Trade secrets enforcement

However, in some cases, trade secret protection may constitute a competitive advantage by sustaining marketplace confidentiality [14], If the technical details of an innovation remain secret, it is often difficult for competitors to recreate a product, invent around it, or improve on it, especially if the innovation is complex. These latter types of activities are commonly known as competitor piggy-backing. If adequate confidentiality measures are put in place and enforced, trade secret can be an effective method of protecting information from the public and securing a market sector monopoly [15]. 

The focus on the claimed invention is sensible from both policy and practical enforcement standpoints. It is not fair to grant a right to exclude that is greater than the scope of disclosure, but it s also not fair to require disclosure beyond the granted right of exclusion. If the patent claims only a composition then it is usually not necessary to describe the best way to make the compound the process to make the compound might even be the subject of a separate patent application or kept as the applicant s trade secret. In such a circumstance, the patent would need only to disclose those details that materially affected the invention as claimed. This issue will be specifically covered in our next case. 

Some information is vitally important in the operation of a business, but either it cannot be patented, or if patented the patent would be difficult to enforce. Such information is held as a trade secret. Catalyst preparation techniques are good examples of proprietary information that a company may choose not to patent. 

Contracts of employment normally contain a clause stating that when a person leaves the employ of that company and is recruited by or works with a competitor then that person will not divulge any trade secrets to the competitor. This is enforceable by law in a many countries. 

Trade secrets are created and maintained by enforcing secrecy, either by employment agreements or policies or by confidential disclosure agreements. Trade secrets are extinguished by disclosures that are inconsistent with maintaining the secrecy of the information. Violation and extinguishment of a trade secret most often occur when one who is under an obligation to the owner to maintain the secret makes an unauthorized disclosure of the secret. The information in a... 

Currently, the protection afforded trade secrets in Mexico is relatively limited and weak. The situation is likely to change because of the recent adoption of NAFTA. NAFTA, covering the United States, Canada, and Mexico, requires each country, at a minimum, to provide "adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, specifically including trade secret rights. The actual effect of NAFTA must, of course, await its actual implementation in the member countries. 

This book provides and overview of SARA Title III compliance requirements. Notification and reporting requirements, enforcement and penalties, trade secret protection provisions, and other aspects of the law are detailed. 

Trade Secrets A trade secret is confidential information that provides a company with a business advantage. Trade secrets may include formulas, compilations, patterns, methods, techniques, and other similarly valuable business information. A company that does not demonstrate sufficient effort to maintain the confiden-tialty of its trade secrets risks losing them, and the ability to enforce them. 

If a citation for a failure to release trade secret information is contested by the chemical manufacturer, importer, or employer, the matter will be adjudicated before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission in accordance with the Act s enforcement scheme and the applicable Commission rules of procedure. In accordance with the Commission rules, when a chemical manufacturer, importer, or employer continues to withhold the information during the contest, the Administrative Law Judge may review the citation and supporting... 

Even though the formation of the contract meets all the requirements it may still be declared to be an illegal contract and unenforceable. This is a complex topic but one example can be taken from the contract of employment. There are often restraint clauses in such contracts whereby an employer seeks to prevent an employee who leaves the firm from working for a rival company or setting himself up in competition. Such restraints are basically imenforceable because they are not in the public interest and are contrary to the employee s freedom to work. However, it is possible to enforce such a restraint if the employer can show that the wording of the clause was reasonable in scope and that he has some interests, such as trade secrets or customer lists, that need protecting Fitch v. Dewes ). What the employer cannot do, however, is to seek to prevent competition that the ex-employee may threaten. 

Regulatory SARA Title III 311 Hazard Category Acute, Chronic CASafe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act Prop. 65 NJ Trade Secret Reg. Num. 800963-5012... 

---