Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equilibrium region

We will begin our discussion by describing (vapor + liquid) equilibrium, which we will extend into the supercritical fluid region as (fluid + fluid) equilibrium. (Liquid + liquid) equilibrium will then be described and combined with (vapor + liquid) equilibrium in the (fluid + fluid) equilibrium region. Finally, we will describe some examples of (solid + liquid) equilibrium. [Pg.406]

This distance is far beyond the equilibrium region of primary chemical interest, so we do not consider the long-range-hopping process further. [Pg.60]

Although the spectroscopic cr2s, cr2p,... labels are asymptotically accurate as R —oo, these labels are seriously misleading in the near-equilibrium region. In N2, for example, the bonding molecular orbital (3) that most nearly corresponds... [Pg.159]

As R diminishes into the near-equilibrium region, Principles I—III dictate that the atomic NHO occupancy patterns will be promoted to more favorable bonding... [Pg.166]

Figures 7 and 8 plot deviations of total energies from FCI results for the various methods. It is clear that the CASSCF/L-CTD theory performs best out of all the methods smdied. (We recall that although the canonical transformation operator exp A does not explicitly include single excitations, the main effects are already included via the orbital relaxation in the CASSCF reference.) The absolute error of the CASSCF/L-CTD theory at equilibrium—1.57 mS (6-31G), 2.26 m j (cc-pVDZ)—is slightly better than that of CCSD theory—1.66m j (6-31G), 3.84 m j (cc-pVDZ) but unlike for the CCSD and CCSDT theories, the CASSCF/L-CTD error stays quite constant as the molecule is pulled apart while the CC theories exhibit a nonphysical turnover and a qualitatively incorrect dissociation curve. The largest error for the CASSCF/L-CTD method occurs at the intermediate bond distance of 1.8/ with an error of —2.34m (6-3IG), —2.42 mE j (cc-pVDZ). Although the MRMP curve is qualitatively correct, it is not quantitatively correct especially in the equilibrium region, with an error of 6.79 mEfi (6-3IG), 14.78 mEk (cc-pVDZ). One measure of the quality of a dissociation curve is the nonparallelity error (NPE), the absolute difference between the maximum and minimum deviations from the FCI energy. For MRMP the NPE is 4mE (6-3IG), 9mE, (cc-pVDZ), whereas for CASSCF/ L-CTD the NPE is 5 mE , (6-3IG), 6 mE , (cc-pVDZ), showing that the CASSCF/L-CTD provides a quantitative description of the bond breaking with a nonparallelity error competitive with that of MRMP. Figures 7 and 8 plot deviations of total energies from FCI results for the various methods. It is clear that the CASSCF/L-CTD theory performs best out of all the methods smdied. (We recall that although the canonical transformation operator exp A does not explicitly include single excitations, the main effects are already included via the orbital relaxation in the CASSCF reference.) The absolute error of the CASSCF/L-CTD theory at equilibrium—1.57 mS (6-31G), 2.26 m j (cc-pVDZ)—is slightly better than that of CCSD theory—1.66m j (6-31G), 3.84 m j (cc-pVDZ) but unlike for the CCSD and CCSDT theories, the CASSCF/L-CTD error stays quite constant as the molecule is pulled apart while the CC theories exhibit a nonphysical turnover and a qualitatively incorrect dissociation curve. The largest error for the CASSCF/L-CTD method occurs at the intermediate bond distance of 1.8/ with an error of —2.34m (6-3IG), —2.42 mE j (cc-pVDZ). Although the MRMP curve is qualitatively correct, it is not quantitatively correct especially in the equilibrium region, with an error of 6.79 mEfi (6-3IG), 14.78 mEk (cc-pVDZ). One measure of the quality of a dissociation curve is the nonparallelity error (NPE), the absolute difference between the maximum and minimum deviations from the FCI energy. For MRMP the NPE is 4mE (6-3IG), 9mE, (cc-pVDZ), whereas for CASSCF/ L-CTD the NPE is 5 mE , (6-3IG), 6 mE , (cc-pVDZ), showing that the CASSCF/L-CTD provides a quantitative description of the bond breaking with a nonparallelity error competitive with that of MRMP.
These solutions have been examined in sedimentation velocity runs on the analytical ultracentrifuge (31). Beyond 0.5 base equivalent per mole of iron a fairly narrow sedimentation peak developed. The sedimentation coefficient, 7 1 S, was essentially constant up to 2.5 base equivalents per mole of iron, although the area under the peak increased with increasing degree of hydrolysis. Apparently, then, hydrolysis of ferric nitrate beyond the reversible equilibrium region produces increasing amounts of a fairly discrete high polymer whose size is constant. [Pg.123]

The parameter La is also called the separation factor and provides a quantitative description of the equilibrium regions La = 0 for irreversible, La< 1 for favorable, La = 1 for lineal-, and La > 1 for unfavorable adsorption. The same holds for Fr in Freundlich s isotherm. [Pg.269]

Finally, note that the LE/G equilibrium region disappears above a certain temperature that is the two-dimensional equivalent of the critical temperature for liquid-vapor equilibrium (see Fig. 7.8). [Pg.316]

What is the physical nature of the entropic factor It is useful to think of thermal effects as an agitating factor, leading to characteristic fluctuations Ax from equilibrium position xeq in a potential energy function O(x). The entropic factor describes how well the near-equilibrium region can accommodate these thermal fluctuations without significant energy penalty. [Pg.177]

The temperature requirement should also be considered. Region C must be at a uniform, known temperature, Tc. This follows from the requirement for equilibrium. Region A should... [Pg.38]

Fractional distillation can be represented on a liquid/vapor phase diagram by plotting temperature versus composition, as shown in Figure 11.18. The lower region of the diagram represents the liquid phase, and the upper region represents the vapor phase. Between the two is a thin equilibrium region where liquid and vapor coexist. [Pg.458]

The statistical thermodynamic method discussed here provides a bridge between the molecular crystal structures of Chapter 2 and the macroscopic thermodynamic properties of Chapter 4. It also affords a comprehensive means of correlation and prediction of all of the hydrate equilibrium regions of the phase diagram, without separate prediction schemes for two-, three-, and four-phase regions, inhibition, and so forth as in Chapter 4. However, for a qualitative understanding of trends and an approximation (or a check) of prediction schemes in this chapter, the previous chapter is a valuable tool. [Pg.257]

A Quadruple Point Figure 14.20 shows phase diagrams for (water + acetonitrile) at five different pressures.16 The diagram in (a) at / = 0.1 MPa for this system is very similar to the (cyclohexane + methanol) diagram shown in Figure 14.19a that we described earlier, with a (liquid-I-liquid) equilibrium region present above the (solid + liquid) equilibrium curve for water. [Pg.140]

At p = 140 MPa (Figure 14.20d) the (liquid + liquid) equilibrium region has moved to the acetonitrile side of the eutectic. Increasing the pressure further decreases the (liquid + liquid) region, until at p= 175 MPa (Figure 14.20e), the (liquid + liquid) region has disappeared under a (solid + liquid) curve that shows significant positive deviations from ideal solution behavior. [Pg.142]

The analyses described above can be applied directly to the equilibrium region of a lifetime spectrum. However, in atomic gases, where slowing down below the positronium formation threshold is by elastic collisions only, the positron speed distribution y(v, t) varies relatively slowly with time. Consequently the annihilation rate also varies slowly with time. From Figures 6.5(a) and (b) the existence of a non-exponential, or so-called shoulder, region close to t = 0 is evident, and the analysis of this region must be treated separately, as outlined below. Further details of the shape and length of the shoulder can be found in subsection 6.3.1 below. [Pg.276]

Fig. 1.11. (cont.) The Si and S2 potential energy surfaces have been calculated by Nonella and Huber (1986) and Suter, Briihlmann, and Huber (1990), respectively, whereas the PES for the So state is approximated by the sum of two uncoupled Morse oscillators. The shaded circles indicate the equilibrium region of the ground electronic state where the dissociative motion in the excited electronic states starts and the heavy arrows illustrate the subsequent dissociation paths. Detailed discussions of the absorption spectra and the vibrational state distributions of NO follow in Chapters 7 and 9. [Pg.23]

Now, consider the velocities and temperatures in two equilibrium regions, one in front of the shock and the other far behind the shock. Applying Eq. (6.83) and Eq. (6.85) to these two regions yields... [Pg.267]

Experimental results are presented for high pressure phase equilibria in the binary systems carbon dioxide - acetone and carbon dioxide - ethanol and the ternary system carbon dioxide - acetone - water at 313 and 333 K and pressures between 20 and 150 bar. A high pressure optical cell with external recirculation and sampling of all phases was used for the experimental measurements. The ternary system exhibits an extensive three-phase equilibrium region with an upper and lower critical solution pressure at both temperatures. A modified cubic equation of a state with a non-quadratic mixing rule was successfully used to model the experimental data. The phase equilibrium behavior of the system is favorable for extraction of acetone from dilute aqueous solutions using supercritical carbon dioxide. [Pg.115]

In their study of the decomposition of nitromethane, Rice and Thompson [94] introduced a new approach for constructing potential energy surfaces for many-atoms systems that react via multiple pathways. The basic idea of the approach is to construct potentials that accurately describe the various equilibrium regions, e.g., reactants and products, and then write the overall global potential as Vtotal=E SjV where j denotes the various stable species, the Vi are the analytical potentials for those species, and the Sj are weighting functions that effect a switching between the potentials... [Pg.143]

The phase behaviour of systems with 1-propanol and isopropanol is designated by pattern II. It is more complicated. The most striking additional feature is the formation of a second three phase equilibrium region which leads to four-phase equilibria. [Pg.244]


See other pages where Equilibrium region is mentioned: [Pg.76]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.242]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.395 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info