Flory felt model

In Fig. 1.3 amorphous polymers nanostructure cluster model is presented. As one can see, within the limits of the indicated above dimensional periodicity scales Fig. 1.2 and 1.3 correspond each other, that is, the cluster model assumes p reduction as far as possible from the cluster center. Let us note that well-known Flory felt model [20] does not satisfy this criterion, since for it p const. Since, as it was noted above, polymeric mediums structure fractality was confirmed experimentally repeatedly [14-16], then it is obvious, that cluster model reflects real solid-phase polymers structure quite plausibly, whereas felt model is far from reality. It is also obvious, that opposite intercommunication is true - for density p finite values change of the latter within the definite limits means obligatory availability of structure periodicity. 

In the model [98] it has been assiuned, that nucleus domain with size u is formed in defect-free part of semicrystalline polymer, that is, in crystallite. Within the frameworks of model [1] and in respect to these polymers amorphous phase structure such region is loosely packed matrix, surrounding a local order region (cluster), whose structure is close enough to defect-free polymer structure, postulated by the Flory felt model [16, 17]. In such treatment the value u can be determined as follows [43] ... 

---