Enantiodifferentiation

D. Haring, T. Konig, B. Withopf, M. Herderich and P. Schi eier, Enantiodifferentiation of a-ketols in sherry by one- and two-dimensional HRGC tecliniques , J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 20 351-354 (1997). 

The fourth factor becomes an issue when anti betaine formation is reversible or partially reversible. This can occur with more hindered or more stable ylides. In these cases the enantiodifferentiating step becomes either the bond rotation or the ring-closure step (Scheme 1.12), and as a result the observed enantioselectivities are generally lower (Entry 5, Table 1.5 the electron-deficient aromatic ylide gives lower enantioselectivity). However the use of protic solvents (Entry 6, Table 1.5) or lithium salts has been shown to reduce reversibility in betaine formation and can result in increased enantioselectivities in these cases [13]. Although protic solvents give low yields and so are not practically useful, lithium salts do not suffer this drawback. [18]... 

As the formation of betaines from amide-stabilized ylides is known to be reversible (in contrast with aryl- or semistabilized ylides, which can exhibit irreversible anti betaine formation see Section 1.2.1.3), the enantiodifferentiating step cannot be the C-C bond-forming step. B3LYP calculations of the individual steps along the reaction pathway have shown that in this instance ring-closure has the highest barrier and is most likely to be the enantiodifferentiating step of the reaction (Scheme 1.16) [25]. 

Enantioselective electron transfer reactions are not possible in principle because the electron cannot possess chirality. Whenever the choice of enantiodifferentiation becomes apparent, it will occur in chemical steps subsequent (or prior) to electron transfer. Thus, enantioselectivities require a chiral environment in the reaction layer of electrochemical intermediates although asymmetric induction was report-... 

An overall efficiency of TRISPHAT 8 and BINPHAT 15 anions as NMR chiral shift agents for chiral cations has been demonstrated over the last few years. Additions of ammonium salts of the A or A enantiomers of 8 and 15 to solutions of racemic or enantioenriched chiral cationic substrates have generally led to efficient NMR enantiodifferentiations [112-121]. Well-separated signals are usually observed on the spectra of the diastereomeric salts generated in situ. 

Recently, Lacour, Sauvage and coworkers were able to show that the association of chiral [CuL2] complexes (L=2-R-phen,6-R-bpy and2-iminopyridine) with TRISPHAT 8 leads to an NMR enantiodifferentiation, which allows the determination of the kinetics of racemization of the complexes (bpy=2,2 -bipyri-dine phen=l,10-phenanthroline) [119]. This type of application has recently been reported in conjunction with chiral sandwich-shaped trinuclear silver(l) complexes [122]. Several reports, independent from Lacour s group,have confirmed the efficiency of these chiral shift agents [123-127]. Finally, TRISPHAT can be used to determine the enantiomeric purity of (r] -arene)chromium complexes. These results broaden the field of application of 8 to chiral neutral, and not just cationic, species [114,128,129]. 

The reduction of the catalyst precursor with sodium formate resulted in a lower Pd dispersion than the catalyst prepared by hydrogen reduction, the particle size is much larger in the former catalyst. The mesoporous carbon supported Pd catalysts are near to those of Pd on titania with respect to their enantiodifferentiating ability. Besides the metal dispersion, the availability of the Pd surface in the pores for the large modifier molecules seems to be the determining factor of the enantioselectivity. 

There are two views on the origin of enantiodifferentiation (ED) using Pt-cinchona catalyst system. In the classical approach it has been proposed that the ED takes place on the metal crystallite of sufficient size required for the adsorption of the chiral modifier, the reactant and hydrogen [8], Contrary to that the shielding effect model suggest the formation of substrate-modifier complex in the liquid phase and its hydrogenation over Pt sites [9],... 

Two model structures ((59) and (60)) for the enantiodifferentiating step in the [2 + 2] and [2 + 3] pathways have been given by the Sharpless and Corey groups, respectively (Figure 8). Both models can explain the stereochemistry observed in asymmetric dihydroxylation. 

Figure 8 Sharpless and Corey models for the enantiodifferentiating step in dihydroxylation.

The application of a chiral auxiliary or catalyst, in either stoichiometric or catalytic fashion, has been a common practice in asymmetric synthesis, and most of such auxiliaries are available in homochiral form. Some processes of enantiodifferentiation arise from diastereomeric interactions in racemic mixtures and thus cause enhanced enantioselectivity in the reaction. In other words, there can be a nonlinear relationship between the optical purity of the chiral auxiliary and the enantiomeric excess of the product. One may expect that a chiral ligand, not necessarily in enantiomerically pure form, can lead to high levels of asymmetric induction via enantiodiscrimination. In such cases, a nonlinear relationship (NLE) between the ee of the product and the ee of the chiral ligand may be observed. 

Metal oxides were also chirally modified and few of them showed a significant or at least useful e.s. Thus, while Al203/alkaloid [80] showed no enantiodifferentiation, Zn, Cu, and Cd tartrate salts were quite selective for a carbene addition (45% e.e.) [81] and for the nucleophilic ring opening of epoxides (up to 85% e.e.) [82], Recently, it was claimed that /(-zeolite, partially enriched in the chiral polymorph A, catalyzed the ring opening of an epoxide with low but significant e.s. (5% e.e.) [83], All these catalysts are notyet practically important but rather demonstrate that amorphous metal oxides can be modified successfully. 

The differences between the A(AG) values of diastereomeric complexes (AA(AG) = A(AG) — A(AG) in Table 9) demonstrate that the kinetic method can be used to enantiodifferentiate chiral ions and molecules in the gas phase. 

Using this procedure, D- and L-a-amino acids have been enantiodifferentiated in the gas phase. ESI of hydroalcoholic solutions of the amino acid and CUCI2 into the source of an ion trap mass spectrometer reveals the presence of singly charged, covalently bound dimeric and trimeric ions. Table 10 reports the CID results of the diastereomeric complexes [A/ -Cu -(ref)2-H] and [As-Cu (ref)2-H]. ... 

There are several methods to enantiodifferentiate chiral ammonium ions by FAB-MS. One is the so-called enantiomer-labeled (EL) guest method. The method is based on the preparation of a mixture containing the enantiopure host (denoted as U) and the racemate of the guest. One of the guest enantiomers is isotopically labeled (e.g., [M5]+) and the other is not (e.g., [M ] ). Consequently, the signals for the two diastereomeric host-guest pairs (i.e., [U M/j] and [U-Ms] of equations (21) and (22)) appear at different miz ratios. 

In an attempt to rationalize the factors that control selectivity in the Rh- and Ir-catalyzed hydroboration reactions, Fernandez and Bo [35] carried out experimental and theoretical studies on the H—B addition of catecholborane to vinylarenes with [M(C0D)(R-QUINAP)]BF4, (QUINAP = l-(2-diphenylphosphino-l-naphthyl) isoquinoHne). A considerable difference was found in the stability of the isomers when the substrate was coordinated to the iridium(I) or rhodium(I) complexes. In particular, the difference between pro-R B1 and pro-S B2 isomers was not so great when the metal center was iridium and not rhodium (Figure 7.1), which explains the low ee-values observed experimentally when asymmetric iridium-catalyzed hydroboration was performed. Structurally, the energy analysis of the n2 and Tti interactions [36] seems to be responsible for the extra stabilization of the B2 isomer in the iridium intermediates (Figure 7.1). The coordination and insertion of alkenes, then, could be considered key steps in the enantiodifferentiation pathway. 

There has been considerable interest in various photocycloaddition reactions over the last years which not only broadened the number of useful photochemical applications but also revealed further mechanistic insight into these reactions [76,77]. Among these reactions, reports focusing on either the [2 -h 2] or the [4 -I- 2] cycloaddition, are numerous. Also the efforts toward the enantiodifferentiating photosensitization in photocyclization reactions have to be mentioned [78],... 

A kinetic resolntion by enantiodifferentiating deprotonation of atropoisomeric 1-naphthalenecarboxamides rac-436 by means of i-BuLi/(—)-sparteine (11) was reported by Thaynmanavan, Beak and Cnrran (equation 117). Compound (5 )-437 racemizes essentially completely during 8 d at room temperature. The stereoselectivity is achieved in the deprotonation step, as was demonstrated by control experiments. 

I. Enantiodifferentiating Reactions (Enantiotopos-, F.nantioface-, Enantiomer-Differentiating Reactions)... 

The proposed mechanism of the enantiodifferentiation involves chelation of the ester carbonyl oxygen to the enolate as illustrated with A and B66. Transition state B is believed to be destabilized relative to A due to a steric interaction between the a-methyl group and the cyclopentadienyl ligand. The presence of hexamethylphosphoramide reduced the diastereomer-ic ratio to 86 14, supporting the intermediacy of chelated species. 

The push toward enaotiomerically-pure carbocyclic intermediates has led to the development of new methods for the enantiodifferentiation of inexpensive prochiral cyclic starting materials. For instance, Robert H. Morris of the University of Toronto recently reported (Organic Lett. 2005, 7, 1757) that a family of enantiomerically-pure Ru complexes originally developed for asymmetric transfer hydrogenation also mediate the enantioselective addition of malonatc to cyclohexenone. 

Acid-catalyzed photohydration of styrenes19 and additions to cyclohexenes20 leading exclusively to the Markovnikov products are also possible. Sensitized photoaddition, in contrast, results in products from anti-Markovnikov addition. The process is a photoinduced electron transfer21 taking place usually in polar solvents.22,23 Enantiodifferentiating addition in nonpolar solvents has been reported.24 The addition of MeOH could be carried out in a stereoselective manner to achieve solvent-dependent product distribution 25... 

---