Failure criteria maximum stress criterion

If the fibres are aligned at 15° to the jc-direction, calculate what tensile value of Ox will cause failure according to (i) the Maximum Stress Criterion (ii) the Maximum Strain Criterion and (iii) the Tsai-Hill Criterion. The thickness of the composite is 1 mm. 

A single ply glass/epoxy composite has the properties Usted below. If the fibres are aligned at 30° to the x-direction, determine the value of in-plane stresses, a, which would cause failure according to (a) the Maximum Stress criterion (b) the Maximum Strain criterion and (c) the Tsai-Hill criterion. 

The results of the experiments were analysed according to continuum mechanics as v/ell as fracture mechanics principles. The evaluation of the stress at failure as well as the energy released are used to evaluate the validity of, respectively, a maximum stress criterion energy approach as a failure criterion. 

The total stress at the occurrence of the first transverse crack is the principal stress, and it is therefore possible to use a Maximum Stress Criterion as a failure criterion. It is simply performed by comparing the stress at the occurrence of the first transverse crack to the strength of the layer. In other words, failure occurs when ... 

Failure Analysis Using Maximum Stress Criterion... 

Criteria of Elastic Failure. Of the criteria of elastic failure which have been formulated, the two most important for ductile materials are the maximum shear stress criterion and the shear strain energy criterion. According to the former criterion, from equation 7... 

The strength of laminates is usually predicted from a combination of laminated plate theory and a failure criterion for the individual larnina. A general treatment of composite failure criteria is beyond the scope of the present discussion. Broadly, however, composite failure criteria are of two types noninteractive, such as maximum stress or maximum strain, in which the lamina is taken to fail when a critical value of stress or strain is reached parallel or transverse to the fibers in tension, compression, or shear or interactive, such as the Tsai-Hill or Tsai-Wu (1,7) type, in which failure is taken to be when some combination of stresses occurs. Generally, the ply materials do not have the same strengths in tension and compression, so that five-ply strengths must be deterrnined ... 

Subsection A This subsection contains the general requirements applicable to all materials and methods of construction. Design temperature and pressure are defined here, and the loadings to be considered in design are specified. For stress failure and yielding, this section of the code uses the maximum-stress theory of failure as its criterion. 

The decrease in with crack depth for fracture of IG-11 graphite presents an interesting dilemma. The utihty of fracture mechanics is that equivalent values of K should represent an equivalent crack tip mechanical state and a singular critical value of K should define the failure criterion. Recall Eq. 2 where K is defined as the first term of the series solution for the crack tip stress field, Oy, normal to the crack plane. It was noted that this solution must be modified at the crack tip and at the far field. The maximum value of a. should be limited to and that the far... 

In the maximum stress failure criterion, each and every one of the stresses in principal material coordinates must be less than the respective strengths otherwise, fracture is said to have occurred. That is, for tensile stresses,... 

Figure 2-37 Maximum Stress Failure Criterion (After Tsai [2-21])...

The maximum strain failure criterion is quite similar to the maximum stress failure criterion. However, here strains are limited rather than stresses. Specifically, the material is said to have failed if one or more of the following inequalities is not satisfied ... 

The only difference between the maximum strain failure criterion. Equation (2.125), and the maximum stress failure criterion, Equation (2.118), is the inclusion of Poisson s ratio terms in the maximum strain failure criterion. 

As with the maximum stress failure criterion, the maximum strain failure criterion can be plotted against available experimental results for uniaxial loading of an off-axis composite material. The discrepancies between experimental results and the prediction in Figure 2-38 are similar to, but even more pronounced than, those for the maximum stress failure criterion in Figure 2-37. Thus, the appropriate failure criterion for this E-glass-epoxy composite material still has not been found. 

The Tsai-Hill failure criterion appears to be much more applicable to failure prediction for this E-glass-epoxy composite material than either the maximum stress criterion or the maximum strain failure criterion. Other less obvious advantages of the Tsai-Hill failure criterion are ... 

For E-glass-epoxy, the Tsai-Hill failure criterion seems the most accurate of the criteria discussed. However, the applicability of a particular failure criterion depends on whether the material being studied is ductile or brittle. Other composite materials might be better treated with the maximum stress or the maximum strain criteria or even some other criterion. 

The maximum principal stress criterion for failure simply states that failure (by yielding or by fracture) would occur when the maximum principal stress reaches a critical value (ie., the material s yield strength, ays, or fracture strength, a/, or tensile strength, aurs)- For a three-dimensional state of stress, given in terms of the Cartesian coordinates x, y, and z in Fig. 2.1 and represented by the left-hand matrix in Eqn. (2.1), a set of principal stresses (see Fig. 2.1) can be readily obtained by transformation ... 

This failure criterion is given in terms of the octahedral shearing stress, ft is identical to the maximum distortion energy criterion, except that it is expressed in stress versus energy units. The criterion, expressed in terms of the principal stresses, is given in Eqn. (2.9). 

It is worthwhile to consider whether the classical theories (or criteria) of failure can still be applied if the stress (or strain) concentration effects of geometric discontinuities (eg., notches and cracks) are properly taken into account. In other words, one might define a (theoretical) stress concentration factor, for example, to account for the elevation of local stress by the geometric discontinuity in a material and still make use of the maximum principal stress criterion to predict its strength, or load-carrying capability. 

---