Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Forward density

This relation is a direct consequence of the conservation of flux. The target casts a shadow in the forward direction where the intensity of the incident beam becomes reduced by just that amount which appears in the scattered wave. This decrease in intensity or shadow results from interference between the incident wave and the scattered wave in the forward direction. Figure B2.2.2 for the density P (r) of section B2.2.6 illustrates... [Pg.2034]

If the region FGH of the isotherm represents the filling of all the pores with liquid adsorbate, then the amount adsorbed along to plateau FGH, when expressed as a volume of liquid (by use of the normal liquid density) should be the same for all adsorptives on a given porous solid. This prediction is embodied in a generalization put forward many years ago by Gurvitsch and usually known as the Gurvitsch rule. [Pg.113]

This reaction has a positive free energy of 422.2 kj (100.9 kcal) at 25°C and hence energy has to be suppHed in the form of d-c electricity to drive the reaction in a net forward direction. The amount of electrical energy required for the reaction depends on electrolytic cell parameters such as current density, voltage, anode and cathode material, and the cell design. [Pg.482]

An analogy to sHp dislocation is the movement of a caterpillar where a hump started at one end moves toward the other end until the entire caterpillar moves forward. Another analogy is the displacement of a mg by forming a hump at one end and moving it toward the other end. Strain hardening occurs because the dislocation density increases from about 10 dislocations/cm to as high as 10 /cm. This makes dislocation motion more difficult because dislocations interact with each other and become entangled. SHp tends to occur on more closely packed planes in close-packed directions. [Pg.231]

HBT Device Characteristics. The HBT consists of two back-to-back n—p diodes. In the most typical configuration the emitter—base diode is forward biased, with the coUector-base diode reverse biased. Because the current ia a forward-biased n—p diode is exponentiaUy dependent on the bias, smaU changes ia the emitter-base voltage result ia large changes ia the emitter current. The current across the emitter-base junction is a combination of the electrons iajected iato the base and the holes iajected iato the emitter. If the diode was semi-infinite to each side, the electron current density,/, could be expressed as foUows (44), where q is the electron charge, Vis the bias across the diode, kT... [Pg.374]

Calculate liquid densities, molar tray and condenser-reflux drum holdups, ana hquor and vapor enthalpies. Determine holdup and enthalpy derivatives with respect to time by forward difference approximations. [Pg.1340]

Mucus gel is propelled toward the epiglottis by a two-phase ciliary beat cycle. Forward mucus movement occurs during the effective or power phase of the cycle, when cilia fully extend and traverse an arc perpendicular to the epithelial surface (Fig. 5.24). Claw-like structures, 25-35 nm long, project from each cilia tip and appear to assist in the mechanical transfer of momentum from cilia to mucus gel. Maximum mucus velocity depends on the extent cilia penetrate the epiphase during the power phase, periciliary and mucus gel viscosity, and cilia density. [Pg.215]

The conseqnence is that the rate of prodnction of volnme of hnrned prodncts is greater dne to the density decrease resnlting from the reaction. As the prodncts expand this canses the nnhnrned mixtnre to move as well. The flame is then seen to move forward with a higher apparent velocity, Vf, the snm of the mean nnhnrned gas velocity, u, and the tnrhnlent hnrning velocity, S. Vf is called the flame velocity (flame speed). [Pg.62]

Implementation of the Kohn-Sham-LCAO procedure is quite simple we replace the standard exchange term in the HF-LCAO expression by an appropriate Vxc that will depend on the local electron density and perhaps also its gradient. The new integrals involved contain fractional powers of the electron density and cannot be evaluated analytically. There are various ways forward, all of which... [Pg.226]

Each of these two procedures can be varied by proceeding from a low to a high current density (or potential) or from a high to a low current density (or potential) the former is referred to as forward polarisation and the latter as reverse polarisation. Furthermore, there are a number of variations of the potentiostatic technique, and in the potentiokinetic method the pwtential of the electrode is made to vary continuously at a predetermined rate, the current being monitored on a recorder in the pulse method the electrode is given a pulse of potential and the current transient is determined by means of an oscilloscope. [Pg.107]

The net current density, /, in the forward direction (i.e. that producing film growth) is... [Pg.130]

This is the general expression for film growth under an electric field. The same basic relationship can be derived if the forward and reverse rate constants, k, are regarded as different, and the forward and reverse activation energies, AG are correspondingly different these parameters are equilibrium parameters, and are both incorporated into the constant A. The parameters A and B are constants for a particular oxide A has units of current density (Am" ) and B has units of reciprocal electric field (mV ). Equation 1.114 has two limiting approximations. [Pg.130]

Solution Example 4.5 was a reverse problem, where measured reactor performance was used to determine constants in the rate equation. We now treat the forward problem, where the kinetics are known and the reactor performance is desired. Obviously, the results of Run 1 should be closely duplicated. The solution uses the method of false transients for a variable-density system. The ideal gas law is used as the equation of state. The ODEs are... [Pg.130]

The probability density can be calculated by way of Eq. (1.7). Both a forward and an inverse function for the cumulative probability CP are needed ... [Pg.330]

Fig. 4 shows the current density over the supported catalysts measured in 1 M methanol containing 0.5 M sulfuric acid. During forward sweep, the methanol electro-oxidation started to occur at 0.35 V for all catalysts, which is typical feature for monometallic Pt catalyst in methanol electro-oxidation [8]. The maximum current density was decreased in the order of Pt/CMK-1 > Pt/CMK-3 > Pt/Vulcan. It should be noted that the trend of maximum current density was identical to that of metal dispersion (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Therefore, it is concluded that the metal dispersion is a critical factor determining the catalytic performance in the methanol electro-oxidation. Fig. 4 shows the current density over the supported catalysts measured in 1 M methanol containing 0.5 M sulfuric acid. During forward sweep, the methanol electro-oxidation started to occur at 0.35 V for all catalysts, which is typical feature for monometallic Pt catalyst in methanol electro-oxidation [8]. The maximum current density was decreased in the order of Pt/CMK-1 > Pt/CMK-3 > Pt/Vulcan. It should be noted that the trend of maximum current density was identical to that of metal dispersion (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Therefore, it is concluded that the metal dispersion is a critical factor determining the catalytic performance in the methanol electro-oxidation.
Figure 2. Probability density plots of the ethyl cation product, (a) from the unlabeled reaction, (b) CH2CH3 from the labeled reaction, and (c) CD3CH2 from the labeled reaction. The backward scattered ethyl cation is more probable in (b), while the forward scattered ethyl cation is more probable in (c). Reprinted from [39] with permission from Elsevier. Figure 2. Probability density plots of the ethyl cation product, (a) from the unlabeled reaction, (b) CH2CH3 from the labeled reaction, and (c) CD3CH2 from the labeled reaction. The backward scattered ethyl cation is more probable in (b), while the forward scattered ethyl cation is more probable in (c). Reprinted from [39] with permission from Elsevier.

See other pages where Forward density is mentioned: [Pg.564]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.1926]    [Pg.1935]    [Pg.2894]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.1183]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.271]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.396 ]




SEARCH



Forward

Forwarder

© 2024 chempedia.info