Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phase transitions fluctuations

Ohmine and M. Sasai, Prog. Theor. Phys. Supplement, 103, 61 (1991). Relaxations, Fluctuations, Phase Transitions and Chemical Reactions in Liquid Water. [Pg.138]

Zhang Z, Zuckermann M J and Mouritsen O G 1993 Phase transition and director fluctuations in the 3-dimensional Lebwohl-Lasher model of liquid crystals/Mo/. Phys. 80 1195-221... [Pg.2286]

Undoubtedly the most successful model of the nematic-smectic A phase transition is the Landau-de Gennes model [201. It is applied in the case of a second-order phase transition by combining a Landau expansion for the free energy in tenns of an order parameter for smectic layering with the elastic energy of the nematic phase [20]. It is first convenient to introduce an order parameter for the smectic stmcture, which allows both for the layer periodicity (at the first hannonic level, cf equation (C2.2A)) and the fluctuations of layer position ur [20] ... [Pg.2559]

Of the variety of quantum effects which are present at low temperatures we focus here mainly on delocalization effects due to the position-momentum uncertainty principle. Compared to purely classical systems, the quantum delocalization introduces fluctuations in addition to the thermal fluctuations. This may result in a decrease of phase transition temperatures as compared to a purely classical system under otherwise unchanged conditions. The ground state order may decrease as well. From the experimental point of view it is rather difficult to extract the amount of quantumness of the system. The delocahzation can become so pronounced that certain phases are stable in contrast to the case in classical systems. We analyze these effects in Sec. V, in particular the phase transitions in adsorbed N2, H2 and D2 layers. [Pg.80]

The central quantity is the order parameter as a function of temperature (see Fig. 13). The phase transition temperature Tq of the classical system can be located around 38 K. At high temperatures, the quantum curve of the order parameter merges with the classical curve, whereas it starts to deviate below Tq. Qualitatively, quantum fluctuations lower the ordering and thus the quantum order parameter is always smaller than its classical counterpart. The inclusion of quantum effects results in a nearly 10% lowering of Tq (see Fig. 13). [Pg.116]

Furthermore, one can infer quantitatively from the data in Fig. 13 that the quantum system cannot reach the maximum herringbone ordering even at extremely low temperatures the quantum hbrations depress the saturation value by 10%. In Fig. 13, the order parameter and total energy as obtained from the full quantum simulation are compared with standard approximate theories valid for low and high temperatures. One can clearly see how the quasi classical Feynman-Hibbs curve matches the exact quantum data above 30 K. However, just below the phase transition, this second-order approximation in the quantum fluctuations fails and yields uncontrolled estimates just below the point of failure it gives classical values for the order parameter and the herringbone ordering even vanishes below... [Pg.116]

Note that large density fluctuations are suppressed by construction in a random lattice model. In order to include them, one could simply simulate a mixture of hard disks with internal conformational degrees of freedom. Very simple models of this kind, where the conformational degrees of freedom affect only the size or the shape of the disks, have been studied by Fraser et al. [206]. They are found to exhibit a broad spectrum of possible phase transitions. [Pg.665]

Typical runs consist of 100 000 up to 300 000 MC moves per lattice site. Far from the phase transition in the lamellar phase, the typical equilibration run takes 10 000 Monte Carlo steps per site (MCS). In the vicinity of the phase transitions the equilibration takes up to 200 000 MCS. For the rough estimate of the equihbration time one can monitor internal energy as well as the Euler characteristic. The equilibration time for the energy and Euler characteristic are roughly the same. For go = /o = 0 it takes 10 000 MCS to obtain the equilibrium configuration in which one finds the lamellar phase without passages and consequently the Euler characteristic is zero. For go = —3.15 and/o = 0 (close to the phase transition) it takes more than 50 000 MCS for the equihbration and here the Euler characteristic fluctuates around its mean value of —48. [Pg.714]

An intrinsic surface is built up between both phases in coexistence at a first-order phase transition. For the hard sphere crystal-melt interface [51] density, pressure and stress profiles were calculated, showing that the transition from crystal to fluid occurs over a narrow range of only two to three crystal layers. Crystal growth rate constants of a Lennard-Jones (100) surface [52] were calculated from the fluctuations of interfaces. There is evidence for bcc ordering at the surface of a critical fee nucleus [53]. [Pg.760]

At higher temperatures, other degrees of freedom than the radius R must also be considered in the fluctuation. However, this becomes critical only near the critical point where the system goes through a phase transition of second order. The nucleation arrangement described here is for heterogeneous or two-dimensional nucleation on a flat surface. In the bulk, there is also the formation of a three-dimensional nucleation, but its rate is smaller ... [Pg.867]

An ordering phase transition is characterized by a loss of symmetry the ordered phase has less symmetry than the disordered one. Hence, an ordering process leads to the coexistence of different domains of the same ordered phase. An interface forms whenever two such domains contact. The thermodynamic behavior of this interface is governed by different forces. The presence of the underlying lattice and the stability of the ordered domains tend to localize the interface and to reduce its width. On the other hand, thermal fluctuations favor an interfacial wandering and an increase of the interface width. The result of this competition depends strongly on the order of the bulk phase transition. [Pg.121]

In general terms, the phenomena described above belong to the class of phase transitions and critical phenomena in confined spaces. From the field of statistical physics, some far-reaching results applying to such problems are knovm. One fruitful concept used in statistical physics is the correlation length (see, e.g., [64]). The correlation length describes how a local field quantity evaluated at one point in space is correlated with the same quantity at another point. As an example, the correlation length crfor density fluctuations in a fluid is defined via... [Pg.143]

Ammonium alums undergo phase transitions at Tc 80 K. The phase transitions result in critical lattice fluctuations which are very slow close to Tc. The contribution to the relaxation frequency, shown by the dotted line in Fig. 6.7, was calculated using a model for direct spin-lattice relaxation processes due to interaction between the low-energy critical phonon modes and electronic spins. [Pg.212]

I2H2O as a function of the reciprocal temperature. The points are data obtained from fits of the Mdssbauer spectra (Fig. 6.6). The broken curve is a fit to the Einstein model for a Raman process. The dotted curve corresponds to a contribution from a direct process due to interactions between the electronic spins and low-energy phonons associated with critical fluctuations near the phase transition temperature. (Reprinted with permission from [32] copyright 1979 by the Institute of Physics)... [Pg.214]

The most developed and widely used approach to electroporation and membrane rupture views pore formation as a result of large nonlinear fluctuations, rather than loss of stability for small (linear) fluctuations. This theory of electroporation has been intensively reviewed [68-70], and we will discuss it only briefly. The approach is similar to the theory of crystal defect formation or to the phenomenology of nucleation in first-order phase transitions. The idea of applying this approach to pore formation in bimolecular free films can be traced back to the work of Deryagin and Gutop [71]. [Pg.84]

Here w is a weighting factor. Asr (s) is the absorption factor (in this case for symmetrical absorption), Hz (5) and In consider the non-ideal character of the two-phase topology (cf. p. 124, Fig. 8.10) by consideration of a smooth phase transition zone and density fluctuations inside the phases. [Pg.201]

Figure 8.47. SRSAXS raw data (open symbols) and model fit (solid line) for a nano structured material using a finite lattice model. The model components are demonstrated absorption factor Asr, density fluctuation background Ipu smooth phase transition/. The solid monotonous line demonstrates the shape of the Porod law in the raw data. At sq the absorption is switching from fully illuminated sample to partial illumination of the sample... Figure 8.47. SRSAXS raw data (open symbols) and model fit (solid line) for a nano structured material using a finite lattice model. The model components are demonstrated absorption factor Asr, density fluctuation background Ipu smooth phase transition/. The solid monotonous line demonstrates the shape of the Porod law in the raw data. At sq the absorption is switching from fully illuminated sample to partial illumination of the sample...
Now we consider thermodynamic properties of the system described by the Hamiltonian (2.4.5) it is a generalized Hamiltonian of the isotropic Ashkin-Teller model100,101 expressed in terms of interactions between pairs of spins lattice site nm of a square lattice. Hamiltonian (2.4.5) differs from the known one in that it includes not only the contribution from the four-spin interaction (the term with the coefficient J3), but also the anisotropic contribution (the term with the coefficient J2) which accounts for cross interactions of spins a m and s m between neighboring lattice sites. This term is so structured that it vanishes if there are no fluctuation interactions between cr- and s-subsystems. As a result, with sufficiently small coefficients J2, we arrive at a typical phase diagram of the isotropic Ashkin-Teller model,101 102 limited by the plausible values of coefficients in Eq. (2.4.6). At J, > J3, the phase transition line... [Pg.44]


See other pages where Phase transitions fluctuations is mentioned: [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.2370]    [Pg.2832]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.799]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.47]   


SEARCH



Fluctuating phases

Phase fluctuations

© 2024 chempedia.info