Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Exposure percentage

The unknown interface velocity is modeled as an exponentially decaying function of the vapor-exposed screen length as shown in Figure 14.5, beised on analysis of velocity profiles for the 1-gIAD modeling and on outflow data from Chapter 9. Simulations indicate that the interface velocity is actually fairly insensitive to the assumed profile. For comparison, several interfacial velocity functional profiles (e.g. linear, exponential) were assumed, and results indicated that the screen exposure percentage at breakdown differed... [Pg.351]

FIGURE 14.6 Velocity Vector Plots at Increasing Screen Exposure Percentages (LowerTank Fill Levels) for a 325 x 2300 Liquid Acquisition Device Screen and Channel in Liquid Hydrogen at a Demand Flow Rate of 0.01 kg/s. Color represents magnitude of velocity. [Pg.353]

Surfactant Test animal Effects of exposure (percentage by weight in diet of maximal dose given)... [Pg.111]

Skin and Eye Irritation. Fatty alkylamines are generally considered to be irritating to both the skin and eyes (83). The severity or degree of irritation is usually dependent on the type of alkylamine, concentration of the chemical, time of exposure to the chemical, and sensitivity to the chemical. A small percentage of the population who come into contact with fatty amines may develop a skin hypersensitivity to certain amines and diamines. [Pg.223]

AATCC methods for determining water repeUency are AATCC 22 (spray test) and AATCC 70 (tumble jar dynamic absorption test). In the spray test, water is sprayed against the taut surface of the test specimen to produce a wetted pattern the size of which depends on the repeUency of the fabric. Evaluation is by comparing the pattern with a series of patterns on a standard chart. The latter method evaluates the percentage by weight of water absorbed by a sample after dynamic exposure to water for a specified period of time. [Pg.461]

Aquatic toxicity is becoming (ca 1997) a permit requirement on all discharges. Aquatic toxicity is generally reported as an LC q (the percentage of wastewater which causes the death of 50% of the test organisms in a specified period ie, 48 or 96 h, or as a no observed effect level (NOEL), in which the NOEL is the highest effluent concentration at which no unacceptable effect will occur, even at continuous exposure. [Pg.178]

Stress relaxation performance is usually determined in bending, where the initially imposed stress is 50 to 100% of the yield strength at the tension side of the stressed samples. Test details are presented in Reference 23. Data is presented as the percentage of the initial stress that remains as a function of time at exposure temperature. [Pg.225]

In nonindustrial settings, MCS substances are the cause of indoor air pollution and are the contaminants in air and water. Many of the chemicals which trigger MCS symptoms are known to be irritants or toxic to the nervous system. As an example, volatile organic compounds readily evaporate into the air at room temperature. Permitted airborne levels of such contaminants can still make ordinary people sick. When the human body is assaulted with levels of toxic chemicals that it cannot safely process, it is likely that at some point an individual will become ill. For some, the outcome could be cancer or reproductive damage. Others may become hypersensitive to these chemicals or develop other chronic disorders, while some people may not experience any noticeable health effects. Even where high levels of exposure occur, generally only a small percentage of people become chemically sensitive. [Pg.45]

Industrial environments expose individuals to a plethora of airborne chemical compounds in the form of vapors, aerosols, or biphasic mixtures of both. These atmospheric contaminants primarily interface with two body surfaces the respiratory tract and the skin. Between these two routes of systemic exposure to airborne chemicals (inhalation and transdermal absorption) the respiratory tract has the larger surface area and a much greater percentage of this surface exposed to the ambient environment. Or dinary work clothing generally restricts skin exposures to the arms, neck, and head, and special protective clothing ensembles further limit or totally eliminate skin exposures, but breathing exposes much of the airway to contaminants. [Pg.195]

Based upon the various sources of adult consumer exposure to organotin compounds (section 6) and the TDI values derived above, it is possible to estimate the relative exposure from the various organotin compounds expressed as a percentage of the TDI values. The exposure calculations in section 6 were based on a realistic worst-case exposure assessment. Table 26 presents the results of this risk characterization. [Pg.38]

In a case-control study of pesticide factory workers in Brazil exposed to methyl parathion and formulating solvents, the incidence of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes was investigated (De Cassia Stocco et al. 1982). Though dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) was coformulated with methyl parathion, blood DDT levels in the methyl parathion-examined workers and "nonexposed" workers were not significantly different. These workers were presumably exposed to methyl parathion via both inhalation and dermal routes however, a dose level was not reported. The exposed workers showed blood cholinesterase depressions between 50 and 75%. However, the baseline blood cholinesterase levels in nonexposed workers were not reported. No increases in the percentage of lymphocytes with chromosome breaks were found in 15 of these workers who were exposed to methyl parathion from 1 week to up to 7 years as compared with controls. The controls consisted of 13 men who had not been occupationally exposed to any chemical and were of comparable age and socioeconomic level. This study is limited because of concomitant exposure to formulating solvents, the recent history of exposure for the workers was not reported, the selection of the control group was not described adequately, and the sample size was limited. [Pg.81]


See other pages where Exposure percentage is mentioned: [Pg.205]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.1014]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.1011]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.309]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.284 ]




SEARCH



Percentage

© 2024 chempedia.info