For solubility tests

Well, that just about concludes our brief look at solvents. If you can t dissolve it in one of the common solvents, you ve got problems. If in doubt, try a bit first, before committing your entire sample. Use nondeuterated solvents for solubility testing if possible, as they are much cheaper. 

You are to purify 2.0 g of an unknown provided by the instructor. Conduct tests for solubility and ability to crystallize in several organic solvents, solvent pairs, and water. Conserve your unknown by using very small quantities for solubility tests. If only a drop or two of solvent is used the solvent can be evaporated by heating the test tube on the steam bath or sand bath and the residue can be used for another test. Submit as much pure product as possible with evidence of its purity (i.e., the melting point). From the posted list identify the unknown. 

The object of the present experiment is to identify an unknown amine or amine salt. Procedures for solubility tests are given in Section 1. 

Goodwin JJ. Flow Cell System for Solubility Testing, in p 12 pp, (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA). Application EP, 2003. 

Figure 12 Filter plate method for solubility testing. (1) Add compound dissolved in organic solvent to aqueous buffer. (2) Shake for 90 minutes to allow insoluble compound to precipitate. (3) Apply vacuum to filter solution into collection plate. Precipitates remain on membrane. Analyze filtrate in collection plate to quantify the amount of the compound still in the solution. Source Courtesy of Millipore Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Figure 4.12 Filter plate method for solubility testing.

The extraction tests were exploratory and arbitrary in nature for two reasons relatively little plant material was supplied, with the result that no optimization studies could be carried out and pure material was unavailable for solubility testing. Not only were optimization studies impossible but also the extraction conditions were selected from experience with other complex organic compounds. 

This was thought to result from interaction between hydrated manganese dioxide formed when the anionic vacancies were oxidised and either the centres at which dissolution occurs or the silicic acid formed. Using HjOj as oxidant considerably enhanced 48 h solubility values. When the volume of air in the tubes used for solubility tests was varied from 0 to 50 times the volume of extractant, the effects of 48 h solubility values increased noticeable over the range covered. Welch (1955) has commented on the ability of oxidising and reducing atmospheres to modify the reactivity of solids by changing the concentrations of lattice defects. Thusfar, however, no such simple room-temperature effects as those described here have been reported. 

The photographs of the PLA membranes in this study are shown in Figure 3.8. The PLA membranes immersed in 24 separate solvents were prepared (i.e., insoluble) for solubility testing. The degree of cloudiness can be classified into four types clear transparency membranes (Type I), slightly cloudy membranes (Type II), cloudy membranes (Type III), and creamy white membranes (Type IV). Type I membranes are clear, similar to nonimmersed membranes, and swell by less than 2 wt%. Type II membranes are... 

Addition of hydrogen peroxide to a solution of a dichromate yields the blue colour of "peroxochromic acid. This is a test for soluble chromates and dichromates. 

Multiple linear regression analysis is a widely used method, in this case assuming that a linear relationship exists between solubility and the 18 input variables. The multilinear regression analy.si.s was performed by the SPSS program [30]. The training set was used to build a model, and the test set was used for the prediction of solubility. The MLRA model provided, for the training set, a correlation coefficient r = 0.92 and a standard deviation of, s = 0,78, and for the test set, r = 0.94 and s = 0.68. 

All solubility determinations for Group tests are carried out at the laboratory temperature in small test-tubes (e.g., 100 X 12 mm.) but of suflScient size to permit of vigorous shaking of the solvent and the solute. 

Analysis. Specifications and tests for soluble CN have been adopted by ASTM and are described (48,73—75). Brief descriptions of the most important tests are given here. 

The chosen coordinates defining minimum/maximum pH levels and minimum/maximum phosphate (as ppm P04) led to the production of various coordinated phosphate program control charts for different pressure ratings (maximum phosphate solubility is a function of pressure). The area within the coordinates providies a simple control box for BW testing purposes. 

Initially, the co-agents were mixed with PVDF and FMVQ separately and the mixtures were subjected to mild irradiation. Solubility tests indicated no cross-hnking during this operation. The polymeric components were then mixed in the presence of CaO/MgO in a Brabender plasticorder at a rotor speed of 60 rpm at 160°C. Subsequently, the temperature was lowered to 130°C and a 0.2% benzoyl peroxide paste was added. Mixing was continued for 10 more minutes. Cure characteristics... 

Worker safety studies are not likely to normally include a control substance (i.e., a material used in the study to serve as basis of comparison with the test substance). However, if a control substance is included as a treatment group, then it must (1) be fully characterized as to its identity, purity (or strength), and stability (and solubility, if appropriate) (2) be appropriately tested in mixtures with any carrier used and (3) meet all the other GLP recordkeeping, labeling, and storage requirements, as specified for the test substance. There is some regulatory relief here, however, in that water, by definition, is excluded from being considered a control substance, and vehicles (those substances added to enhance solubilization or dispersion of the test substance) are addressed separately in the FIFRA GLP Standards. 

---