Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fractions from binary separation

For the case of separating a binary mixture, the following conventions are used. The concentrations of the streams are specified by the mol fraction of the desired component. The purpose of the separation process is usually to obtain one component of the mixture in an enriched form. If both components are desired, the choice of the desired component is an arbitrary one. The upflowing stream from the separation stage is the one in which the desired component is enriched, and by virtue of this convention, a is defined as a quantity the value of which is greater than unity. However, for the processes considered here, a exceeds unity by only a very small fraction, and the relationship between the concentrations leaving the stage can be written, without appreciable error, in the form... [Pg.76]

This example is taken from Mujtaba and Macchietto (1996). The problem is to design a column for 2 binary separation duties. One of the separations is very easy compared to the other one. The fraction of production time for each duty is specified together with the still capacity (B0) and the vapour load (V). Each binary mixture produces only one main distillate product and a bottom residue (states MPf= Dl, Bfl] and MP2=[D2, Bf2]) from feed states EFt= Fl and EF2= F2], respectively, with only one distillation task in each separation duty. Desired purities are specified for the two main-cuts (x Di and xID2). Also obtain the optimal operating policies in terms of reflux ratio for the separations. [Pg.213]

From Eqs. (7-1) and (7-2), it follows that the separation factor is purely based on the compositions of the entering and exit streams regardless of their flows. Another measure of the separation efficiency of a membrane process is the extent of separation proposed by Rony [1968]. In the context of applying this index of separation efficiency between two comfionents, it is assumed that there is no difficulty in separating the third component Thus the segregation fractions, fiy, are obtained from the molar flow rates of the permeate and retentate streams on the basis of only two components. The extent of separation is defined as the absolute value of a determinant of a binary separation matrix consisting of the segregation fractions as follows ... [Pg.254]

The SMB technology was developed by UOP and its major field of application is in the area of binary separations. For example, SMB has been used in the chemical industry for several separations known as SORBEX processes [1-3], which include, among others, the PAREX process for p-xylene separation from a Cs aromatic fraction [4], the OLEX process for the separation of olefins from paraffins, the SAREX process to separate fructose from glucose [4] and the MOLEX process [5]. Simulated moving bed is being used particularly for separation of enantiomers from racemic mixtures or from the products of enantioselective synthesis [6,7]. It has been used for the production of fine chemicals, and petrochemical intermediates, such as Cg-hydrocarbons [8], food chemistry such as fatty acids [2], or certain sugars from carbohydrate mixtures [8] and protein desalination [9]. [Pg.781]

An unusual binary separation takes place between DMF and cyclohexanone. They form an azeotrope and separation by fractionation would appear to be difficult. However DMF is fuUy water miscible and does not form a water azeotrope so it caimot be steam distilled. The steam/cyclohexanone azeotrope can be steam distilled batchwise from DMF which can be dried fairly easily. [Pg.395]

The sum of the mol fractions of toluene and m-xylene is 0.434. The sum of the mol fractions of benzene, n-heptane, o-xylene, and indene is 0.457. In this case, the physical properties of the phases may not be representative of a binary separation of the light key and heavy key that provided the basis for determining the number of theoretical stages required. Thus, the design HETP value obtained from physical properties of the system should be applied only to the number of theoretical stages determined by a rigorous method for multicomponent mixtures. [Pg.204]

Kassalainen and Williams [135] coupled thermal field flow fractionation (ThFFF) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-ToF-MS) to yield a powerful combination of techniques for the analysis of polydisperse PS. ThFFF high selectivity and sensitivity to chemical composition were used to separate polydisperse polymers and polymer mixtures into the narrow polydispersity and homogeneous chemical composition fractions essential for MAT.DT-ToF-MS analyses. On the other hand, because it is possible to measure directly using MALDI-ToF-MS, it alleviates the need for polymer standards for ThFFF. Kassalainen and Williams [135] address the coupling of ThFFF and MALDI-ToF-MS and identify compatibility issues. Optimum conditions were determined and developed to maximise the capabilities of the combined technique. Depending on the polymer and the method of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) sample deposition, fractions from 1-10 ThFFF runs were combined for MALDI-ToF-MS analysis. Binary solvents are used to enhance ThFFF retention and resolution of low (<15 kDa) polymers, and methods developed to allow routine MALDI-ToF-MS analyses of PS polymers up to 575 kDa. Overall, the compatibility of the two techniques was extended from several kilodaltons to several hundred kDa. Polymer... [Pg.16]

On account of very low ceramic yields from these chlorides and low molecular compounds, it is difficult to obtain a matrix with high ZrC/ZrB volume fraction. A binary matrix of ZrC(or ZrB ) with SiC can only be proceeded separately leading to alternating formation of ZrC(or ZrB ) and SiC, therefore these two phases exhibit a sandwiched microstructure, which differs from the homogeneous dispersed UHTCs composite prepared by hot-pressing. [Pg.418]

Prus and Kowalska [75] dealt with the optimization of separation quality in adsorption TLC with binary mobile phases of alcohol and hydrocarbons. They used the window diagrams to show the relationships between separation selectivity a and the mobile phase eomposition (volume fraction Xj of 2-propanol) that were caleulated on the basis of equations derived using Soezewiriski and Kowalska approaehes for three solute pairs. At the same time, they eompared the efficiency of the three different approaehes for the optimization of separation selectivity in reversed-phase TLC systems, using RP-2 stationary phase and methanol and water as the binary mobile phase. The window diagrams were performed presenting plots of a vs. volume fraetion Xj derived from the retention models of Snyder, Schoen-makers, and Kowalska [76]. [Pg.93]

Steam distillation is for the separation of mixtures of tars and oils, and they must not dissolve much in water. If you think about it a bit, this could be considered a fractional distillation of a binary mixture with an extreme deviation from Raoult s Law. The water and the organic oils want nothing to do with each other. So much so, that you can consider them unmixed, in separate compartments of the distilling flask. As such, they act completely indepen-... [Pg.307]

As a second example, consider the partitioning of Cd(II) between two adsorbents—a-TiC and (am)Fe20j.H20. Figure 11 shows Cd(II) fractional adsorption as a function of pH for binary mixtures of these adsorbents under experimental conditions such that Cddl) and SOUp are constant only the surface site mole fraction varies from one end-member to the next. As the site mole fraction shifts between the end-members, the fractional adsorption edges for the binary adsorbent mixtures varies between the limits defined by end-members. In the absence of particle-particle interactions, the adsorbents should act as independent ligands competing for complexa-tion of Cd(II). If this is the case, then the distribution of Cd(II) in such binary mixtures can be described by a composite mass-action expression (13) which includes a separate term for the interaction of Cd(II) with each adsorbent. [Pg.179]


See other pages where Fractions from binary separation is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.912]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.1238]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.1172]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.751]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.141]   


SEARCH



Binary separation

Fractionation separation

Fractions from

Mass fractions from binary separation

Separation fractions

© 2024 chempedia.info