Fossil fired electric power

Fossil fuel electrical power plants can be more hazardous to humans than nuclear power plants because of the pollutants. A 1,000 megawatt (MW) coal-fired power plant releases about 100 times as much radioactivity into the environment as a comparable nuclear plant. A 1,000-MW power plant will use 2,000 railroad cars of coal or 10 supertankers of oil but only 12 cubic meters of natural uranium every year. Fossil fuel... 

The principal pollutants of concern to fossil fuel-fired electric power plants are sulfur oxides, particulates, and nitrogen oxides. The national ambient air quality standards for these three pollutants are shown in Table I. 

Data for the reference system—coal-fired electricity—are adapted from Loi et al. s study [46], the Ecoinvent database for rest of world (RoW) [47], technical reports of PECCI [42], and GIZ-GDE/MOIT s report [48], in combination with calculation results following the guidelines of the AustraHan National Greenhouse Accounts and the National Pollutant Inventory Emission estimation technique manual for Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation [49,50]. Fig. 14.3 illustrates different processes of generating coal-fired electricity. 

Power plants based on the Rankine thermodynamic cycle have served the majority of the world s electric power generation needs in the twentieth century. The most common heat sources employed by Rankine cycle power plants are either fossil fuel-fired or nuclear steam generators. The former are the most widely used. 

Electric power generation using biomass as a fuel is economic in situations where the cost of the fuel is competitive with that of fossil fuels. The cost of a commercially available biomass steam—electric power plant is about 1500/kW for a wood-fired facility. If wood can be obtained at a cost of 2.00/GJ ( 2.10 X 10 /Btu), the total cost of power for base-load operation would be about 0.05/kWh. If wood or agricultural wastes are available at... 

Last year China added 96 gW of new coal-burning power plants—without any C02 cleanup—to its electricity-generating capacity. Today, China is building almost two fossil-fired power plants a week. In 2006, she added 114 gW to her fossil-generating capacity. Last year she burned 2.7 billion tons of coal. This is 75% of the quantity that was projected for 2020. Since 1990, American emissions rose by 18%, whereas Chinese emissions increased by 77%. Because the Chinese economy is three times as "carbon intensive" as the American, dollar for dollar more reduction could be achieved if investments were made to reduce Chinese, instead of American, power plant emissions. 

The Federal Power Commission, with the cooperation of the EPA, collects air and water quality control data for each fossil fuel-fired electric generating plant of 25 MW and greater. Under this program the FPC collected information for the year 1969 ( 2) from 655 fossil-fueled plants with 2995 boiler-generator units having a total capacity of 244 thousand MW, compared with the 3298 units with a total capacity of 259 thousand MW reported in Table III for the year 1970. 

Mercury is considered for possible regulation in the electric power industry under Title III of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. One promising approach for removing mercury from fossil-fired flue gas involves the direct injection of activated carbon into the gas. Meserole et al. (1999) describe a theoretical model for estimating mercury removal by the sorbent injection process. An important parameter of the model is the effective diffu-sivity of mercuric chloride vapor traces in the flue gas. If the flue gas is at 1.013 bar and 408 K, and its composition (on a mercuric chloride-free basis) is 6% 02, 12% C02, 7% H20, and 75% N2, estimate the effective diffusivity of mercuric chloride in the flue gas. Assume that only the HgCl2 is adsorbed by the activated carbon. Meserole et al. reported an effective diffusivity value of 0.22 cm2/s. 

The electric power industry uses three types of fossil fuel power plants coal-fired steam, gas turbine, and combined cycle power plants. The most common and widely used is the pulverized coal-fired steam power plant. Fuel oil can be used in place of... 

There are two possible ways for the proper preservation by drying by using fossil fuels and by using solar energy. Not considering the disadvantageous environmental pollution effects caused by the CO2, SO2, and NO emission, the use of fossil fuel fired or electrically powered dryers is limited and inappropriate for most of the farmers in developing countries. The main reasons are as follows ... 

---