Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaporation models

It should be noted that hydrolysis of these pesticides is expected to occur simultaneously with volatilization for the pesticides studied (Table I). Over a 7 day experiment, however, only malathion and mevlnphos would be expected to hydrolyze to a significant extent. We determined the loss rate of mevlnphos to be 0.0016 0.0002 hr l (tjj = 18 days), and of malathion to be 0.011 0.001 hr-1 (t j = 2.6 days) at 22 2°C, at pH 8.2+0.2 for a model evaporation pond by daily sampling of duplicate pesticide solu-Xlons (covered to prevent volatilization) for 7 days and plotting log concentration versus time. For both of these pesticides, then, degradation was a much more important route of pesticide loss from water than volatilization. The relatively slow loss rate of the other pesticides could not be determined in our 7 day... [Pg.290]

The relative importance of the two processes in a model evaporation pond, along with the time lor 97% loss of the applied pesticide (system purification time), were calculated (Table V). This calculation confirmed that mevinphos and malathion dissipated primarily by hydrolysis, with malathion the more rapid of these two chemicals. For methyl and ethyl parathion, both processes were significant, although volatilization was the dominant dissipation route. However, since both processes were relatively slow for these pesticides, the purification time was fairly long. Diazinon was predicted to be lost primarily via volatilization, and the purification time was relatively short. [Pg.292]

Rates as Predicted by EXAMS for a Model Evaporation Pond... [Pg.292]

For model evaporated binary alloy or bimetallic systems, normally a double crucible containing ingots of the two components of the alloy are used in an evaporator and the electron beam is switched between the two metallic sources. The dwell time is varied so as to obtain a uniform distribution of each metal in the required amounts on the support. [Pg.154]

To predict a volatilization rate, it is necessary to quantify how rapidly the sufficiently light species in the distribution evaporate. Some authors20 have employed relatively involved mass transfer processes in order to model evaporation in some detail. However, in the present case we shall take the view that as soon as sufficiently light species form, they immediately volatilize.27-30 For scission processes that do not involve recombination, this is tantamount to assuming that there is a characteristic number of repeat units mv below which polymer molecules are classified as volatile. So, to define the remaining mass in the distribution, consisting of nonvolatile species, the concept of a partial moment is used. The mth partial moment of the distribution is defined as... [Pg.484]

We consider methods for describing how molecules interact with aerosol particles and how to obtain molecular properties and rate constants of relevance when studying the molecular level mechanisms for the formation of aerosol particles and how these provide the basis for heterogeneous chemistry. For understanding mass and heat transfer to and from aerosol particles we need to focus on the processes related to a gas molecule as it approaches the surface of an aerosol particle. A macroscopic property related to these processes is the sticking probabilities/ mass accommodation coefficients that are used when modelling evaporation. [Pg.356]

In this problem an irreversible reaction (the addition of 0.1 and 1.0 moles of "sea salt") is used as one means of modeling evaporation (of seawater) while maintaining equilibrium with the 7 phases listed above. [Pg.135]

Dolman, A. J. and Wallace, J. S. (1991). Lagrangian and K-theory approaches in modelling evaporation from sparse canopies. Qiuirt. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 117, 1325-1340. [Pg.58]

Modeling evaporative batch crystallization is similar to batch cooUng crystallization except one has to consider the rate of evaporation of solvent dM/dt in the equation where M is the total solvent at any time. [Pg.140]

There are two approaches to explain physical mechanism of the phenomenon. The first model is based on the existence of the difference between the saturated vapor pressures above two menisci in dead-end capillary. It results in the evaporation of a liquid from the meniscus of smaller curvature ( classical capillary imbibition) and the condensation of its vapor upon the meniscus of larger curvature originally existed due to capillary condensation. [Pg.616]

Barnes and Hunter [290] have measured the evaporation resistance across octadecanol monolayers as a function of temperature to test the appropriateness of several models. The experimental results agreed with three theories the energy barrier theory, the density fluctuation theory, and the accessible area theory. A plot of the resistance times the square root of the temperature against the area per molecule should collapse the data for all temperatures and pressures as shown in Fig. IV-25. A similar temperature study on octadecylurea monolayers showed agreement with only the accessible area model [291]. [Pg.148]

Fig. IV-25. The evaporation resistance multiplied by the square root of temperature versus area per molecule for monolayers of octadecanol on water illustrating agreement with the accessible area model. (From Ref. 290.)... Fig. IV-25. The evaporation resistance multiplied by the square root of temperature versus area per molecule for monolayers of octadecanol on water illustrating agreement with the accessible area model. (From Ref. 290.)...
Figure C2.11.6. The classic two-particle sintering model illustrating material transport and neck growtli at tire particle contacts resulting in coarsening (left) and densification (right) during sintering. Surface diffusion (a), evaporation-condensation (b), and volume diffusion (c) contribute to coarsening, while volume diffusion (d), grain boundary diffusion (e), solution-precipitation (f), and dislocation motion (g) contribute to densification. Figure C2.11.6. The classic two-particle sintering model illustrating material transport and neck growtli at tire particle contacts resulting in coarsening (left) and densification (right) during sintering. Surface diffusion (a), evaporation-condensation (b), and volume diffusion (c) contribute to coarsening, while volume diffusion (d), grain boundary diffusion (e), solution-precipitation (f), and dislocation motion (g) contribute to densification.
The BET treatment is based on a kinetic model of the adsorption process put forward more than sixty years ago by Langmuir, in which the surface of the solid was regarded as an array of adsorption sites. A state of dynamic equilibrium was postulated in which the rate at which molecules arriving from the gas phrase and condensing on to bare sites is equal to the rate at which molecules evaporate from occupied sites. [Pg.42]

Thus, as pointed out by Cohan who first suggested this model, condensation and evaporation occur at difi erent relative pressures and there is hysteresis. The value of r calculated by the standard Kelvin equation (3.20) for a given uptake, will be equal to the core radius r,. if the desorption branch of the hysteresis loop is used, but equal to twice the core radius if the adsorption branch is used. The two values of should, of course, be the same in practice this is rarely found to be so. [Pg.127]

The variant of the cylindrical model which has played a prominent part in the development of the subject is the ink-bottle , composed of a cylindrical pore closed one end and with a narrow neck at the other (Fig. 3.12(a)). The course of events is different according as the core radius r of the body is greater or less than twice the core radius r of the neck. Nucleation to give a hemispherical meniscus, can occur at the base B at the relative pressure p/p°)i = exp( —2K/r ) but a meniscus originating in the neck is necessarily cylindrical so that its formation would need the pressure (P/P°)n = exp(-K/r ). If now r /r, < 2, (p/p ), is lower than p/p°)n, so that condensation will commence at the base B and will All the whole pore, neck as well as body, at the relative pressure exp( —2K/r ). Evaporation from the full pore will commence from the hemispherical meniscus in the neck at the relative pressure p/p°) = cxp(-2K/r ) and will continue till the core of the body is also empty, since the pressure is already lower than the equilibrium value (p/p°)i) for evaporation from the body. Thus the adsorption branch of the loop leads to values of the core radius of the body, and the desorption branch to values of the core radius of the neck. [Pg.128]

The pores in question can represent only a small fraction of the pore system since the amount of enhanced adsorption is invariably small. Plausible models are solids composed of packed spheres, or of plate-like particles. In the former model, pendulate rings of liquid remain around points of contact of the spheres after evaporation of the majority of the condensate if the spheres are small enough this liquid will lie wholly within the range of the surface forces of the solid. In wedge-shaped pores, which are associated with plate-like particles, the residual liquid held in the apex of the wedge will also be under the influence of surface forces. [Pg.164]

Genera.1 Ca.se, The simple adiabatic model just discussed often represents an oversimplification, since the real situation implies a multitude of heat effects (/) The heat of solution tends to increase the temperature and thus to reduce the solubihty. 2) In the case of a volatile solvent, partial solvent evaporation absorbs some of the heat. (This effect is particularly important when using water, the cheapest solvent.) (J) Heat is transferred from the hquid to the gas phase and vice versa. (4) Heat is transferred from both phase streams to the shell of the column and from the shell to the outside or to cooling cods. [Pg.29]

Aerosol Dynamics. Inclusion of a description of aerosol dynamics within air quaUty models is of primary importance because of the health effects associated with fine particles in the atmosphere, visibiUty deterioration, and the acid deposition problem. Aerosol dynamics differ markedly from gaseous pollutant dynamics in that particles come in a continuous distribution of sizes and can coagulate, evaporate, grow in size by condensation, be formed by nucleation, or be deposited by sedimentation. Furthermore, the species mass concentration alone does not fliUy characterize the aerosol. The particle size distribution, which changes as a function of time, and size-dependent composition determine the fate of particulate air pollutants and their... [Pg.382]

The vapor cloud of evaporated droplets bums like a diffusion flame in the turbulent state rather than as individual droplets. In the core of the spray, where droplets are evaporating, a rich mixture exists and soot formation occurs. Surrounding this core is a rich mixture zone where CO production is high and a flame front exists. Air entrainment completes the combustion, oxidizing CO to CO2 and burning the soot. Soot bumup releases radiant energy and controls flame emissivity. The relatively slow rate of soot burning compared with the rate of oxidation of CO and unbumed hydrocarbons leads to smoke formation. This model of a diffusion-controlled primary flame zone makes it possible to relate fuel chemistry to the behavior of fuels in combustors (7). [Pg.412]

Film thickness is an important factor iu solvent loss and film formation. In the first stage of solvent evaporation, the rate of solvent loss depends on the first power of film thickness. However, iu the second stage when the solvent loss is diffusion rate controlled, it depends on the square of the film thickness. Although thin films lose solvent more rapidly than thick films, if the T of the dryiug film iucreases to ambient temperature duriug the evaporation of the solvent, then, even iu thin films, solvent loss is extremely slow. Models have been developed that predict the rate of solvent loss from films as functions of the evaporation rate, thickness, temperature, and concentration of solvent iu the film (9). [Pg.334]

The discussion of laminar diffusion flame theory addresses both the gaseous diffusion flames and the single-drop evaporation and combustion, as there are some similarities between gaseous and Hquid diffusion flame theories (2). A frequentiy used model of diffusion flames has been developed (34), and despite some of the restrictive assumptions of the model, it gives a good description of diffusion flame behavior. [Pg.519]

Evaporation and burning of Hquid droplets are of particular interest in furnace and propulsion appHcations and by applying a part of the Burke and Schumann approach it is possible to obtain a simple model for diffusion flames. [Pg.519]

Most theories of droplet combustion assume a spherical, symmetrical droplet surrounded by a spherical flame, for which the radii of the droplet and the flame are denoted by and respectively. The flame is supported by the fuel diffusing from the droplet surface and the oxidant from the outside. The heat produced in the combustion zone ensures evaporation of the droplet and consequently the fuel supply. Other assumptions that further restrict the model include (/) the rate of chemical reaction is much higher than the rate of diffusion and hence the reaction is completed in a flame front of infinitesimal thickness (2) the droplet is made up of pure Hquid fuel (J) the composition of the ambient atmosphere far away from the droplet is constant and does not depend on the combustion process (4) combustion occurs under steady-state conditions (5) the surface temperature of the droplet is close or equal to the boiling point of the Hquid and (6) the effects of radiation, thermodiffusion, and radial pressure changes are negligible. [Pg.520]

Theoretical modeling of single-droplet combustion has provided expressions for evaporation and burning times of the droplets and the subsequent coke particles. A more thorough treatment of this topic is available (88,91—93,98). [Pg.526]

Control of supersaturation is an important factor in obtaining crystal size distributions of desired characteristics, and it would be useful to have a model relating rate of cooling or evaporation or addition of diluent required to maintain a specified supersaturation in the crystallizer. Contrast this to the uncontrolled situation of natural cooling in which the heat transfer rate is given by... [Pg.355]


See other pages where Evaporation models is mentioned: [Pg.130]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.3237]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.2002]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.3237]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.2002]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.750]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.554 ]




SEARCH



Behavioral model evaporator

Clusters evaporation model

Dynamic model evaporators

Evaporation models, agricultural

Evaporation, liquid pools, model

Evaporation-condensation model

Evaporative ensemble model

Evaporator model assumptions

Evaporator model equations

Flash and evaporation models

Ion evaporation model

Modeling Evaporative Batch Crystallization

Modeling evaporators

Predictive model fuel evaporation

Solvent evaporation model

Water model evaporation example

© 2024 chempedia.info