Federal-aid projects

A skid resistant surface is an essential part of any pavement surface improvement, regardless of the scope of geometric problems or upgrading. Current policy requires that each Federal-aid project, including RRR projects, involving pavement construction shall provide a skid resistant surface. 

NEPA (Federal-Aid projects) NEPA Assessment Checklist is completed and the project is determined... 

Federal-Aid Highway Acts. The provisions codified in 23 U.S.C. 113 apply to the initial construction, reconstruction, or improvement work performed by contractors or subcontractors on highway projects on the Federal-aid systems, the primary and... 

Freeway RRR Projects (9). The purpose of the advisory is to provide guidance on developing or modifying criteria for the design of federal-aid, nonfreeway 3R projects. The technical advisory—... 

Are 3R Standards/Guidelines for Non-NHS Projects the Same for Both Federal-Aid and State-Aid Projects ... 

The complete responses to this question are found in Appendix D, Table D2. Only 7 of the 48 states indicated that their standards are different for non-NHS projects, depending on the funding source. However, reviewing the reasons and comments provided by these states reveals only minor variations. For example, one state responded that a new section on railroad crossing upgrades in or near a 3R project applies to federal-aid but not state-aid projects. Another state responded no, but commented that its 3R policy applies to all roads in the state highway system. 

Are your 3R standards/ guidelines for non-NHS projects the same for both Federal-aid and State-... 

State 3R policies same for National Highway Systems (NHS) projects and for non-NHS projects If No, Please explain 3R policies non-NHS projects the same for both federal-aid and state-aid projects If No, please explain... 

FL No No New section on railroad crossings upgrades in or near the project apply to federal-aid but not state-funded. 

Tide V of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 covers federally approved state operating permits for manufacturing faciUties. One requirement of this regulation is that manufacturers must report emissions information of identified ha2ardous air pollutants specific to thein operation from a list of 189 named in the Clean Air Act Amendments. Rubber and tine manufacturers had to meet this requirement by the end of 1995. The Rubber Manufacturers Association has begun an industrywide project to develop accurate and reliable emissions data to aid manufacturers to comply with these requinements (44). 

This chapter is a reflection of the research work carried out and financed by a PETRI Research and Technological Project (PTR 1995-0592-OP-03-03), Ministry of Education and Science Project (AGL-2003-05236-C02-02 and AGL-2006-13320-C02-03, FEDER), and the Generalitat Valenciana s Aid to Research Groups (Groups 03/147). The authors would also like to thank the J. Garcia Carrion S.A. organization for the interest shown and help provided throughout these years in the research carried out. 

Reasons other than the issues cited in the petitions, especially politics and the chronic issue of public versus private power, helped persuade the union leadership to intervene. Political considerations arose because 1956 was an election year. The matter of public or private financing was important to labor because of the AFL-CIO s support for both federally funded atomic-power projects and more aid to smaller public and cooperative utilities. 

Mr Hopton, Mr Shrimpton, and Lord Hinton questioned how the wearing of hard hats and safety belts was enforced. The use of hard hats and safety boots was a condition of employment on the project in that it was written into the Union Agreement. The use of other protective equipment was enforced in the various provincial and federal statutes under which the work is carried out. Employees failing to comply with safety aids are subject to dismissal. 

---