Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Forming , solid-phase parameters

The only compounds in Table 3.2 that do not form solid phases within our model are Mg(NOs)2 and Ca(NOs)2. On Earth, common nitrate salts such an NaNC>3 and KNO3 typically form in arid, alkaline environments. Under these environmental conditions, Mg and Ca concentrations are low because of the insolubility of their respective carbonate minerals. Mg(N03)2 and Ca(N03)2 Pitzer-equation parameters were added to the model to account for trace concentrations of Mg and Ca in such nitrate environments. It would be a serious misuse of the model to calculate solution properties in systems where Mg(NC>3)2 and Ca(N03)2 are present at high concentrations. [Pg.33]

After the purification by these methods, incombustible impurities and oxidized forms of carbon in the synthesized powders were assayed. For some samples, the pycnometric density was determined. The efficiency of the methods used to produce pure powders of ultradisperse diamonds was assessed based on these solid-phase parameters (Table 2.1). [Pg.33]

A simple, rapid and seleetive eleetroehemieal method is proposed as a novel and powerful analytieal teehnique for the solid phase determination of less than 4% antimony in lead-antimony alloys without any separation and ehemieal pretreatment. The proposed method is based on the surfaee antimony oxidation of Pb/Sb alloy to Sb(III) at the thin oxide layer of PbSOyPbO that is formed by oxidation of Pb and using linear sweep voltammetrie (LSV) teehnique. Determination was earried out in eoneentrate H SO solution. The influenee of reagent eoneentration and variable parameters was studied. The method has deteetion limit of 0.056% and maximum relative standard deviation of 4.26%. This method was applied for the determination of Sb in lead/aeid battery grids satisfaetory. [Pg.230]

Doyen [158] was one who theoretically examined the reflection of metastable atoms from a solid surface within the framework of a quantum- mechanical model based on the general properties of the solid body symmetry. From the author s viewpoint the probability of metastable atom reflection should be negligibly small, regardless of the chemical nature of the surface involved. However, presence of defects and inhomogeneities of a surface formed by adsorbed layers should lead to an abrupt increase in the reflection coefficient, so that its value can approach the relevant gaseous phase parameter on a very inhomogeneous surface. [Pg.326]

Bunimovich et al. (1995) lumped the melt and solid phases of the catalyst but still distinguished between this lumped solid phase and the gas. Accumulation of mass and heat in the gas were neglected as were dispersion and conduction in the catalyst bed. This results in the model given in Table V with the radial heat transfer, conduction, and gas phase heat accumulation terms removed. The boundary conditions are different and become identical to those given in Table IX, expanded to provide for inversion of the melt concentrations when the flow direction switches. A dimensionless form of the model is given in Table XI. Parameters used in the model will be found in Bunimovich s paper. [Pg.244]

Although, the true density of solid phase p=m/Vp (e.g., g/cm3) is defined by an atomic-molecular structure (/ ), it has become fundamental to the definition of many texture parameters. In the case of porous solids, the volume of solid phase Vp is equal to the volume of all nonporous components (particles, fibers, etc.) of a PS. That is, Vp excludes all pores that may be present in the particles and the interparticular space. The PS shown in Figure 9.17a is formed from nonporous particles that form porous aggregates, which, in turn, form a macroscopic granule of a catalyst. In this case, the volume Vp is equal to the total volume of all nonporous primary particles, and the free volume between and inside the aggregates (secondary particles) is not included. [Pg.283]

From a manufacturing standpoint, preparation of the double-antibody immune complex can be very labor intensive. For optimal manufacturability and analytical performance of this system, it is important to have a secondary antibody with a moderate to high affinity so that a mixture of immune complexes of appropriate molecular weights is formed. The molecular size and shape of complexes formed depends on a number of parameters, such as temperature, buffer characteristics, ionic strength and the presence of other solution components such as detergents. These conditions must be carefully controlled or else species of very high molecular weight could be formed due to temperature or buffer interactions. Lot-to-lot variability in the primary and secondary antibody raw materials can also affect the solid phase performance if not properly controlled. [Pg.465]

Figure 2. Distribution of the ionic components AX and BX over the solid components AX and BX over the solid phase and the aqueous phase for different values of the distribution parameter D under the assumption that AX and BX form ideal solid solutions and that the solid phase is homogeneous. Figure 2. Distribution of the ionic components AX and BX over the solid components AX and BX over the solid phase and the aqueous phase for different values of the distribution parameter D under the assumption that AX and BX form ideal solid solutions and that the solid phase is homogeneous.
However, other parameters, such as the salt concentration, ionic strength, and especially the natures of anions in the reacting solution, play essential roles in determining the properties of the precipitated solids. The effects of anions are related to their tendency to be incorporated in the solute complexes formed on aging, which in turn differ with each cation. These anion-containing solutes often act as precursors to the solid-phase formation, affecting the properties of the final products. Various phenomena are illustrated and discussed in the text that follows. [Pg.4]

A parameter indicating the flux of Fe2+ and H2S would be the measured ion activity product, IAP (52). A low pIAP value, corresponding to amorphous FeS, does not necessarily mean that other, more stable, solid FeS phases do not exist (the system would be supersaturated with respect to these phases), but it may indicate that the formation rate of both Fe2+ and H2S is high. At low net fluxes, other solid phases have time to form. Consequently, inverse gradients can be observed in systems where the net fluxes of Fe2+ and H2S are high (pIAP increases with depth) and in systems where the net fluxes of Fe2+ and H2S are low at the sediment-water interface (pIAP decreases with depth) (cf. ref. 52). [Pg.382]

Figure 9.13a shows the electron diffraction pattern of the Fe thin film before the reaction, and Figure 9.13b shows the thin film after the reaction with NO at 527 K [119]. The determination the cell parameters of the solid phases present in the films with the help of the electron diffraction patterns allows to identify the iron oxide formed during the reaction, that is, Fe203 [119]. [Pg.447]

Specifically, he developed relationships for the free energy of mixing of solvent and solute (polymer) molecules with different solute axial ratios (length/width) and solute interaction parameters. In the absence of interactions between solute molecules, the free energy of the system lowers when rodlike molecules precipitate out of solution and form a separate solid phase. This is due to the fact that small water molecules must order themselves around large rodlike macromolecules in solution and therefore the system is most stable when the water molecules and rodlike molecules are separated in space into different phases, such as liquid and solid phases. [Pg.142]

Figure 6. A schematic representation of a modulated excitation wave form (solid line) and the time delayed modulated emission waveform (dashed line). The parameters Atp and AA represent the change in phase and the change in modulation amplitude of the two wave forms. Figure 6. A schematic representation of a modulated excitation wave form (solid line) and the time delayed modulated emission waveform (dashed line). The parameters Atp and AA represent the change in phase and the change in modulation amplitude of the two wave forms.
All PALS and DB (AC) parameters can be sensitive to phase transitions and PAT have been commonly used for such studies [125, 126], A typical example is shown in Figure 4.13, for I3 in the case of sulfolan similar changes are observed for x3 and fwhm [23], With a roundish molecular shape, this compound forms a plastic phase below the melting temperature and before forming a brittle solid phase. In the plastic phase, the molecules can still rotate around their axis, but not move in a translational mode. [Pg.108]

The exponent values in expressions (5.2)—(5.5) depend on the particular parameters in the exponent index, but they are usually much larger than the unit at r < 10-50 nm (see Table 5.1). In a homogeneous mother sys tern (free of seeds for the solid phase condensation), the process rate depends on the rate of homogeneous nucleation of the new phase from nonequilibrium (oversaturated) systems. The high partial pressure of the equilibrium vapor or solute over small particles allows the first condensed particles nuclei of the new phase) to form at a considerable oversaturation of the vapor in the initially homogeneous system. [Pg.282]


See other pages where Forming , solid-phase parameters is mentioned: [Pg.72]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.139]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.7 , Pg.8 , Pg.9 , Pg.10 , Pg.11 , Pg.12 , Pg.13 , Pg.14 , Pg.15 , Pg.16 , Pg.17 , Pg.18 , Pg.19 , Pg.20 , Pg.21 , Pg.22 ]




SEARCH



Forming solid phase

Phase parameter

Solid forms

© 2024 chempedia.info