Forward limiting cases

Approaches to the determination of the concentration-dependent terms in expressions for reversible reactions are often based on a simplification of the expression to limiting cases. By starting with a mixture containing reactants alone and terminating the study while the reaction system is still very far from equilibrium, one may use an initial rate study to determine the concentration dependence of the forward reaction. In similar fashion one may start with mixtures containing only the reaction products and use the initial rates of the reverse reaction to determine the concentration dependence of this part of the rate expression. Additional simplifications in these initial rate studies may arise from the use of stoichiometric ratios of reactants and/or products. At other times the use of a vast... 

Standard potential of the second electron transfer more cathodic than that of the first electron transfer (AE0 negative). One can consider the case where the formal electrode potential of the second couple is more cathodic, by at least 180 mV, with respect to the first couple (which has, for example, E01 = 0.00 V). If kf is low (compared to the intervention times of cyclic voltammetry i.e. if k[< n F- v/R T), the response will be due to the first electron transfer process, without complications caused by the following chemical reaction. As increases, the second process will have increasing effect up to the limiting case in which kt >n-F-v/R-T. In this limiting case the voltammogram will display two forward peaks, but only the second electron transfer will exhibit a return peak. 

Despite the many-body character of the exact fast-forward driving potential, it is worthwhile considering a simple limiting case for which the driving potential becomes a one-body potential. We assume that the ground state is well approximated by the mean field wave function... 

The relative importance of a and r contributions to the overall bonding is unclear, but several different combinations of relative strengths lead to limiting case models. When there are 2 electrons in the forward (T-bond and 2 electrons in the ir-backbond, there are 2 bonding electrons for each metal-carbon bond. This is mathematically equivalent to 2tr-bonds and a metallocyclopropane structure (72). This model does not necessitate strict sp3 hybridization at the carbon atoms. Molecular orbital calculations for cyclopropane (15) indicate that the C—C bonds have higher carbon atom p character than do the C—H bonds. Thus, the metallocyclopropane model allows it interactions with substituent groups on the olefin (68). 

It is informative to examine the limiting cases of the above expressions for the current over a specific local barrier. The thermal equilibrium limit is reached whenever the current J is chosen to be zero. We note that this requires forward and reverse components of the hopping current to be equal in magnitude. From eqn. (74), we obtain... 

Approximate solutions for the two limiting cases discussed above can be obtained (see below). However, most real flows are not well described by either of these two limiting solutions. For this reason, a numerical solution of the governing equations must usually be obtained. To illustrate how such solutions can be obtained, a simple forward-marching, explicit finite-difference solution will be discussed here. 

Wilson and Herschbach [75] have discovered several systems, involving polyhalide molecules, where the peak intensity of the scattered product corresponded to wide c.m. angles and the dynamics is intermediate between the limiting cases represented by rebound and stripping. The preference for forward scattering could be correlated with large values for aR. E was estimated to lie between 10 and 30% of the total energy. 

In the converse situation, three limiting cases may be observed. In the first case the electron transfer is intrinsically slow. The RDS of the overall process is then the forward electron transfer, and the redox system is said to be slow and chemically irreversible. The electrochemical wave is then observed at potentials sufficiently different from E° for n(E — E°) 0 (Sec. III.C.3). The two other situations are encountered when is large... 

The formula (3) is valid only in the limiting case of small v (long waves). W. Wien put forward a formula which represents correctly the observed decrease in intensity for high frequencies. A forritula which includes both of these others as limiting cases was found by Planck, first by an ingenious interpolation, and shortly afterwards derived theoretically. It is... 

At this point it is useful to consider two limiting cases. First are the particles whose dimensions are small with respect to the wavelength of the light, that is, A. In this case, the scattering in the forward direction is equal to the scattering in the backward direction, and it can be shown that °2... 

Subscripts are used to provide additional information. The subscript for reversible (meaning that both forward and reverse processes are fast enough to maintain equilibrium or Nemstian conditions at the surface), and i represents irreversible (only the forward reaction is significant) i and r are limiting cases of q, or quasi-reversible (meaning that both the forward and reverse processes take place but are not fast enough to be considered at equilibrium). Thus, in an E Cj mechanism the electrode reaction is fast and reversible and the chemical reaction is irreversible. 

The cyclic voltammetric response for this system (with the electrode reaction reversible, a CE, mechanism) is determined by X, and (k +k 2)/v. The limiting cases of the CE mechanism are (1) the chemical step is fast and at equilibrium, and (2) the forward chemical reaction is slow with respect to the time scale of the experiment. In case 1, the CV has an p determined by the E9 and Xgq. In case 2, the cyclic voltammogram will be reversible and will reflect only ° and the initial concentration of species Ox. 

Forwarding by a screw (except in gravity conveyors) is bounded by two limiting cases. These are demonstrated in Figure 6.1. The bolt represents the extruder screw and the nut the bed of plastics granules in the screw channel. 

An important special limiting case of Eq. (2.109) is adsorption in the absence of any reaction, obtained when the forward rate of reaction (2.103) is zero... 

If a sequence of reaction steps consists only of irreversible steps, then all forward rates must be equal. When this occurs, the intermediates or active centers concentrations will adjust themselves to achieve this. The reaction that consumes the active center or intermediate of the highest concentration is the rate limiting step. Even in this case all rates must be equal. One should be cautious when speaking about the slowest rate perhaps the smallest rate constant would be somewhat better. 

---