Evaluation terminology

Before selecting or sizing a specific control device, a careful evaluation of all aspects of the process and contaminants must be made. Improper terminology can lead to poor design and/or operation of any type of device. A list of contaminant definitions in accordance with the USA Standards Institute includes the following. 

This chapter describes the basic principles and procedures for the evaluation of overpressure potential in plant equipment, and for the selection, design and specification of appropriate pressure relieving facilities. The design of closed safety valves and flare headers is included in this chapter, but blowdown drums and flares are covered separately. To properly discuss this subject, the reader should become familiar with the following terminology. 

The process engineer needs to understand the terminology of the heat transfer equipment manufacturers in order to properly design, specify, evaluate bids, and check drawings for this equipment. 

This chapter adds the socio-economic dimension to the medical or technical perspectives of the proceeding contributions of this book. As its health economic terminology and approach might be unfamiliar to some readers, we start with a section on methodology. In particular, we present an overview of the concept of Cost-of-Illness (COI) and of relevant health economic evaluation techniques. In Sect. 2, we present the basic findings of a meta-analysis of the socio-economic costs of HIV/AIDS and of the socio-economic impact of antiviral intervention. The major findings are reflected in Sect. 3. The chapter closes with a speculation on long-term socio-economic costs of antiviral intervention. 

You may be surprised that for our example data from Miller and Miller ([2], p. 106), the correlation coefficient calculated using any of these methods of computation for the r-value is 0.99887956534852. When we evaluate the correlation computation we see that given a relatively equivalent prediction error represented as (X - X), J2 (X - X), or SEP, the standard deviation of the data set (X) determines the magnitude of the correlation coefficient. This is illustrated using Graphics 59-la and 59-lb. These graphics allow the correlation coefficient to be displayed for any specified Standard error of prediction, also occasionally denoted as the standard error of estimate (SEE). It should be obvious that for any statistical study one must compare the actual computational recipes used to make a calculation, rather than to rely on the more or less non-standard terminology and assume that the computations are what one expected. 

Excess acidity correlations have been used to show that some aromatic sulfonic acid desulfonations have an A-SE2 mechanism.188,189 This mechanism (alternative terminologies are Ad-E2 and A(E) +A(N))190 has also been found to apply to the hydration of acetylene itself,191 to ynamines192 and to many other alkynes,193-195 as well as to many different alkenes196-199 and vinyl ethers.200-203 The excess acidity method has been used to evaluate aA values for several alkene hydrations.204 205... 

The terminology used varies considerably. Hazard identification and risk assessment are sometimes combined into a general category called hazard evaluation. Risk assessment is sometimes called hazard analysis. A risk assessment procedure that determines probabilities is frequently called probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), whereas a procedure that determines probability and consequences is called quantitative risk analysis (QRA). 

The terminology involved in screen design and evaluation and the characteristics of a screen should be clearly stated and understood. The characteristics of screen performance are defined as... 

Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, Position paper on terminology in pharmacogenetics, The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, London, 2002. (Available at http //www.emea.eu.int)... 

Figure 19.1 gives an overview of some of the most common membrane separation techniques, their application range and their denotation. It should be pointed out that the terminology for membrane separation processes is partly traditional. The kind of membrane-solute interactions and the respective mass-transport phenomena can therefore not necessarily be derived from the designation of the membrane separation, and should always be evaluated for the individual application envisaged. 

The literature gives a wide range of practical guidelines for the evaluation of method performance characteristics [58]. Besides the diversity of approaches, also the terminology and way of reporting results vary widely. Differences may occur depending on the purpose and the application field of the method, and validation studies may become more difficult as the complexity of the analysis increases [86]. In what follows, terms and formulas are taken from the accepted IUPAC nomenclature for the presentation of results of chemical analysis [66]. For each validation parameter, definitions, ways of expression, determination guidehnes, and acceptance criteria are reported in Table 5. 

Although a scannable or keyword-based resume can follow any of the formats of a traditional printed resume, the wording will be different. After the heading section, some applicants add a section called "Keywords," which is simply a listing of nouns, phrases, industry terminology, and buzzwords you know the computer will search for when it evaluates your resume. 

There are some conventions and terminology that are common to all statistical data evaluation approaches. As the first step the input matrix X is organized such that the independent variables (compositions) are arranged in rows from 1 to t and the preprocessed signals from sensors 1 to m are entered in the columns. 

---