Elements modern concepts

Lavoisier summarized his ideas developed over the previous twenty years in his seminal 1789 book Traite Elementaire de Chimie (Elements of Chemistry). This work presented his findings on gases and the role of heat in chemical reactions. He explained his oxygen theory and how this theory was superior to phlogiston theory. Lavoisier established the concept of a chemical element as a substance that could not be broken down by chemical means or made from other chemicals. Lavoisier also presented a table of thirty-three elements. The thirty-three elements mistakenly included light and caloric (heat). Lavoisier put forth the modern concept of a chemical reaction, the importance of quantitative measurement, and the principle of conservation of mass. The final part of Lavoisier s book presented chemical methods, a sort of cookbook for performing experiments. 

Akasa, or ether, is assumed not to consist of atoms, but is infinite in extent, continuous and eternal. It cannot be apprehended by the senses, but is the carrier of sound. It is also described by certain authorities as all-pervasive, occupying the same space that is occupied by the various forms of matter, and therefore devoid of the property of impenetrability, characterizing the atoms of other elements. In this respect, it resembles the modern concept of the ether which conveys light. Deussen quotes from the Upanisliad a passage which conveys an idea of akasa as the primal element from which the others were evolved. 

The atom of Democritus presents in its relation to the four elements, a certain analogy to the modern concept of... 

It appears from the above that attempts to consider the nature of M—X bonds (M = Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) in analogy to C—X bonds on the basis of simple electronegativity usually fail. A deeper understanding of the observed trends is possible only on the basis of modern concepts on the electronic structure of compounds of the silicon subgroup elements. 

The first indication of the modern concept of an element is to be found as early as Boyle (1627-1691), who was, however, far in advance of his time. Lavoisier (1743-1794) gives the purely empirical definition of an element, still valid in chemistry, as a substance which cannot be divided by any means or by any conversion. We must make an exception at present only for nuclear processes in which, both in natural radioactivity and in artificial processes brought about by neutrons, protons, etc., transmutation of the elements can take place. 

Aristotle s elements refer to states, rather than to kinds of matter. The Aristotelian concept of elements was thus very remote from the.modern concept, and the two seem to have in common only a striving to find simplicity in nature. The modern concept of elements as simple forms of matter was first introduced by the English scientist Robert Boyle (1627-1691), in his book The Skeptical Chymist, published in 1662. The first successful application of Boyle s concept was made by the French chemist Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794), who gave an essentially correct table of thirty-three elements (including, however, heat and light ) in his book Truite hlementaire de Chimie in 1789. 

Structural formulas serve a key role as devices to facilitate communication of chemical information, but it is important to recognize at the outset that the relationship of a structural formula to molecular structure is a symbolic one. The current system of structural formulas arose largely as a result of chemistry done in the last half of the nineteenth century. Elemental analyses, interrelation of various compounds, and systematic investigation of the reactivity of various functional groups permitted organic chemists to deduce correctly much information about molecular structure. For many molecules, it became possible to draw conclusions as to which atoms were directly connected. Lines drawn between atoms were used to represent direct connections or bonds. These structural deductions predated modern concepts of atomic and molecular structure and of the nature of the forces that bind atoms. With the advent of quantum mechanics and new experimental techniques for accurate determination of such basic structural parameters as bond lengths and bond... 

In the very words selected to denote the subject that I have the honour of bringing before you, I have raised a question which may be regarded as heretical. At the time when our modern conception of chemistry first dawned upon the scientific mind, the average chemist as a matter of course accepted the elements as ultimate facts. 

Chapters 8 and 9 are dedicated to the context and historical background of the Tableau. Chapter 8 explores the fields of chemical theory and practice in which the chemistry of pure chemical substances originated in the early modern period. We will particularly study operations with such substances in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century metallurgy and pharmaceutical salt production, as well as the interpretations of these operations by the historical actors, in which elements of the modern concept of chemical compound gradually developed. Around 1700, the bulk of these as yet independent and little-connected chemical operations using pure substances was integrated into a consistent system on the basis of the concept of replacement reaction. This integration, which established the chemistry of pure chemical substances as a special domain of chemical theory and practice, is affirmed by the affinity tables of... 

Boyle then went on to advance for the first time what is essentially the modern conception of an element, which he visualised as a substance which cannot be split up into simpler ones. I now mean by Elements/ he wrote, as those Chymists that speak plainest do by their Principles, certain Primitive and simple, or perfectly unminglcd bodies which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, arc the Ingredients of which all those call d perfectly mixt Bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved. It was more than a hundred years later that Lavoisier devised experimental means of recognising elements. 

Theoretical values (in eV), derived from the density functional formalism, for elements Z = 1 through 86 [11] may be mentioned as an example of work done within the modern concepts. 

The Elements Symbols for the Elements Dalton s Atomic Theory Formulas of Compounds The Structure of the Atom Introduction to the Modern Concept of Atomic Structure Isotopes... 

The concept that all substances are composed of elements and atoms goes back at least 2000 years. Originally, only four elements were recognized air, earth, fire, and water. Each substance was thought to consist of very small particles, called atoms, that could not be subdivided any further. This early mental concept of the nature of matter was extremely prescient, considering there were no experimental results to indicate that matter should be so and none to verify that it was so. Modern atomic theory is much more rigorously based, and we even have the ability to see atoms with special tunneling microscopes. All of chemistry is based on how atoms react with each other. 

But as argued in a recent book, once one accepts that the more correct ordering principle for the elements is atomic number the concept of triads makes a significant return, at least in about half of all conceivable triads in the modern table (6). Using the atomic numbers of chlorine, bromine, and iodine for example the middle element is not just the approximate mean of the atomic numbers of the flanking elements but the exact mean. 

---