Formation constant estimates, differences

The selectivity here is directly proportional to complex formation constants and can be estimated, once the latter are known. Several methods are now available for determination of the complex formation constants and stoichiometry factors in solvent polymeric membranes, and probably the most elegant one is the so-called sandwich membrane method [31], Two membrane segments of different known compositions are placed into contact, which leads to a concentration polarized sensing membrane, which is measured by means of potentiometry. The power of this method is not limited to complex formation studies, but also allows one to quantify ion pairing, diffusion, and coextraction processes as well as estimation of ionic membrane impurity concentrations. 

The separation of the two stages is easier to discern when the rates of the two processes are so different, but it can also be seen in the ultrasonic spectra of metal-sulfate systems (Sec. 3.4.4). Ultrasonic absorption peaks can be attributed to formation of outer-sphere complexes (at higher frequency, shorter t) and collapse of outer-sphere to inner-sphere complexes (at lower frequency). In addition to uv spectral and ultrasonic detection, polarimetry and nmr methods have also been used to monitor and measure the strength of the interaction. There are difficulties in assessing the value of ATq, the outer-sphere formation constant. The assemblage that registers as an ion pair by conductivity measurements may show a blank spectroscopically. The value of Aq at T" K may be estimated using theoretically deduced expres-... 

Theoretical studies of the redox system formed by TTF and its radical-cation, using repulsion integrals calculated by two different methods, showed the possibilities and limitations of the Coulomb repulsion integrals to estimate formation constants of radicals. 

The D parameters are necessary to account for steric effects. The last term in Equation (1.19) can be neglected for large cations, but is important for small cations. It emphasizes another important difference between reactions in solution and in the gas phase. In solution the Lewis acid is multicoordinate, and has a number of water molecules attached to it. The steric effects arise from clashes of the ligand with these water molecules. A large number of E, C and D parameters are now available, and can be used to estimate formation constants for complexes between metal ions and the common ligands. 

Modeling divalent metal ion sorption requires estimation of the proton stoichiometry (the number of protons released per metal ion sorbed), the type of surface complex (inner or outer sphere) formed, and the formation constants for each reaction selected. Table 7-2 presents a list of various reactions that may be incorporated into the TLM. Because a variety of combinations of different sorption reactions and constants may fit various aspects of the sorption data equally well (see, e.g., Westall Hohl, 1980 Hayes et al., 1991 Katz Hayes, 1995a), protocols are needed to insure the best choice of reactions and a more universally accepted set of guidelines to allow reproducibility from one laboratory to another. The strategy used in modeling Co(II) sorption to a-Al203 involved ... 

The ion equilibria H] -l-H2 H +2 for n = 3, 5, 7, and 9 have been determined in a pulsed-electron-beam high-ion-source mass spectrometer. Hiraoka and Kebarle have measured the equilibrium constants at different temperatures and have hence estimated thermodynamic data for the formation of these cluster ions. 

Thus, we have to conclude that the solubility data in carbonate-bearing solutions of [2001POU/CUR] and [72DER] are not mutually consistent. Because the estimated logid PI = 42 constant of [2001POU/CUR] relies on data gathered at only two different carbonate concentrations, these data are judged insufficient to extract Zr carbonate formation constants and were therefore not considered for the derivation of log,o Pa ... 

In this table, all units are based on the molar scale and was obtained from the temperature dependence of the overall formation constant Based on the differences in these quantities with the two supporting electrolytes, the ion-association constant for LiCl was estimated as 10 -, which is in good agreement with the value 10 obtained from conductivity data. In PC-H2O mixtures up to [H2O] = 3.57 molar, the various equilibrium constants are given by... 

When using product distributions to estimate differences in activation free energies, we must be certain that the competing reactions really are irreversible. That is, we must ensure that the product distribution actually represents the relative magnitude of the rate constants for product formation. 

The mixed-valence complex [(bipy)2ClRu(III)Ph2PCH2PPh2Ru(n)Cl(bipy)2] is formed in mixtures of the corresponding [Ru(III),(III)] and [Ru(II),(II)] species and the rate of intramolecular electron transfer, 8.8 x 10 s has been calculated from an IT band at 1245 nm in acetonitrile solution. Comparison with the [Ru(bipy)2pyCl] self-exchange rate in acetonitrile is made possible by use of an estimated precursor complex formation constant of 0.6 mol liter" from which the outer-sphere intramolecular rate constant of 8 x 10 s" was evaluated. There is reasonable agreement especially when differences in the distance between redox sites (6.8 and 13.2 A) are taken into account. 

---