q = 0 q = This yields the Bom equation [13]... 

As with SCRF-PCM only macroscopic electrostatic contribntions to the Gibbs free energy of solvation are taken into account, short-range effects which are limited predominantly to the first solvation shell have to be considered by adding additional tenns. These correct for the neglect of effects caused by solnte-solvent electron correlation inclnding dispersion forces, hydrophobic interactions, dielectric saturation in the case of... 

Vorobjev, Y., Almagro, J. C., Hermans, J. Conformational free energy calculated by a new iiK thod from dynamics simulation and continuum dielectric... 

It is often the case that the solvent acts as a bulk medium, which affects the solute mainly by its dielectric properties. Therefore, as in the case of electrostatic shielding presented above, explicitly defined solvent molecules do not have to be present. In fact, the bulk can be considered as perturbing the molecule in the gas phase , leading to so-called continuum solvent models [14, 15]. To represent the electrostatic contribution to the free energy of solvation, the generalized Bom (GB) method is widely used. Wilhin the GB equation, AG equals the difference between and the vacuum Coulomb energy (Eq. (38)) ... 

The final class of methods that we shall consider for calculating the electrostatic compone of the solvation free energy are based upon the Poisson or the Poisson-Boltzmann equatior Ihese methods have been particularly useful for investigating the electrostatic properties biological macromolecules such as proteins and DNA. The solute is treated as a body of co stant low dielectric (usually between 2 and 4), and the solvent is modelled as a continuum high dielectric. The Poisson equation relates the variation in the potential (f> within a mediu of uniform dielectric constant e to the charge density p ... 

Solvents exert their influence on organic reactions through a complicated mixture of all possible types of noncovalent interactions. Chemists have tried to unravel this entanglement and, ideally, want to assess the relative importance of all interactions separately. In a typical approach, a property of a reaction (e.g. its rate or selectivity) is measured in a laige number of different solvents. All these solvents have unique characteristics, quantified by their physical properties (i.e. refractive index, dielectric constant) or empirical parameters (e.g. ET(30)-value, AN). Linear correlations between a reaction property and one or more of these solvent properties (Linear Free Energy Relationships - LFER) reveal which noncovalent interactions are of major importance. The major drawback of this approach lies in the fact that the solvent parameters are often not independent. Alternatively, theoretical models and computer simulations can provide valuable information. Both methods have been applied successfully in studies of the solvent effects on Diels-Alder reactions. 

The Born model is based on electrostatic interactions, dielectric permitivity, and orbital overlaps. It has the advantage of being fairly straightforward and adaptable to computational methods. The free energy for the polarization of the solute is expressed as... 

For reasons of space and because of their prime importance, we focus here on free energy calculations based on detailed molecular dynamics (MD) or Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. However, several other computational approaches exist to calculate free energies, including continuum dielectric models and integral equation methods [4,14]. 

Consider an alchemical transformation of a particle in water, where the particle s charge is changed from 0 to i) (e.g., neon sodium q = ). Let the transformation be performed first with the particle in a spherical water droplet of radius R (formed of explicit water molecules), and let the droplet then be transferred into bulk continuum water. From dielectric continuum theory, the transfer free energy is just the Born free energy to transfer a spherical ion of charge q and radius R into a continuum with the dielectric constant e of water ... 

Another variant that may mrn out to be the method of choice performs the alchemical free energy simulation with a spherical model surrounded by continuum solvent, neglecting portions of the macromolecule that lie outside the spherical region. The reaction field due to the outer continuum is easily included, because the model is spherical. Additional steps are used to change the dielectric constant of that portion of the macromolecule that lies in the outer region from its usual low value to the bulk solvent value (before the alchemical simulation) and back to its usual low value (after the alchemical simulation) the free energy for these steps can be obtained from continuum electrostatics [58]. 

Solvent effects on chemical equilibria and reactions have been an important issue in physical organic chemistry. Several empirical relationships have been proposed to characterize systematically the various types of properties in protic and aprotic solvents. One of the simplest models is the continuum reaction field characterized by the dielectric constant, e, of the solvent, which is still widely used. Taft and coworkers [30] presented more sophisticated solvent parameters that can take solute-solvent hydrogen bonding and polarity into account. Although this parameter has been successfully applied to rationalize experimentally observed solvent effects, it seems still far from satisfactory to interpret solvent effects on the basis of microscopic infomation of the solute-solvent interaction and solvation free energy. 

Figure 8-3. Plot of free energy of activation for the Menschutkin reaction EtjN + EtI Et4N + 1 against the Kirkwood dielectric constant function. Data are from Table 8-5, where the solvents are identified.

---