Errors standardization

Manganese, determination by x-ray emission spectrography, 328 in domestic ores, 200, 202, 203 trace analysis by x-ray emission spectrography, 228, 229, 231, 232 Manipulative errors, standard counting error comparable with, 285-287 Mass absorption coefficient, additivity, 15... 

They include simple statistics (e.g., sums, means, standard deviations, coefficient of variation), error analysis terms (e.g., average error, relative error, standard error of estimate), linear regression analysis, and correlation coefficients. 

A one standard error rule is described in Hastie et al. (Hastie et al. 2001). It is assumed that several values for the measure of the prediction error at each considered model complexity are available (this can be achieved, e.g., by CV or by bootstrap, Sections 4.2.5 and 4.2.6). Mean and standard error (standard deviation of the means, s) for each model complexity are computed, and the most parsimonious model whose mean prediction error is no more than one standard error above the minimum mean prediction error is chosen. Figure 4.4 (right) illustrates this procedure. The points are the mean prediction errors and the arrows indicate mean plus/minus one standard error. 

Independent Variable Coefficient Standard Error Standardized Regression Coefficient... 

The same precision as discussed above can be extended about 50 mass units by using N2 (molecular weight 28) and perfluoropropane (molecular weight 188) compared with C02 and SF6. For example, with a standard deviation in K of 0.5, a mass error standard deviation of 1 mass unit would be 300 instead of 250. Since the measurement of detector response is a function of the recorder (peak heights), integrator system (for areas), columns (absorption sites), electronics, temperature, etc., the overall precision of molecular weight measurement should be further improved in the future. 

In experiments in which mean values are compared, the number of observations that should be made depends, as might be expected, on the quantities o-the experimental error standard deviation ... 

Unfortunately, in a large portion of our research, differences in response values for various trials of a design of experiments amount to for example, 1-3%, and the trial error standard deviation amounts to 5%. Experimental research in such cases makes no sense. 

A Bayesian analysis proceeds by placing prior distributions on the regression coefficient vector (3, error standard deviation a, and subset indicator vector 6. One form of prior distribution is given in detail below and other approaches are then discussed. Techniques for choosing hyperparameters of prior distributions, such as the mean of a prior distribution, are discussed later in Section 4. 

Our estimate would now have an error variance of ((1.09+ 0.00 + 1.85)/2 + 0.83) = 2.30 or a standard deviation of 1.52. Or if we took four samples from four vats and blended them and carried out one analysis upon the blended sample our estimate would have an error variance of ((1-09 + 0.00 + 1.85)/4 + 0.83) = 1.56 or a standard deviation of 1.25. Thus with a little extra trouble in sampling, and no more work on the part of the laboratory, we have got an estimate of the batch mean quality with an error standard deviation of 1.25, to be compared with the simple estimate from one sample of 1.94. 

Mean one standard error. Standard deviation on the distribution. Number of sites. Area-weighted average value, the compilation by Nyblade and Pollack (1993) excluding the more recent measurements included here. 

Figure 14-27 Scatter plots illustrating the effect of the range on the value of the correlation coefficient p. A, The target values are uniformly distributed over the range I to 3 with random errors of both xl and x2 corresponding to an SD of 5% of the target value at 3 (constant error standard deviations).

Power in Case of Constant Error Standard Deviations Table 14-13 covers intervals with ratios from 1.25 to 10 for the maximum value divided by the minimum value (range ratio = maximum value/minimum value). The other entry in the table is the standardized delta value for slope or intercept. As regards the slope, this value refers to the slope deviation from unity measured in analytical coefficient of variation units ... 

Necessary sample sizes for test of slope deviation from I or intercept deviation from zero by Deming i cgression analysis given constant error standard deviations SD i --- SD..2 — SD. Uniform xl and x2 distributions on intervals with the given range ratio.The range ratio is the maximum value divided by the minimum value of the considered interval. 

Power in Case of Proportional Error Standard Deviations... 

Assume that you have run experiments by a factorial design (with Np runs) with a view to assessing the significance of the experimental variables fi om estimates, hj, of the coefficients in a linear response surface model. Assume also that you have made Nq repeated runs of one experiment to obtain an estimate of the experimental error standard deviation. From the average response, J, in repeated runs, an estimate of the experimental error standard deviation, Sq, with (Nq - 1) degrees of freedom is obtained as... 

The standard error, s, of the estimated coefficient is then obtained by dividing the experimental error standard deviation by VNp, see Chapter 3. 

Notice that appropriately adjusting for lO variability in the NLME model not only reduced the bias in the estimate of the dose proportionality parameter but also led to a valid estimate of the residual error standard deviation, a value much closer to that used to simulate the data, 0.1. 

Several approaches to quantifying dependent variable predictability have been proposed. The metric should be chosen because of its usefulness and one should be careful not to violate any of the underlying assumptions of the approach. There are instances when one of several metrics could be applied. The use of graphical displays, prediction error, standardized prediction error, and prediction through parameters have been summarized elsewhere and will not be addressed directly here (1, 28). A method proposed by Kleijnen (6) will be reviewed herein. 

The squared root of the residual mean square is called residual standard deviation, RSD or standard error of estimate, SB or s (or error standard deviation, or residual standard error). It is an estimate of the model error a, defined as... 

Any correlation developed for J will thus automatically result in a much better correlation for K when the same 4.2Nsp values are added to both the J values calculated by group contributions and the J values estimated from the fitting procedure. The final correlation for K will thus have the same standard deviation as the correlation for J, but a much smaller relative error [(standard deviation)/(average value) ratio] and a much larger correlation coefficient. 

The default method for all first-order methods used both the gradient and Hessian matrix in the estimation of the standard errors. Standard errors were also calculated using only the gradient (Matrix = S) or only the Hessian (Matrix = R). The results are presented in Table 7.5 and Table 7.6. 

---