Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ensemble simple models

Let us consider a simple model of a quenched-annealed system which consists of particles belonging to two species species 0 is quenched (matrix) and species 1 is annealed, i.e., the particles are allowed to equlibrate between themselves in the presence of 0 particles. We assume that the subsystem composed of 0 particles has been a usual fluid before quenching. One can characterize it either by the density or by the value of the chemical potential The interparticle interaction Woo(r) does not need to be specified for the moment. It is just assumed that the fluid with interaction woo(r) has reached an equlibrium at certain temperature Tq, and then the fluid has been quenched at this temperature without structural relaxation. Thus, the distribution of species 0 is any one from a set of equihbrium configurations corresponding to canonical or grand canonical ensemble. We denote the interactions between annealed particles by Un r), and the cross fluid-matrix interactions by Wio(r). [Pg.297]

In terms of the generalized parameter matrices, the Jacobian is given as product of a simple matrix multiplication. Using explicit kinetic parameters, the estimation of the Jacobian can be tedious and computationally demanding, prohibiting the analysis of large ensembles of models. [Pg.197]

Since the simple and attractive hypothesis of RBT in alloys has failed to stand the test of time, the geometric or ensemble-size model became very helpful to interpret the behavior of alloys. When applied to alloys between an active component A and an inactive one B, the ensemble-size model in its simplest form reflects the dilution in ensembles of smaller size of the active surface A by B these smaller ensembles of A are less prone to activate the reactant(s). The immediate consequence of this phenomenon is a sharp decrease of the TOP. Obviously, the fall of TOP should be all the more so if preferential segregation to the surface of the inactive component B occurs. In the classical treatment of diluting an inflnite surface A by B, the probability to find an ensemble of neighboring n A atoms is given by [5,30,31]... [Pg.868]

We consider the Brownian motion when the assumption that the ensemble of Brownian particles is instantaneously thermalized is abandoned, in terms of simple models. [Pg.267]

To introduce the basic concepts of percolation theory [1-3], let us consider the very simple model of a two-dimensional square lattice as illustrated in Figure 5.1 [11,12]. In this system, we assume a probability, p, that a lattice site is occupied and we denote the occupied sites by closed circles. In the present lattice case, two sites are considered connected only if they are nearest neighbors and if they are both occupied. We define a (connected) cluster as an ensemble of occupied sites such that each of them is connected to at least another occupied site of the ensemble. In... [Pg.146]

The second step, prediction of the properties of a large ensemble of molecules based on simplified pair potentials, belongs to the realm of statistical physics. Liquids are particularly difficult to treat simplifications as in solids due to symmetry or in gases due to dilution are not possible. Although the theory of liquids has advanced considerably and for simple atomic liquids with simple model potentials accurate results can be obtained, there is little hope that anal3rtical theories will be successful for complex molecular liquids with arbitrary interactions. [Pg.477]

The JRF ASP set was derived from NMR studies of low energy solvated configurations of 13 tetrapeptides [67]. This represents an important difference from other derivations because actual peptides, rather than simple model compounds, were used to develop the JRF parameters. An ensemble of low-energy stractures for these tetrapeptides was also produced using the ECEPP/2... [Pg.294]

Exponential growth A simple model in which the ensemble average of s grows exponentially with time, represented by the growth process. [Pg.296]

When internal motion is present, the ensemble averaging in equation (2) becomes more complicated. There are a variety of ways in which these motions can be described here 1 will outline a simple model, in which the spins are assumed to undergo instantaneous jumps between discrete conformations. Many aspects of real motion can be usefully described in this way. For example, the motion of methyl protons about their symmetry axis approximates jumps between three equivalent positions many other side chain motions can also be conveniently modeled as jumps between allowed rotamers or ring puckers. Even small amplitude motions that might not ordinarily be considered as jumps can often be usefully approximated by transitions between points that sample the endpoints of allowed motion. [Pg.1868]

Another simple model [77] has been put forth to explain the possible mechanism with specific attention to (Ga,Mn)As. In this model, holes are assumed to hop only between Mn acceptor sites, where they interact with the Mn moments via phenomenological exchange interactions. In some other models [27], the ferromagnetic correlation mediated by holes originating from shallow acceptors in the ensemble of localized spins and a concentration of free holes (w3.5 x 10 /cm ) have been assumed for (Ga,Mn)As. [Pg.310]

Numerous QSAR tools have been developed [152, 154] and used in modeling physicochemical data. These vary from simple linear to more complex nonlinear models, as well as classification models. A popular approach more recently became the construction of consensus or ensemble models ( combinatorial QSAR ) combining the predictions of several individual approaches [155]. Or, alternatively, models can be built by rurming the same approach, such as a neural network of a decision tree, many times and combining the output into a single prediction. [Pg.42]

The lattice gas has been used as a model for a variety of physical and chemical systems. Its application to simple mixtures is routinely treated in textbooks on statistical mechanics, so it is natural to use it as a starting point for the modeling of liquid-liquid interfaces. In the simplest case the system contains two kinds of solvent particles that occupy positions on a lattice, and with an appropriate choice of the interaction parameters it separates into two phases. This simple version is mainly of didactical value [1], since molecular dynamics allows the study of much more realistic models of the interface between two pure liquids [2,3]. However, even with the fastest computers available today, molecular dynamics is limited to comparatively small ensembles, too small to contain more than a few ions, so that the space-charge regions cannot be included. In contrast, Monte Carlo simulations for the lattice gas can be performed with 10 to 10 particles, so that modeling of the space charge poses no problem. In addition, analytical methods such as the quasichemical approximation allow the treatment of infinite ensembles. [Pg.165]

This simple three-state model of protein folding, shown schematically in Figure 7, ascribes a separate force to shaping the structure of each state. Local steric interactions trap the protein chain in a large ensemble of conformations with the correct topology hydrophobic interactions drive the chain to a smaller, more compact subset of conformations then dispersion forces supply the enthalpy loss required to achieve a relatively fixed and rigid ensemble of native conformations. [Pg.44]

The calculated cross-sectional area of a molecule (Aocaic) based on the internal amphiphilic gradient of a molecule has been used as the basis for a novel BBB model [40]. For each molecule, a conformational ensemble was generated and the smallest ADca c was chosen. A simple bi-plot of log D7A vs. ADcaic was sufficient to correctly predict the BBB penetration of 85.2% of 122 drugs. [Pg.457]


See other pages where Ensemble simple models is mentioned: [Pg.296]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.767]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.1514]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.238]   


SEARCH



Ensemble modeling

Simple model

© 2024 chempedia.info