Energy transfer relaxation time

This is no longer the case when (iii) motion along the reaction patir occurs on a time scale comparable to other relaxation times of the solute or the solvent, i.e. the system is partially non-relaxed. In this situation dynamic effects have to be taken into account explicitly, such as solvent-assisted intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) in the solute, solvent-induced electronic surface hopping, dephasing, solute-solvent energy transfer, dynamic caging, rotational relaxation, or solvent dielectric and momentum relaxation. 

The dynamics of fast processes such as electron and energy transfers and vibrational and electronic deexcitations can be probed by using short-pulsed lasers. The experimental developments that have made possible the direct probing of molecular dissociation steps and other ultrafast processes in real time (in the femtosecond time range) have, in a few cases, been extended to the study of surface phenomena. For instance, two-photon photoemission has been used to study the dynamics of electrons at interfaces [ ]. Vibrational relaxation times have also been measured for a number of modes such as the 0-Fl stretching m silica and the C-0 stretching in carbon monoxide adsorbed on transition metals [ ]. Pump-probe laser experiments such as these are difficult, but the field is still in its infancy, and much is expected in this direction m the near fiitiire. 

Kr. In the B-emitting states, a slower stepwise relaxation was observed. Figure C3.5.5 shows the possible modes of relaxation for B-emitting XeF and some experimentally detennined time constants. Although a diatomic in an atomic lattice seems to be a simple system, these vibronic relaxation experiments are rather complicated to interiDret, because of multiple electronic states which are involved due to energy transfer between B and C sites. 

Figure C3.5.5. Vibronic relaxation time constants for B- and C-state emitting sites of XeF in solid Ar for different vibrational quantum numbers v, from [25]. Vibronic energy relaxation is complicated by electronic crossings caused by energy transfer between sites.

In photoluminescence one measures physical and chemical properties of materials by using photons to induce excited electronic states in the material system and analyzing the optical emission as these states relax. Typically, light is directed onto the sample for excitation, and the emitted luminescence is collected by a lens and passed through an optical spectrometer onto a photodetector. The spectral distribution and time dependence of the emission are related to electronic transition probabilities within the sample, and can be used to provide qualitative and, sometimes, quantitative information about chemical composition, structure (bonding, disorder, interfaces, quantum wells), impurities, kinetic processes, and energy transfer. 

Reactive trajectories, 43-44,45, 88,90-92,215 downhill trajectories, 90,91 velocity of, 90 Relaxation processes, 122 Relaxation times, 122 Reorganization energy, 92,227 Resonance integral, 10 Resonance structures, 58,143 for amide hydrolysis, 174,175 covalent bonding arrangement for, 84 for Cys-His proton transfer in papain, 141 for general acid catalysis, 160,161 for phosphodiester hydrolysis, 191-195,... 

The process of spin-lattice relaxation involves the transfer of magnetization between the magnetic nuclei (spins) and their environment (the lattice). The rate at which this transfer of energy occurs is the spin-lattice relaxation-rate (/ , in s ). The inverse of this quantity is the spin-lattice relaxation-time (Ti, in s), which is the experimentally determinable parameter. In principle, this energy interchange can be mediated by several different mechanisms, including dipole-dipole interactions, chemical-shift anisotropy, and spin-rotation interactions. For protons, as will be seen later, the dominant relaxation-mechanism for energy transfer is usually the intramolecular dipole-dipole interaction. 

Anti-Stokes picosecond TR spectra were also obtained with pump-probe time delays over the 0 to 10 ps range and selected spectra are shown in Figure 3.33. The anti-Stokes Raman spectrum at Ops indicates that hot, unrelaxed, species are produced. The approximately 1521 cm ethylenic stretch Raman band vibrational frequency also suggests that most of the Ops anti-Stokes TR spectrum is mostly due to the J intermediate. The 1521 cm Raman band s intensity and its bandwidth decrease with a decay time of about 2.5 ps, and this can be attributed the vibrational cooling and conformational relaxation of the chromophore as the J intermediate relaxes to produce the K intermediate.This very fast relaxation of the initially hot J intermediate is believed to be due to strong coupling between the chromophore the protein bath that can enable better energy transfer compared to typical solute-solvent interactions. ... 

Fig. 9. Incidence energy dependence of the vibrational state population distribution resulting when NO(u = 12) is scattered from LiF(OOl) at a surface temperature of (a) 480 K, and (b) 290 K. Relaxation of large amplitude vibrational motion to phonons is weak compared to what is possible on metals. Increased relaxation at the lowest incidence energies and surface temperatures are indicators of a trapping/desorption mechanism for vibrational energy transfer. Angular and rotational population distributions support this conclusion. Estimations of the residence times suggest that coupling to phonons is significant when residence times are only as long as ps. (See Ref. 58.)...

The saturation behavior of a spectrum - the variation of integrated intensity with microwave power - is related to the spin-lattice relaxation time, a measure of the rate of energy transfer between the electron spin and its surroundings. Saturation often depends on the same structural and dynamic properties as line widths. 

If the conditions for Forster transfer are not applicable, then the theory must be extended. There is recently experimental evidence that coherent energy transfer participates in photosynthesis [74, 75], In this case, the participating molecules are very close together. The excited state of the donor does not completely relax to the Boltzmann distribution before the energy can be shared with the acceptor, and the transfer can no longer be described by a Forster mechanism. We will not discuss this case. There has been active discussion of coherent transfer and very strong interactions in the literature for a longer time [69], and references can be found in some more recent papers [70-72, 76, 77],... 

The events taking place in the RCs within the timescale of ps and sub-ps ranges usually involve vibrational relaxation, internal conversion, and photo-induced electron and energy transfers. It is important to note that in order to observe such ultrafast processes, ultrashort pulse laser spectroscopic techniques are often employed. In such cases, from the uncertainty principle AEAt Ti/2, one can see that a number of states can be coherently (or simultaneously) excited. In this case, the observed time-resolved spectra contain the information of the dynamics of both populations and coherences (or phases) of the system. Due to the dynamical contribution of coherences, the quantum beat is often observed in the fs time-resolved experiments. 

---