Ethyl bromide calculation

Calculate activation barriers for bromide addition t( methyl bromide, ethyl bromide, 2-propyl bromide an( 2-methyl-2-propyl bromide using energies for Sn transition states bromide+methyI bromide, bromide- ethyl bromide, bromide+2-propyl bromide and bromides 2-methyl-2-propyl bromide) and Br (at left). Whicl reaction is fastest Slowest ... 

How much ethanol can be made from 50 grams of ethyl bromide What assumptions do you make in this calculation ... 

There are many possible sources of error in the calculation of equilibrium from dipole moments. It is difficult to calculate accurately the moments of model compounds. As has been pointed out,124 the carbon skeleton itself contributes to the moment, as shown by the different dipole moments of ethyl bromide (2.069 D) and n-hexyl bromide (2.156 D) and of axial and equatorial fluorocyclohexane (1.81 D and 2.11 D, respectively). For nonsym-metrical molecules in general, the estimation of the precise direction of a dipole moment is subject to considerable error. 

Different Methods of Calculating k for the Decomposition of Ethyl Bromide ifeXlO4 sec-1 at 305°... 

Quantitative Calculations. These attempts to connect physical and chemical properties with models are helpful to chemists and, in the hands of organic chemists, molecular models have led to marvelous advances, but physicists are inclined to object to them because they are inadequate in more quantitative fields. We were rather pleased with the assignment of definite bands in the spectrum of ethyl bromide to corresponding bonds in the molecule and... 

Speaking specifically of ethyl bromide, the energy of activation calculated from the temperature coefficient of the thermal dis-... 

It should be noted that the heats of formation of CBr4, CH2Br2, and CHBr3 given by the N.B.S. are calculated . Methyl bromide has been burned by Thomsen 523 but in view of the difficulties attending the combustion of halogen-containing compounds we prefer to deduce E Ca Br) from ethyl bromide, the heat of formation of which has been obtained by equilibrium methods in... 

According to Schulze Cpjcp is always greater than, but sometimes nearly equal to, unity the highest value he found was 1-87 for ethyl bromide. The difference of sp. hts. can be calculated by Thomson s formula ( 47.11) ... 

The reaction between ethylene and hydrogen bromide to form ethyl bromide is carried out in a continuous reactor. The product stream is analyzed and found to contain 51.7 mole% C2HsBr and 17.3% HBr. The feed to the reactor contains only ethylene and hydrogen bromide. Calculate the fractional conversion of the limiting reactant and the percentage by which the other reactant is in excess. If the molar flow rate of the feed stream is 165 mol/s, what is the extent of reaction (Give its numerical value and its units.)... 

Problem 14.7 In 80% ethanol at SS", the second-order rate constant for the reaction of ethyl bromide with hydroxide ion is 0.0017 liters/mole/sec. Making use of this rate constant and those in Sec. 14.8 and Problem 14.4, calculate the relative rates of hydrolysis in 0.1 N hydroxide for methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, and rerr-butyl bromides. 

A mixture of 1 mole of ethyl bromide and 2 moles of ethyl iodide, which behaves ideally, is evaporated into a closed space at 40 C, when the vapor pressures of the pure components are 802 and 252 mm., respectively. Calculate the total pressure at the beginning and end of the process. (Note that at the end of the vaporization the composition of the vapor will be identical with that of the initial liauid.)... 

Phenyl radicals have been estimated102 by reacting the sample with anhydrous aluminium chloride followed by the addition of ethyl bromide, and reflux for 2 h. The hexaethylbenzene formed is extracted with diethyl ether, washed, and then ether and ethyl bromide are distilled off. The residue is dried over phosphorus pentoxide and weighed. The phenyl radical content can then be calculated using an empirical coefficient of ethylation of 0.91. 

This equation is readily tested where products from both Si and S2 can be measured. The total yields of CH3 and C2H5 radicals formed from solutions of methyl bromide + ethyl bromide and methyl chloride + ethyl bromide (69) are shown in the next to the last columns of Tables V and VI. These totals agree well with the values given in the last column, calculated using Equation IX and a8 values derived from the single solute systems. 

Since all parameters required for evaluating these equations are available for mixed alkyl halide systems from measurements on the individual solutes, the validity of the equations can be critically tested. The individual CH3 and C2H5 yields expected from methyl bromide-ethyl bromide mixtures calculated on this basis are given in Table V. The agreement is reasonable with however the ethyl yields being slightly greater and the... 

We now return to the data on the methyl chloride-ethyl bromide system (69) and the first of the problems implicating secondary reactions of negative ions. In this system the total yield is predicted well by Equation IX using 8 values from the single solute systems. The individual methyl and ethyl radical yields, however, deviate considerably from the calculated values (bracketed values in Table VI) and are well outside the possible limits of the reactivity values and possible experimental errors. The ethyl radical yields are generally much greater and the methyl radical yields much less than the calculated values. In particular, the ratios of the quantity 5 / 2 are considerably... 

The interaction term is in brackets, and for this case is independent of [Si]. In the methyl chloride-ethyl bromide system such an independence is found—e.g., for the four runs at ethyl bromide concentration of 0.1M, ratios observed for G(P)S2obs/G(P)s2caic (— /([Si],[S2] )exp) are 0.74, 0.76, 0.67, and 0.72. From a ratio of 0.72 at 0.1 Af C2HsBr, ft is evaluated as 1.51 (assuming of course the form of /( [Si],[S2] )). From this the individual yields may be calculated for the other experiments and are the unbracketed values in Table VI. The available data are well described by Equation XX. Using Equation XX and an analogous expression for G (Q)Sl one can show that where electron transfer occurs from... 

In the first step the diethyl ester of malonic acid is treated with ethyl bromide in the presence of sodium ethoxide when one of the active hydrogen atoms in the former gets eliminated with bromine atom in the later as a molecule of hydrobromic acid resulting into the formation of the corresponding diethyl ester of ethyl malonic acid. This on subsequent addition of 2-monobromopentane and in the presence of sodium ethoxide gives rise to diethyl ether of ethyl-(l-methyl butyl) malonate with the elimination of one molecule of hydrobromic acid. Urea is made to condense with the product obtained from the previous step when pentobarbital is formed with the elimination of two moles of ethanol. Finally, the pentobarbital is treated with a calculated amoimt of sodium hydroxide when the required official compoimd is formed. 

Saunders and co-workers (Amin et al., 1990) used E2 elimination reactions in the p-substituted 2-phenylethyl system to test the new criteria for tunnelling suggested by the above calculations. The actual substrates and base/solvent systems they used were (2-phenylethyl-2-f)-trimethylammonium bromide, [19], with sodium ethoxide in ethanol, 2-phenylethyl-2-f bromide, [20], with potassium t-butoxide in t-butyl alcohol and 2-(p-chlorophenyl)ethyl-2-f tosylate, [21], with potassium t-butoxide in t-butyl alcohol. When equation (57) was applied to the experimental secondary (kB/ S) KIEs in Table 39, the calculated /th h KIEs were 1.106 0.033 and 1.092 0.026 for [19] and [21],... 

Materials. CEVE and 4-nitrophenyl vinyl ether (VNP) were synthesized and purified as reported earlier (12,13), respectively. 2-(4-Nitrophenoxy)ethyl vinyl ether (NPVE) (m.p. 72-73°C) was prepared by reacting of potassium 4-nitrophenoxide (PNP) (142 g 0.8 mol) and CVE (842 g 7.9 mol) using tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (TBAB) (4.0 g 12 mmol) as a phase transfer catalyst at the boiling temperature of CVE for 12 h. The potassium chloride produced was filtered off, the filtrate washed with water, excess CVE evaporated, and then the crude product was recrystallized twice from n-hexane. (Yield 61.7%. IR (KBr) 1630 (C=C), 1520 (-N02), and 1340 cm-1 (-N02).) Elemental analysis on the product provided the following data Calculated for C10HnNO4 C, 57.40%, H, 5.30%, N, 6.69%. Found C, 57.49%, H, 5.3%, N, 6.72%. 

---