Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experimental parameter values

For typical experimental parameter values (a =0.5, NM-1019 atom/m2, P,=l D=3.3-10 30 C-m, T=673) the dimensionless parameter IT equals 32 which implies, in view of equation (11.12), dramatic rate enhancement ratio p values (e.g. p =120) even for moderate (-15%) changes in the coverage 0j of the promoting backspillover species, as experimentally observed. [Pg.502]

The relatively simple two-enzymes/two-compartments model is thus represented in (4.101) via the above set of eight coupled ordinary nonlinear differential equations (4.103) to (4.106). This system of IVPs has the eight state variables hj(t), sy(t), S2j(t), ssj(t) for j = 1,2 that depend on the time t. The normalized reaction rates rj t) are given in equations (4.107) and (4.108). The system has 26 parameters that describe the dynamics for all compounds considered in the two compartments. A specific list of validated experimental parameter values follows in Section 4.4.5. [Pg.231]

Curves based on experimental parameter values in Ref. [73], Table 11-5-1. [Pg.291]

Figure 4 Temperature dependence of A 2 as given by equation (116) with various combinations of /cj, /c2 and All curves fit experimentai values of u, B and l for polystyrene + cyclopentane. The dashed curve is Eichinger s approximation (/c2 = /C3 = 0). The four solid curves fit the experimental Bl as well as the three other experimental parameters values of are (a) — 270 (b) 0 (c) 180 and (d) 680 (reproduced by permission of Wiley, from J. Polym. Set, Part B Polym. Phys., 1987,... Figure 4 Temperature dependence of A 2 as given by equation (116) with various combinations of /cj, /c2 and All curves fit experimentai values of u, B and l for polystyrene + cyclopentane. The dashed curve is Eichinger s approximation (/c2 = /C3 = 0). The four solid curves fit the experimental Bl as well as the three other experimental parameters values of are (a) — 270 (b) 0 (c) 180 and (d) 680 (reproduced by permission of Wiley, from J. Polym. Set, Part B Polym. Phys., 1987,...
If this criterion is based on the maximum-likelihood principle, it leads to those parameter values that make the experimental observations appear most likely when taken as a whole. The likelihood function is defined as the joint probability of the observed values of the variables for any set of true values of the variables, model parameters, and error variances. The best estimates of the model parameters and of the true values of the measured variables are those which maximize this likelihood function with a normal distribution assumed for the experimental errors. [Pg.98]

In the maximum-likelihood method used here, the "true" value of each measured variable is also found in the course of parameter estimation. The differences between these "true" values and the corresponding experimentally measured values are the residuals (also called deviations). When there are many data points, the residuals can be analyzed by standard statistical methods (Draper and Smith, 1966). If, however, there are only a few data points, examination of the residuals for trends, when plotted versus other system variables, may provide valuable information. Often these plots can indicate at a glance excessive experimental error, systematic error, or "lack of fit." Data points which are obviously bad can also be readily detected. If the model is suitable and if there are no systematic errors, such a plot shows the residuals randomly distributed with zero means. This behavior is shown in Figure 3 for the ethyl-acetate-n-propanol data of Murti and Van Winkle (1958), fitted with the van Laar equation. [Pg.105]

The relationship between tire theoretical quantity i-j and the experimental parameter e of absorption spectroscopy involves, not the value of e at any one wavelengdi, but its integral over the absorption band. The relationship is... [Pg.1126]

If the experimental values P and w are closely reproduced by the correlating equation for g, then these residues, evaluated at the experimental values of X, scatter about zero. This is the result obtained when the data are thermodynamically consistent. When they are not, these residuals do not scatter about zero, and the correlation for g does not properly reproduce the experimental values P and y . Such a correlation is, in fact, unnecessarily divergent. An alternative is to process just the P-X data this is possible because the P-x -y data set includes more information than necessary. Assuming that the correlating equation is appropriate to the data, one merely searches for values of the parameters Ot, b, and so on, that yield pressures by Eq. (4-295) that are as close as possible to the measured values. The usual procedure is to minimize the sum of squares of the residuals 6P. Known as Barkers method Austral. ]. Chem., 6, pp. 207-210 [1953]), it provides the best possible fit of the experimental pressures. When the experimental data do not satisfy the Gibbs/Duhem equation, it cannot precisely represent the experimental y values however, it provides a better fit than does the procedure that minimizes the sum of the squares of the 6g residuals. [Pg.537]

Worth noting is the fact that Barkers method does not require experimental yf values. Thus the correlating parameters Ot, b, and so on, can be ev uated from a P-X data subset. Common practice now is, in fact, to measure just such data. They are, of course, not subject to a test for consistency by the Gibbs/Duhem equation. The worlds store of X T.E data has been compiled by Gmehling et al. (Vapor-Liquid Lquilibiium Data Collection, Chemistiy Data Series, vol. I, parts 1-8, DECHEMA, Frankfurt am Main, 1979-1990). [Pg.537]

Ab initio methods, unlike either molecular mechanics or semi-empirical methods, use no experimental parameters in their computations. Instead, their computations are based solely on the laws of quantum mechanics—the first principles referred to in the name ah initio—and on the values of a small number of physical constants ... [Pg.5]

Rate constants (fifth column) usually correspond to one of the temperatures reported in the original papers and may be either experimentally determined values or those calculated from the activation parameters. In the preparation of the present review, the author has normalized a number of rate constants at arbitrary temperatures to permit direct comparisons with other data these normalized values and temperatures are tabulated (in italics) with the hope that they will offer additional useful information. The rate constants are usually expressed in liter x mole x sec when the values are followed by the symbol (A i) the units are sec. and dH are in kcal/mole JS is in eu. [Pg.359]

The model we have used and the parameter values In the model are consistent with the available experimental data (Insofar as consistency Is possible). It Is not possible to determine without additional data whether the difficulties at small x and at high temperature are attributable to Inadequacies In the model or Inadequacies In the available experimental data, which have been used to evaluate the model parameters. [Pg.137]

With the currently available information, the largest uncertainty is in the oxygen-potential model and the parameter values within the model. A recent assessment of the Pu/0 system (42) has indicated that the values of the parameters used in the Blackburn model yield slightly smaller oxygen potentials than those of Alexander (22), those of Tetenbaum (22-42) and those extrapolated from the data of Woodley (43). A reevaluation of the model parameters would allow a better fit to these experimental data ... [Pg.144]

As was the case with lanthanide crystal spectra (25), we found that a systematic analysis could be developed by examining differences, AP, between experimentally-established actinide parameter values and those computed using Hartree-Fock methods with the inclusion of relativistic corrections (24), as illustrated in Table IV for An3+. Crystal-field effects were approximated based on selected published results. By forming tabulations similar to Table IV for 2+, 4+, 5+ and 6+ spectra, to the extent that any experimental data were available to test the predictions, we found that the AP-values for Pu3+ provided a good starting point for approximating the structure of plutonium spectra in other valence states. However,... [Pg.189]

In semi-empirical methods, complicated integrals are set equal to parameters that provide the best fit to experimental data, such as enthalpies of formation. Semi-empirical methods are applicable to a wide range of molecules with a virtually limitless number of atoms, and are widely popular. The quality of results is very dependent on using a reasonable set of experimental parameters that have the same values across structures, and so this kind of calculation has been very successful in organic chemistry, where there are just a few different elements and molecular geometries. [Pg.700]

Our investigations agree with arguments in earlier articles by other authors, namely that empirical reactivity indices provide the best correlation with the goal values of the cationic polymerization (lg krel, DPn, molecular weight). On the other hand, the quantum chemical parameters are often based on such simplified models that quantitative correlations with experimental goal values remain unsatisfactory 84,85>. But HMO calculations for vinyl monomers show, that it is possible to determine intervals of values for quantum chemical parameters which reflect the anionic and cationic polymerizability 72,74) (see part 4.1.1) as well as grades of the reactivity (see part 3.2). [Pg.195]

During the subcooled nucleate flow boiling of a liquid in a channel the bulk temperature of the liquid at ONB, 7b, is less than the saturation temperature, and at a given value of heat flux the difference ATsub.oNB = 7s - 7b depends on L/d. The experimental parameters are presented in Table 6.2. [Pg.263]

The goal is to determine a functional form for (a, b,. .., T) that can be used to design reactors. The simplest case is to suppose that the reaction rate has been measured at various values a,b,..., T. A CSTR can be used for these measurements as discussed in Section 7.1.2. Suppose J data points have been measured. The jXh point in the data is denoted as S/t-data aj,bj,..., Tj) where Uj, bj,..., 7 are experimentally observed values. Corresponding to this measured reaction rate will be a predicted rate, modeii p bj,7 ). The predicted rate depends on the parameters of the model e.g., on k,m,n,r,s,... in Equation (7.4) and these parameters are chosen to obtain the best fit of the experimental... [Pg.210]

A general method has been developed for the estimation of model parameters from experimental observations when the model relating the parameters and input variables to the output responses is a Monte Carlo simulation. The method provides point estimates as well as joint probability regions of the parameters. In comparison to methods based on analytical models, this approach can prove to be more flexible and gives the investigator a more quantitative insight into the effects of parameter values on the model. The parameter estimation technique has been applied to three examples in polymer science, all of which concern sequence distributions in polymer chains. The first is the estimation of binary reactivity ratios for the terminal or Mayo-Lewis copolymerization model from both composition and sequence distribution data. Next a procedure for discriminating between the penultimate and the terminal copolymerization models on the basis of sequence distribution data is described. Finally, the estimation of a parameter required to model the epimerization of isotactic polystyrene is discussed. [Pg.282]

Fig. 1. a) Standard protonation enthalpy in secondary carbenium ion formation on H-(US)Y-zeolites with a varying Si/Al ratio, b) Effect of the average acid strength for a series of H-(US)Y zeolites experimental (symbols) versus calculated results based on the parameter values obtained in [11] (lines) for n-nonane conversion as a function of the space time at 506 K, 0.45 MPa, Hj/HC = 13.13 (Si/Al-ratios 2.6, 18, 60)... [Pg.55]

To find the relation between the values of R and measured experimentally in terms of the circuit of Fig. 12.11a and the parameter values in the circuit of Fig. 12.14a, we must first convert [with the aid of Eq. (12.23)] the parameters of the circuit with parallel elements Ry and Q into the parameters of a circuit with a resistance and capacitance in series, and to the value of resistance obtained we must add R.. As a result, we have... [Pg.211]


See other pages where Experimental parameter values is mentioned: [Pg.607]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.2564]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.2]   


SEARCH



Experimental parameters

Experimental value

Parameter value

© 2024 chempedia.info