Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evolved phases, kinetics

The availability of powerful computers and advanced computational methods to treat problems in chemistry opens the possibility for predicting rates of reactions. As explained earlier, equilibrium thermodynamics has provided a rigorous basis for the prediction of maximum conversion levels and the conditions under which they are achieved. The Arrhenius equation served as a tool for rationalizing rate constants in terms of activation energies and preexponentials. These parameters, however, could not be predicted on the basis of molecular properties of the reacting species until the concept of the transition state evolved, around 1935. Gas-phase kinetics in particular established a fundamental understanding of the Arrhenius parameters. We treat the transition-state theory in Chapter 4. [Pg.19]

As will be shown later, the phase separation begins at very low degrees of conversion and is enhanced by increasing MM and voliune fraction of copolymer. The kinetics of IPN formation determines the onset of phase separation and influences strongly this process as a whole, whereas phase separation does not influence the kinetic cmves. This fact may serve as an additional confirmation of the assumption that the phase separation proceeds according to a spinodal mechanism, because in this case the compositions of two evolving phases are very close. [Pg.40]

The increase in AH above zero in Fig. 15 is accompanied by an increase in q, that is, by an increase in the size of the boundary region where thermodynamic incompatibility is observed between two evolved phases. Thus, a strictly thermodynamic quantity indicates the emergence of the phase boundary regions. The quantity of interfacial boundary materials may be increased partially at the expense of the amount of polymer II present. It should be noted that the interphase region arises as a result of the incomplete phase separation. Thus, its volume fraction should also depend on the conditions of phase separation that are determined by the kinetics of chemical reaction. The faster is the reaction of the network formation, the smaller should be the fraction and the thickness of the interphase. [Pg.49]

The kinetic effects influence not only the onset of the phase separation but also the composition and the ratio of evolved phases as well. It was shown that it is possible to evaluate the ratio of phases and their composition from the shifts of glass transition temperatures of each phase with respect to the pure component prevailing in this phase. Because of this, the elucidation of the kinetics of the transitions in evolved phases is of great importance for im-derstanding of the interrelation between the reaction conditions and phase separation proceeding in the systems. [Pg.176]

The kinetics of the formation of these systems was studied [202] for the PU/PBMA IPNs. As distinct from the preceding results, in this work the phase separation resulting from kinetic changes was estimated by the glass transition temperatures of two evolved phases, which characterize their composition and hence the conditions of phase separation. Table 14 shows some parameters of semi-IPN PU/PBMA 85 15 mass % obtained by introduction of Hnear PBMA into the reaction mixtme. The main criterion of phase separation in this work is the shift of glass transition temperature of the two evolved phases, each of which is enriched by one of the components. [Pg.176]

The incomplete phase separation or phase separation due to the spinodal mechanism leads to the formation of a transition zone or an interphase between two evolved phases. This is that part of the system which for kinetic reasons stays in the unseparated state and preserves the structure of the reaction mixture before the onset of phase separation. [Pg.183]

The use of kinetic inhibitors and/or anti-agglomcrators in actual fieid operations is a new and evolving technology. These are various formulations of chemicals that can be used in a mixture of one or more kinetic inhibitors and/or anti-agglomerators. At the current time, to get an optimum mixture for a specific application it is necessary to set up a controlled bench test using the actual fluids to be inhibited and determine the resulting equilibrium phase line. As the mixture of chemicals is changed, a family of equilibrium phase lines will develop. This will result m an initial determination of a near optimum mixture of chemicals. [Pg.108]

Figure 5 Free energy surface at l l(Fig. 5a) [22, 24, 28] and 1 3 (Fig. 5b) [23, 24, 33] stoichiometries in the vicinity of disordered state ( f=0.0) at T—. 7Q and 1.6, respectively. The solid line in left-hand (right-hand) figure indicates the kinetic path evolving towards the L q LI2 ordered phase when the system is quenched from T—2.5 (3.0) down to 1.70 (1.60), while the broken lines are devolving towards disordered phase. The open arrows on the contour surface designate the direction of the decrease of free energy, and the arrows on the kinetic path indicate the direction of time evolution or devolution. Figure 5 Free energy surface at l l(Fig. 5a) [22, 24, 28] and 1 3 (Fig. 5b) [23, 24, 33] stoichiometries in the vicinity of disordered state ( f=0.0) at T—. 7Q and 1.6, respectively. The solid line in left-hand (right-hand) figure indicates the kinetic path evolving towards the L q LI2 ordered phase when the system is quenched from T—2.5 (3.0) down to 1.70 (1.60), while the broken lines are devolving towards disordered phase. The open arrows on the contour surface designate the direction of the decrease of free energy, and the arrows on the kinetic path indicate the direction of time evolution or devolution.
Various types of reactor configuration may be employed to effect non-catalytic gas—solid reactions. Events occurring during such reactions (see Sect. 5) are complex and industrial equipment for particular applications has evolved with operating experience rather than as a result of analytical design. Those factors which influence the course of the reaction are the reaction kinetics (as observed for a single particle), the size distribution of the solid reactant feed and the flow pattern of both solid and gas phases through the reactor. An excellent account of gas—solid reactions and... [Pg.198]

While many techniques have evolved to evaluate surface intermediates, as will be discussed below, it is equally important to also obtain information on gas phase intermediates, as well. While the surface reactions are interesting because they demonstrate heterogeneous kinetic mechanisms, it is the overall product yield that is finally obtained. As presented in a text by Dumesic et al. one must approach heterogeneous catalysis in the way it has been done for gas phase systems, which means using elementary reaction expressions to develop a detailed chemical kinetic mechanism (DCKM). DCKMs develop mechanisms in which only one bond is broken or formed at each step in the reaction scheme. The DCKM concept was promoted and used by numerous researchers to make great advances in the field of gas phase model predictions. [Pg.192]

The rate of phase separation after extraction in AOT-RMs is slow [167]. Keeping this in view, there is a need to study in detail the phase separation kinetics of this reverse micellar system in order to evolve means to enhance the phase separation rate. This is a very important aspect as far as industrial adaptability of RME is concerned, since the slower separation rate may become a bottleneck as in the case of ATPE. One possible approach to enhance phase separation is the application of external fields such as electric, acoustic, and microwave to reverse micellar systems. These are shown to enhance the phase separation rate in the case of ATPE [346-348]. Employing reverse micellar systems which phase separate quickly without the need for any external effort could also be a plausible solution. Some examples of such systems are DTDPA-RMs [237], sugar esters DK-F-110 RMs [239], and NaDEHP-RMs [167,243]. [Pg.175]


See other pages where Evolved phases, kinetics is mentioned: [Pg.254]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.934]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.336]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.176 ]




SEARCH



Evolvability

Phase kinetic

Reaction Kinetics and Properties of Evolved Phases

© 2024 chempedia.info