Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fluorescence microscopy samples

Noise can be also introduced by biochemical heterogeneity of the specimen. This can be a major cause of uncertainty in biological imaging. The high (three-dimensional) spatial resolution of fluorescence microscopy results in low numbers of fluorophores in the detection volume. In a typical biological sample, the number of fluorophores in the detection volume can be as low as 2-3 fluorophores for a confocal microscope equipped with a high NA objective at a fluorescent dye concentration of 100 nM. This introduces another source of noise for imaging applications, chemical or molecular noise, related to the inherent randomness of diffusion and the interaction of molecules. [Pg.126]

As mentioned above, spectral imaging microscopy is a form of multidimensional fluorescent microscopy where a fluorescent emission spectrum is acquired at each coordinate location in the sample. This mode of imaging has been implemented for wide field, confocal, and two-photon laser scanning microscopy, and several excellent... [Pg.363]

In Figure 1.31, we show fluorescence microscopy images of a sample after 20, 60, and 470-min and 162-h reaction time at 88°C. The images were obtained by... [Pg.54]

Fluorescence microscopy is routinely used to study the location and movement of intracellular species. In general, the fluorescence image reflects the location and concentration of the probe, or that amount of probe remaining in a photobleached sample (Figure 1.8, lower left). Consequently, quantitative fluorescence microscopy... [Pg.13]

Laser microbeams offer several advantages over other fluorescence excitation techniques. In spectrofluorometry, observations are often made on a population of cells in a cuvette, resulting in a combined signal that lacks information about individual cellular responses. In flow cytometry, many individual cells are measured, but there is no temporal resolution since each cell is observed only once, and there is no spatial resolution since the entire cell is illuminated as it passes through the laser beam (see Chapter 30). In conventional fluorescence microscopy, individual cells can be monitored over time, and information about the two-dimensional spatial distribution of fluorescence can be obtained. However, some samples may be more susceptible to photobleaching by the arc lamps used for excitation, and the temporal resolution is limited to video-rate data acquisition (30 frames/s) (see Chapter 14). [Pg.161]

In Fig. 12 in Ref 25, fluorescence microscopy images of different dye-loaded zeolite L single crystals are shown. Each line consists of three pictures of the same sample, but with different polarizations of the fluorescence observed. In the first one, the total fluorescence of the crystals is shown, and in the others, the fluorescence with the polarization direction indicated by the arrows is displayed. The zeolite was loaded with the following dyes (A) Py+, (B) PyGY", (C) PyB +, (D) POPOP (see Table 1). Most crystals show a typical sandwich structure with fluorescent dyes at the crystal ends and a dark zone in the middle. This situation can be observed when the diffusion of the dyes in the channels has not yet reached its equilibrium situation. It illustrates nicely how the molecules penetrate the crystals via the two openings on each side of the one-dimensional channels. [Pg.333]

In this chapter we explore several aspects of interferometric nonlinear microscopy. Our discussion is limited to methods that employ narrowband laser excitation i.e., interferences in the spectral domain are beyond the scope of this chapter. Phase-controlled spectral interferometry has been used extensively in broadband CARS microspectroscopy (Cui et al. 2006 Dudovich et al. 2002 Kee et al. 2006 Lim et al. 2005 Marks and Boppart 2004 Oron et al. 2003 Vacano et al. 2006), in addition to several applications in SHG (Tang et al. 2006) and two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy (Ando et al. 2002 Chuntonov et al. 2008 Dudovich et al. 2001 Tang et al. 2006). Here, we focus on interferences in the temporal and spatial domains for the purpose of generating new contrast mechanisms in the nonlinear imaging microscope. Special emphasis is given to the CARS technique, because it is sensitive to the phase response of the sample caused by the presence of spectroscopic resonances. [Pg.215]

Figure 9.29 Membrane formation by meteoritic amphiphilic compounds (courtesy of David Deamer). A sample of the Murchison meteorite was extracted with the chloroform-methanol-water solvent described by Deamer and Pashley, 1989. Amphiphilic compounds were isolated chromatographically on thin-layer chromatography plates (fraction 1), and a small aliquot ( 1 p,g) was dried on a glass microscope slide. Alkaline carbonate buffer (15 p,l, 10 mM, pH 9.0) was added to the dried sample, followed by a cover slip, and the interaction of the aqueous phase with the sample was followed by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy, (a) The sample-buffer interface was 1 min. The aqueous phase penetrated the viscous sample, causing spherical structures to appear at the interface and fall away into the medium, (b) After 30 min, large numbers of vesicular structures are produced as the buffer further penetrates the sample, (c) The vesicular nature of the structures in (b) is clearly demonstrated by fluorescence microscopy. Original magnification in (a) is x 160 in (b) and (c) x 400. Figure 9.29 Membrane formation by meteoritic amphiphilic compounds (courtesy of David Deamer). A sample of the Murchison meteorite was extracted with the chloroform-methanol-water solvent described by Deamer and Pashley, 1989. Amphiphilic compounds were isolated chromatographically on thin-layer chromatography plates (fraction 1), and a small aliquot ( 1 p,g) was dried on a glass microscope slide. Alkaline carbonate buffer (15 p,l, 10 mM, pH 9.0) was added to the dried sample, followed by a cover slip, and the interaction of the aqueous phase with the sample was followed by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy, (a) The sample-buffer interface was 1 min. The aqueous phase penetrated the viscous sample, causing spherical structures to appear at the interface and fall away into the medium, (b) After 30 min, large numbers of vesicular structures are produced as the buffer further penetrates the sample, (c) The vesicular nature of the structures in (b) is clearly demonstrated by fluorescence microscopy. Original magnification in (a) is x 160 in (b) and (c) x 400.

See other pages where Fluorescence microscopy samples is mentioned: [Pg.189]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.1666]    [Pg.1670]    [Pg.1673]    [Pg.2485]    [Pg.2487]    [Pg.2488]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.902]    [Pg.1626]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.199]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.46 , Pg.50 , Pg.51 , Pg.52 ]




SEARCH



Fluorescence microscopy

Microscopy fluorescent

Sample Fluorescence

Sample microscopy

Sampling microscopy

© 2024 chempedia.info